Some prosodic characteristics of repeated talk following conversation repair requests by adults with hearing impairment

Seminars in Hearing

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 127-139

  Lind, Christopher ^a   Campbell, Keira ^a   Davey, Abby ^a   Rodgers, Lisa ^a   Seipolt, Courtney ^a   Akins, Christy ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Conversation repair; Hearing impairment; Prosody; Repetition; Suprasegmental

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CONVERSATION; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LOUDNESS; MALE; PITCH; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

EID: 77953195411     PISSN: 07340451     EISSN: 10988955     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1252102     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Linell P. Toubles with mutualities: towards a dialogical theory of misunderstanding and miscommunication In: Markova I, Graumann C, Foppa K Mutualities in Dialogue. Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press 1995 176-213
2. Noble W. What is a psychosocial approach to hearing loss? Scand Audiol 1996 25 (Suppl 43) 6-11
3. Erber N P. Hearing Vision Communication and Older People. Melbourne, Australia Clavis 2002
4. Tye-Murray N. Foundations of Aural Rehabilitation; Children, Adults, and Their Family Members. 3rd ed. Clifton Park, NY Delmar Cengage Learning 2009
5. Helfer K S. Auditory and auditory-visual recognition of clear and conversational speech by older adults. J Am Acad Audiol 1998 9 234-242
6. Schum D J. Intelligibility of clear and conversational speech of young and elderly talkers. J Am Acad Audiol 1996 7 212-218
7. Picheny M A., Durlach N I., Braida L D. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. J Speech Hear Res 1985 28 96-103
8. Picheny M A., Durlach N I., Braida L D. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. J Speech Hear Res 1986 29 434-446
9. Picheny M A., Durlach N I., Braida L D. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing III: an attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate to differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech. J Speech Hear Res 1989 32 600-603
10. Uchanski R M., Choi S S., Braida L D., Reed C M., Durlach N I. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: further studies of the role of speaking rate. J Speech Hear Res 1996 39 494-509
11. Lind C, Hickson L, Erber N P. Conversation repair and adult cochlear implantation: a qualitative case study. Cochl Impl Int 2006 7 33-48
12. Curl T S. Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: The phonetic differentiation of "repetitions" Disc Proc 2005 39 (1) 1-43
13. Tye-Murray N, Witt S. Conversational moves and conversational styles of adults cochlear-implant users. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 1996 29 11-25
14. Lind C. Conversation repair and adult acquired hearing impairment. Ph.D. thesis. Brisbane, Australia Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Queensland 2006
15. Lind C. Conversation repair strategies in audiologic rehabilitation In: Montano J, Spitzer J Adult Audiologic Rehabilitation. San Diego, CA Plural 2009
16. Berger C R., DiBattista P. Communication failure and plan adaptation: if at first you don't success, say it louder and slower. Commun Monogr 1993 60 220-238
17. Kochanski G, Grabe J, Coleman J, Rosner B. Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little. J Acoust Soc Am 2005 118 1038-1054
18. Watson P J., Hughes D. The relationship of vocal loudness manipulation to prosodic F0 and durational variables in healthy adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006 49 636-644
19. Gramming P, Sundberg J, Ternstrom S, Leanderson R. Relationship between changes in voice pitch and loudness. J Voice 1988 2 118-126
20. Atkinson JM, Heritage J Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press 1984
21. Adobe Systems. Adobe Audition [computer program]. Version 1.5. Mexico, CA Adobe Systems 2004
22. PRAAT. Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 5.1.052009
23. Ford C, Thompson S. Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational and pragmatic resources for the management of turns In: Ochs E, Schegloff EA, Thompson S Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press 1996 134-184
24. Schegloff E A., Jefferson G, Sacks H. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair for conversation. Language 1977 53 361-382
25. Clark H H., Schaefer E F. Collaborating on contributions to conversation. Lang Cogn Process 1987 2 19-41