Quantitative and qualitative methods for psychotherapy research: Introduction to special section

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 19, Issue 4-5, 2009, Pages 369-373

  Lutz, Wolfgang ^a,b   Hill, Clara E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RESEARCH;

HUMANS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RESEARCH;

EID: 77953161595     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10503300902948053     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Berkeljon, A., and Baldwin, S. (2009). An introduction to metaanalysis for psychotherapy outcome research. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 511-518.
2. Beutler, L., and Howard, K. I. (1998). Clinical utility research: An introduction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 297-301.
3. Borgen, F. H. (1992). Expanding scientific paradigms in counselling psychology. In S. D. Brown and R. W. Lent (Eds), Handbook of counselling psychology (2nd ed) (pp. 111-139). New York: Wiley.
4. Carrig, M., Kolden, G., and Strauman, T. (2009). Using functional magnetic resonance imaging in psychotherapy research: A brief introduction to concepts, methods, and task selection. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 409-417.
5. Diener, M., Hilsenroth, M., and Weinberger, J. (2009). A primer on meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: The relationship between patient-reported therapeutic alliance and adult attachment style as an illustration. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 519-526.
6. Doucette, A., and Wolf, A. (2009). Questioning the measurement precision of psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 374-389.
7. Eid, M., Geiser, C., and Nussbeck, F. (2009). Multitrait-multimethod analysis in psychotherapy research: New methodological approaches. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 390-396.
8. Elliott, R. (1989). Comprehensive process analysis: Understanding the change process in significant therapy events. In M. J. Packer and R. B. Addison (Eds), Entering the circle: Hermeneutic investigation in psychology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
9. Elliott, R., Partyka, R., Wagner, J., Alperin, R., Dobrenski, R., Messer, S., Watson, J., and Castonguay, L. G. (2009). An adjudicated hermeneutic single case efficacy design study of experiential therapy for panic/phobia. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 543-557.
10. Fischer, C. (2009). Bracketing as two movements: Identification of assumptions and continual reflexive process. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 583-590.
11. Gallop, R., and Tasca, G. (2009). Multilevel modeling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers II: The complexities. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 438-452.
12. Giorgi, A. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 8-22). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
13. Goldman, L. (1976). A revolution in counseling research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23, 543-552.
14. Goldman, L. (1979). Research is more than technology. The Counseling Psychologist, 8, 41-44.
15. Greenberg, L. S. (2007). A guide to conducting task analysis of psychotherapeutic change. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 15-30.
16. Hartmann, A., van der kooij Anita, J., and Zeeck, A. (2009). Exploring nonlinear relations: Models of clinical decision making by regression with optimal scaling. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 482-492.
17. Hill, C. E., and Gronsky, B. (1984). Research: Why and how? In J. M. Whiteley, N. Kagan, L. W. Harmon, B. R. Fretz and F. Tanney (Eds), The coming decade in counseling psychology (pp. 149-159). Schenectady, NY: Character Research Press.
18. Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S., and Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 196-205.
19. Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., and Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517-572.
20. Hoshmand, L. L. S. T. (1989). Alternate research paradigms: A review and teaching proposal. The Counseling Psychologist, 17, 3-79.
21. Howard, G. S. (1983). Toward methodological pluralism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 19-21.
22. Iwakabe, S. (2009). From single case studies to practice-based knowledge: Aggregating and synthesizing case studies. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 601-611.
23. Jacobson, N. S., and Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
24. Kazdin, A. (2009). Understanding how and why psychotherapy leads to change. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 418-428.
25. Kenny, D., and Hoyt, W. (2009). Multiple levels of analysis in psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 462-468.
26. Kiesler, D. J. (1973). The process of psychotherapy. Chicago: Aldine.
27. Knox, S., and Burkard, A. W. (2009). Qualitative research interviews. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 566-575.
28. Lambert, M. J., and Ogles, B. (2009). Using clinical significance in psychotherapy outcome research: The need for a common procedure and validity data. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 493-501.
29. Lutz, W., Leach, C., Barkham, M., Lucock, M., Stiles, W. B., Evans, C., et al. (2005). Predicting change for individual psychotherapy clients on the basis of their nearest neighbors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 904-913.
30. Lutz, W., Stulz, N., Martinovich, Z., Leon, S., and Saunders, S. M. (2009). Methodological background of decision rules and feedback tools for outcomes management in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 502-510.
31. Morrow-Bradley, C., and Elliott, R. (1986). Utitlization of psychotherapy research by practicing psychotherapists. American Psychologist, 41, 188-197.
32. Neimeyer, G., and Resnikoff, A. (1982). Qualitative strategies in counseling research. The Counseling Psychologist, 10(4), 75-85.
33. Newman, F., and Howard, K. I. (1991). Introduction to the special section on seeking new clinical research methods. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 8-11.
34. Pascual-Leone, A., Greenberg, L. S., and Pascual-Leone, J. (2009). Developments in task analysis: New methods to study. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 527-542.
35. Polkinghorne, E. E. (1984). Further extension of methodological diversity for counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 416-429.
36. Rennie, D. L., Phillips, J. R., and Quartaro, G. K. (1988). Grounded theory: A promising approach to conceptualization in psychology? Canadian Psychology, 29, 138-150.
37. Schielke, H., and Stiles, W. B. (2009). Creative consensus on interpretations in qualitative data: The Ward Method. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 558-565.
38. Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., and Miller, T. L. (1980). The benefits of psycho-therapy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. Tasca, G., and Gallop, R. (2009). Multilevel modeling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers I: The basics. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 429-437.
42. Tasca, G., Illing, V., Joyce, A., and Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (2009). Multilevel models for nested change data: A guide for group treatment tesearchers. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 453-461.
43. Timulak, L. (2009). Meta-analysis of qualitative studies: A tool for reviewing qualitative research findings in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 591-600.
44. Tschacher, W., and Ramseyer, F. (2009). Modeling psychotherapy process by time-series panel analysis (TSPA). Psychotherapy Research, 19, 469-481.
45. Wasserman, R., Levy, K., and Loken, E. (2009). Generalizability theory in psychotherapy research: The impact of multiple sources of variance on the dependability of psychotherapy process ratings. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 397-408.
46. Williams, E. N., and Morrow, S. L. (2009). Achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research: A pan-paradigmatic perspective. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 576-582.