The social influence model of technology adoption

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 149-153

  Vannoy, Sandra A ^a   Palvia, Prashant ^b  

^a APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS INTERACTIONS; BUSINESS PRACTICES; CDS; COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY; COMPLEX MODEL; CROSS-DISCIPLINARY; EASE OF USE; END USERS; ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY; ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS; FILE EXCHANGE; FILE FORMATS; FILE SHARING; FORRESTER RESEARCH; FUNDAMENTAL CHANGES; GROUP INTERACTION; GROUP MEMBERS; GROUP MEMBERSHIPS; HIGH QUALITY; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; INDIVIDUAL TECHNOLOGY; INSTANT MESSAGING; INTRA-GROUP; IT ADOPTION; LITTLE RESEARCH; LOW QUALITIES; MAINSTREAM MEDIA; MUSIC DOWNLOADS; MUSIC SHARING; P2P FILE SHARING; P2P NETWORK; PEER TO PEER; POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS; REMOTE FILE ACCESS; SMS TEXT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL COMPUTING; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; SOCIAL INFLUENCE MODEL; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES; SOCIAL STRUCTURE; SOCIETAL CHANGES; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; TEXT MESSAGING; USER-DEFINED LANGUAGE; WEB-BASED FORUMS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMMUNICATION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTERNET; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; MAGNETIC TAPE; MESSAGE PASSING; PEER TO PEER NETWORKS; SALES; SOCIAL ASPECTS; TECHNOLOGY; WEB BROWSERS; WEBSITES;

INNOVATION;

EID: 77953192501     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1743546.1743585     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Agre, P. P2P and the promise of Internet equality. Comm. ACM 46, 2 (Feb. 2003), 39-42.
2. Axelrod, R. On Six Advances in Cooperation Theory The Evolution of Cooperation. School of Public Policy University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI, Jan. 2000.
3. Baron, S., Patterson, A. and Harris, K. Beyond technology acceptance: Understanding consumer practice. International Journal of Service Industry Management 17, 2 (2006), 111-135.
4. Chapin, F. S. Social theory and social action. American Sociological Review 1, 1 (1936), 1-11.
5. Davis, F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3 (1989), 319-340.
6. Dholakia, U., Bagozzi, R. and Pearo, L. A social infuence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing 21, 3 (2004), 241-263.
7. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA: 1975.
8. Horowitz, I. L. Consensus, confict and cooperation: A sociological inventory. Social Forces 41, 2, (1962), 177-188.
9. Parameswaran, M. and Whinston, A. Research issues in social computing, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8, 6 (2007), 336-350.
10. Schepers, J. and Wetzels, M. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management 44, (2006), 90-103.
11. Wilska, T. Mobile phone use as part of young people's consumption styles. Journal of Consumer Policy 26, (2003), 441-463
12. Zambrano, E. Authority, social theories International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Department of Finance and Business Economics Mendoza College of Business University of Notre Dame South Bend, IN, 2000.