Influence of soil fumigation by methyl bromide and methyl iodide on rhizosphere and phyllosphere microbial community structure

Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part B Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 427-436

  Ibekwe, A M ^a   Papiernik, S K ^b   Yang, C H ^c  

^a U S SALINITY LABORATORY   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis; Methyl bromide methyl iodide; Microbial communities; Rhizosphere, phyllosphere

Indexed keywords

DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; METHYL BROMIDE; METHYL IODIDE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; PHYLLOSPHERES;

BACTERIOLOGY; BROMINE COMPOUNDS; CLONING; DENATURATION; ELECTROPHORESIS; FUMIGATION; GELS; PESTICIDES; RNA;

SOILS;

BACTERIAL DNA; BROMINATED HYDROCARBON; IODINATED HYDROCARBON; METHYL BROMIDE; METHYL IODIDE; RNA 16S;

BACTERIUM; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; DICOTYLEDON; ELECTROKINESIS; FUMIGATION; GROWING SEASON; GROWTH RATE; METHYL BROMIDE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PHYLLOSPHERE; RHIZOSPHERE; RNA;

ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FUMIGATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LETTUCE; LIVERWORT; MICROBIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RHIZOBIUM; RHIZOSPHERE; SEASON; SOIL POLLUTANT; TIME;

DNA, BACTERIAL; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FUMIGATION; HEPATOPHYTA; HYDROCARBONS, BROMINATED; HYDROCARBONS, IODINATED; LETTUCE; PLANT LEAVES; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RHIZOBIUM; RHIZOSPHERE; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SEASONS; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; SOIL POLLUTANTS; TIME FACTORS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BRADYRHIZOBIUM JAPONICUM; BRADYRHIZOBIUM JAPONICUM USDA 110; LACTUCA; LACTUCA SATIVA; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PHOTORHABDUS LUMINESCENS; PROTEOBACTERIA; PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE; PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE PV. TOMATO;

EID: 77953170570     PISSN: 03601234     EISSN: 15324109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03601231003800131     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Noling, J. W.; Becker, J. O. The challenge of research and extension to define and implement alternatives to methyl bromide. J Nematol. 1994,26,573-586.
2. Anderson, S. O.; Lee-Bapty, S. Methyl bromide interim technology and economic assessment (Montreal Protocol Assessment Supplement). United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): Nairobi,Kenya, 1992.
3. Ferguson, W.; Padula, A. Economic effects of banning methyl bromide for soil fumigation, USDA Economic Research Service, Agriculture Economic Report 677; USDA: Beltsville, MD, 1994.
4. Yates, S. R.; Gan, J.; Papiernik, S. K. Environmental fate of methyl bromide as a soil fumigant. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2003, 177,45-122.
5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Protection of stratospheric ozone: Incorporation of Clean Air Act Amendments for reductions in Class I, Group VI controlled substances. Fed. Regist. 2000,65,70795-70804.
6. Ohr, H. D.; Sims, J. J.; Grech, N. M.; Becker, J. O.; McGiffen, M.E. Methyl iodide, an ozone-safe alternative to methyl bromides as a soil fumigant. Plant Dis. 1996, 80, 731-735.
7. Price, N. R. The mode of action of fumigants. J. Stored Prod. Res. 1985,21,157-164.
8. Gan, J.; Yates, S. R.; Anderson, M. A.; Spencer, W. F.; Ernst, F. F. Effect of soil properties on degradation and sorption of methyl bromide in soil. Chemosphere 1994, 29, 2685-2700.
9. Martin, F. N. Development of alternative strategies for management of soilbornepathogens currently controlled with methyl bromide. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2003, 41, 325-350.
10. Mazzola, M.; Granatstein, D. M.; Elfving, D. C.; Mullinix, K.; Gu, Y.-H. Cultural management of microbial community structure to enhance growth of apple in replant soils. Phytopathology 2002, 92, 1363-1366.
11. Duniway, J.M. Statusofchemicalalternativestomethylbromidefor pre-plantfumigation of soil. Phytopathology. 2002, 92, 1337-1343.
12. Wilhelm, S.; Paulus, A. O. How soil fumigation benefits the California strawberry industry. Plant Dis. 1980, 64, 264-270.
13. Yuen, G. Y.; Schroth, M. N.; Hancock, J. G.; Weinhold, A. R. Differential effects of various preplant soil treatments on the root microflora, root growth and yield of strawberry. Phytopathology 1988,78,1545.
14. Martin, F. N. The influence of root pathogens and specific rhizosphere microflora on root and shoot growth of strawberry. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 1998, 88, (suppl.), S 48.
15. Martin, F. N. Pathogenicity and virulence of Pythium spp. And binucleate rhizoctonia isolates from California strawberry production fields. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 1999, 89 suppl.), S49.
16. Xiao, C. L.; Duniway, J. M. Bacterial population response to soil fumigation and their effects on strawberry growth. Phytopathology 1998,88 (suppl.), S100.
17. Muyzer, G.; De Waal, E. C.; Uitterlinden, A. G. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reactionamplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59, 695-700.
18. Ibekwe, A. M., Papiernik, S. K.; Grieve, C. M.; Yang, C.-H. Influence of fumigants on soil microbial diversity and survival of E. coli O157:H7. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part B. 2010, (This volume).
19. Ibekwe, A. M.; Grieve, C. M. Changes in developing plant microbial community structure as affected by contaminated water FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2004, 48, 239-248
20. Hoagland, D. T.; Arnon, D. I. The water culture methods for growing plants without soil. Circ. 237 (revised): University of California (Berkeley) Agriculture Experiment Station. Berkeley, CA, 1950.
21. Ibekwe, A. M., Papiernik, S. K.; Grieve, C. M.; Yang, C.-H. Persistence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on the rhizosphere and phyllosphere of lettuce. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 49,784-790.
22. Øverås, L.; Forney, L.; Daae, F. L.; Torsvik, T. Distribution of bacterioplankton in meromictic Lake Saelenvannet as determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified gene fragments coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63,3367-3373.
23. Ibekwe, A. M.; Papiernik, S. K.; Gan, J.; Yates, S. R. Yang, C.-H.; Crowley, D. E. Impact of fumigants on soil microbial communities.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 3245-3257.
24. SAS Institute. SAS user's guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Cary: NC, 2005.
25. Shannon, C. E.; Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, 1963.
26. Gagliardi, J. V.; Karns, J. S. Persistence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in soil and on plant roots. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 4, 89-96.
27. Yang, C-H.; Crowley, D. E.; Borneman, J.; Keen, N. T. Microbial phyllosphere populations are more complex than previously realized. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc. USA 2001, 98, 3889-3894.
28. El Fantroussi, S.; Verschuere, L.; Verstraete, W.; Top, E. M. Effect ofphenylurea herbicides on soil microbial communities estimated by analysis of 16S rRNA gene fingerprints and community-level physiological profiles. Appl. Environ Microbiol. 1999, 65, 982-988.
29. Garland, J. L. Analysis and interpretation of community-level phys-iologicalprofiles in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1997, 24,289-300.
30. Smalla, K.; Wachtendorf, U.; Heuer, H.; Liu, W.; Forney, L. Analysis of BIOLOG GN substrate utilization patterns by microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 1220-1225.
31. Hirano, S. S.; Upper, C. D. Bacteria in the leaf ecosystem with emphasis on Pseudomonas syringae pv. Syringae-a pathogen, ice nucleus, and epiphyte. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64, 624-653.