Research bias: A review for medical students

Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 2320-2324

  Krishna, R ^a   Maithreyi, R ^a   Surapaneni, K M ^a  

^a SAVEETHA MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SAMPLING; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; VALIDITY;

EID: 77953180429     PISSN: None     EISSN: 0973709X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Gregory T. Sica. Bias in Research Studies. Radiology. 2006; 238 (3): 780-89.
2. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Radiology 2003; 226: 24-28.
3. Hartman JM, Forsen JW, Wallace MS, Neely JG. Tutorials in clinical research: Part IV: Recognizing and controlling bias. Laryngoscope. 2002; 112: 23-31.
4. Beam CA. Fundamental of clinical research for radiologists: statistically engineering the study for success. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179: 47-52.
5. Kazerooni EA. Fundamentals of clinical research for radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 993-99.
6. Blackmore CC. The challenge of clinical radiology research. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 327-31.
7. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999; 282: 1061-66.
8. Blackmore CC, Black WC, Jarvik JG, Langlotz CP. A critical synopsis of the diagnostic and screening radiology outcomes literature. Acad Radiol. 1999; 6(suppl 1): S8-S18.