Evaluation of forward collision warning system visual alert candidates and SAE J2400

SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 750-764

  Perez, Miguel A ^a   Kiefer, Raymond J ^b   Haskins, Alice ^a   Hankey, Jonathan M ^a  

^a VIRGINIA TECH TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A-CENTER; CENTERLINES; CHANGE DETECTION; FORWARD COLLISION WARNING SYSTEM; FORWARD COLLISION WARNINGS; HEAD UP DISPLAYS; MULTI-MODALITY; ON-ROAD STUDIES; REAR-END CRASHES; SCENE CHANGE; TIME SAVINGS; TIME-COURSE ANALYSIS; UNDERLYING MECHANISM;

ALARM SYSTEMS; INSTRUMENT PANELS; INSTRUMENTS; ROADS AND STREETS;

EYE MOVEMENTS;

EID: 77953198997     PISSN: 19463995     EISSN: 19464002     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4271/2009-01-0547     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Automotive Collision Avoidance System Field Operational Test Final Program Report. (2005). DOT HS 809 886. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration. Washington, DC.
2. Ball, K. K., & Owsley, C. (1992). The useful field of view test: a new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 63, 71-79.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002). 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: Methods and Development. Vital and Health Statistics, 11(246).
4. Fitch, G. M., Kiefer, R. J., Hankey, J. M., & Kleiner, B. M. (2007). Toward developing an approach for alerting drivers to the direction of a crash threat. Human Factors, 49(4), 710-720.
5. Grant, B. S., Kiefer, R. J., & Wierwille, W. W. (1995). Drivers' detection and identification of head-up versus head-down telltale warnings in automobiles Paper presented at the Designing for the Global Village. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting.
6. Gros, B. L., Greenhouse, D. S., & Cohn, T. E. (2005). Visual warning signals optimized for human perception: What the eye sees fastest Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2(1), 45-52.
7. Kiefer, R. J. (1996). A review of driver performance with head-up displays. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Third Annual World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Orlando, FL.
8. Kiefer, R. J., Cassar, M. T., Flannagan, C. A., & Jerome, C. J. (2005). Forward collision warning requirements project final report - Task 2 and 3a: Surprise braking trials, time-to-collision judgments, and "first look" maneuvers under realistic rear-end crash scenarios (Report No. DOT HS 809 902). Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
9. Kiefer, R. J., LeBlanc, D., Palmer, M., Salinger, J., Deering, R., & Shulman, M. (1999). Development and validation of functional definitions and evaluation procedures for collision warning/avoidance systems (Report No. DOT HS 808 964). Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
10. Kroemer, K. (1989). Engineering anthropometry. Ergonomics, 32(7), 767-784.
11. Lind, H. (2007). An efficient visual forward collision warning display for vehicles (SAE Technical Paper No. 2007-01-1105). Detroit, MI: Society of Automotive Engineers.
12. Rognin, L., Alidra, S., Val, C., Lescaut, A., & Chalandon, X. (2007). Driver strategies when interacting with information and entertainment Systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles.
13. Society of Automotive Engineers. (2003). Human Factors in Forward Collision Warning Systems: Operating characteristics and user interface requirements (Surface Vehicle Information Report No. J2400). Detroit, MI: Society of Automotive Engineers.