Particle number fluctuations in a cloven trapped Bose gas at finite temperature

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Sinatra, A ^a   Castin, Y ^a   Li, Yun ^b  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^b EAST CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS; ATOM NUMBERS; BOSE GAS; CLASSICAL FIELDS; CRITICAL TEMPERATURES; FINITE TEMPERATURES; HIGH TEMPERATURE; INTERFERENCE EFFECTS; LARGE SYSTEM SIZE; NONINTERACTING ATOMS; PARTICLE NUMBERS; THOMAS-FERMI; THREE DIMENSIONS;

BOSONS;

TEMPERATURE;

EID: 77953210983     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.053623     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. M. Budde and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.053618 70, 053618 (2004). (Pubitemid 40073003)
2. Y. Castin, J. Phys. IV France JPICEI 1155-4339 10.1051/jp4:2004116004 116, 89 (2004).
3. Y. Castin, in Lecture Notes of the 2006 Varenna Enrico Fermi School on Fermi Gases, edited by, M. Inguscio,,, W. Ketterle,, and, C. Salomon, (SIF, Rome, 2007).
4. G. E. Astrakharchik, R. Combescot, and L. P. Pitaevskii, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.063616 76, 063616 (2007). (Pubitemid 350281240)
5. R. Brustein and A. Yarom, J. Stat. Mech. 1742-5468 10.1088/1742-5468/ 2008/07/P07025 (2008) P07025.
6. L. S. Levitov, H.-W. Lee, and G. B. Lesovik, J. Math. Phys. JMAPAQ 0022-2488 10.1063/1.531672 37, 4845 (1996).
7. J. Esteve, J.-B. Trebbia, T. Schumm, A. Aspect, C. I. Westbrook, and I. Bouchoule, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.130403 96, 130403 (2006).
8. Presentation of J. Reichel at the BEC 2009 conference, San Feliu de Guixols, Spain;
9. K. Maussang, e-print arXiv: 1005.1922.
10. Y. Castin, in Lecture Notes of Les Houches Summer School, edited by, R. Kaiser,,, C. Westbrook,, and, F. David, (EDP Sciences and Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001), p. 1-136.
11. L. Landau and E. Lifchitz, in Physique Théorique, Tome V: Physique Statistique, 4th ed. (Mir, Moscow, 1994), pp. 103-104.
12. ′). Using polar coordinates we obtain I = 1 2 √ α β arctan β - α 2 √ α β. For β > α this is also I = 1 √ α β [π 4 - 1 2 arctan 2 √ α β β - α] = 1 √ α β [π 4 - arctan √ α β].
13. /2 (1 - l η x 2)] Π α (1 + l η α 2). This result is qualitatively incorrect: It depends on ω y and ω z, whereas the exact expression (13) does not. It is quantitatively incorrect even in the isotropic case, where c LDA ~ (1 / 2) / η x for η x → 0, to be compared to (21).
14. S. Grossmann and M. Holthaus, Z. Naturforsch. A 50, 921 (1995);
15. S. Grossmann and M. Holthaus, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/0375-9601(95)00766-V 208, 188 (1995).
16. /2 ζ (- 1 / 2) / π.
17. )-rr), but this does not affect the result due to symmetry reasons.
18. Yu. Kagan, B. V. Svistunov, and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Sov. Phys. JETP 75, 387 (1992);
19. Yu. Kagan and B. V. Svistunov, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3331 79, 3331 (1997).
20. K. Damle, S. N. Majumdar, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.5037 54, 5037 (1996).
21. K. Góral, M. Gajda, and K. Rzazewski, Opt. Express OPEXFF 1094-4087 10.1364/OE.8.000092 8, 92 (2001);
22. D. Kadio, M. Gajda, and K. Rzazewski, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.013607 72, 013607 (2005). (Pubitemid 41492539)
23. M. J. Davis, S. A. Morgan, and K. Burnett, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.160402 87, 160402 (2001).
24. M. Fattori, C. D'Errico, G. Roati, M. Zaccanti, M. Jona-Lasinio, M. Modugno, M. Inguscio, and G. Modugno, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.080405 100, 080405 (2008). (Pubitemid 351419059)
25. E. Mandonnet, Ph.D. thesis, University Paris 6 (2000); [http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00011872/fr/].
26. Y. Castin and R. Dum, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.57. 3008 57, 3008 (1998).
27. The accuracy of the Bogoliubov approximation to calculate the pair distribution function was checked by exact quantum Monte Carlo calculations for a trapped gas [24].
28. M. Holzmann and Y. Castin, Eur. Phys. J. D EPJDF6 1434-6060 10.1007/s100530050586 7, 425 (1999).
29. A. Sinatra, C. Lobo, and Y. Castin, J. Phys. B JPAPEH 0953-4075 10.1088/0953-4075/35/17/301 35, 3599 (2002).
30. P. Villain, M. Lewenstein, R. Dum, Y. Castin, L. You, A. Imamoglu, and T. A. B. Kennedy, J. Mod. Opt. JMOPEW 0950-0340 10.1080/095003497152807 44, 1775 (1997).
31. *= v j, we obtain δ ρ j = ψ 0 (u j + v j) and δ S / = (u j - v j) / (2 i ψ 0). For real mode functions the normalization condition u j 2 - v j 2 = 1 together with Euler's equation - i ε j δ S j / = - g δ ρ j gives the normalization condition 2 g ε j U (r) < μ d 3 r δ ρ j 2 = 1. Let us consider for simplicity the isotropic case (see, e.g., [S. Sinha and Y. Castin, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87. 190402 87, 190402 (2001)] for the general anisotropic case). In the hydrodynamic approximation, δ ρ is a product of a polynomial P (r / R), where R is the Thomas-Fermi radius, a spherical harmonic and a normalization factor N j. The coefficients of the polynomial are numbers that were calculated in
32. [S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77. 2360 77, 2360 (1996)]. We then find that N j 2 scales as ε j / (gR 3) so that the matrix element squared | s (x) (| u j + | v j ) | 2 scales as ε j / μ. On the other hand, nj k B T / ε j for the low-frequency modes. We then find the scaling c class k B T / μ.
33. -1η=j(1/ εj)[(|vj|uj)(\uj|,vj|)+(|uj*|vj*)(vj*|,j*|)] with η=(100-1), see, e.g., Ref. [22].