Development and validation of the Supervisory Relationship Questionnaire (SRQ) in UK trainee clinical psychologists

British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 131-149

  Palomo, Marina ^a   Beinart, Helen ^b   Cooper, Myra J ^b  

^a KENT AND MEDWAY NHS AND SOCIAL CARE PARTNERSHIP TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EDUCATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MALE; MANPOWER; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; QUESTIONNAIRE; STUDENT; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; MALE; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS;

EID: 77953160847     PISSN: 01446657     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/014466509X441033     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bahrick, A. S. (1990). Role induction for counselor trainees: Effects on the Supervisory Working Alliance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 1484B.
2. Beinart, H. (2002). An exploration of the factors which predict the quality of the relationship in clinical supervision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Open University/British Psychological Society.
3. Beinart, H. (2004). Models of supervision and the supervisory relationship and their evidence base. In I. Fleming & L. Steen (Eds.), Supervision and clinical psychology: Theory, practice and perspectives (pp. 36-50). Hove: Brunner-Routledge.
4. Bennett, D., & Parry, G. (2004). A measure of psychotherapeutic competence derived from cognitive analytic therapy (CCAT). Psychotherapy Research, 27, 274-275.
5. Bernard, J. M. (1997). The discrimination model. In C. E. Watkins (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 310-327). New York: Wiley.
6. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (1998). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (2nd ed.). London: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Blackburn, I., James, I., Milne, D., Baker, C., Standart, S., Garland, A., & Reichelt, F. (2001). The revised cognitive therapy scale (CTS-R): Psychometric properties. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 431-446.
8. Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252-260.
9. Bordin, E. S. (1983). A Working Alliance Model of supervision. Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35-42.
10. Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectational bonds. London: Tavistock.
11. British Psychological Society (2007). Criteria for the accrediting of post-graduate training programmes in clinical psychology. Division of Clinical Psychology, Committee for Training in Clinical Psychology. Leicester: Author.
12. Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis. New York: Plenum.
13. Cushway, D. (1992). Stress in trainee clinical psychologists. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 169-179.
14. Cushway, D., & Knibbs, J. (2004). Trainees' and supervisors' perceptions of supervision. In I. Fleming & L. Steen (Eds.), Supervision and clinical psychology: Theory, practice and perspectives (pp. 162-185). Hove: Brunner-Routledge.
15. Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 322-329.
16. Ekstein, R., & Wallerstein, R. S. (1972). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy (2nd ed.). New York: International Universities Press.
17. Ellis, M. V., & Ladany, N. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In C. E. Watkins (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447-507). New York: Wiley.
18. Ellis, M. V., Ladany, N., Krengel, M., & Schultz, D. (1996). Clinical supervision research from 1981 to 1993: A methodological critique. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 43, 35-50.
19. Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20. Fleming, I., & Steen, L. (2004). Supervision and clinical psychology: Theory practice and perspectives. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.
21. Freidlander, M. L., & Ward, L. G. (1984). Development and validation of the supervisory styles inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 541-557.
22. Green, D., & Youngson, S. (2003). Discussion paper regarding DCP policy on continued supervision. Leicester: Division of Clinical Psychology, British Psychological Society.
23. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1995). Multivariate data analysis. London: Prentice-Hall International.
24. Henderson, C. E., Cawyer, C., Stringer, C. E., &Watkins, C. E. (1999). A comparison of student and supervisor perceptions of effective practicum supervision. Clinical Supervisor, 18, 47-74.
25. Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Holloway, E. L. (1997). Structures for the analysis and teaching of supervision. In C. E. Watkins (Ed.), Handbook of Psychotherapy Supervision (pp. 249-276). New York: Wiley.
27. Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1986). The development of the Working Alliance Inventory. In L. S. Greengerg &W. M. Pinsof (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 529-556). New York: Guilford.
28. Ladany, N. (2004). Psychotherapy supervision: What lies beneath? psychotherapy research, 14, 1-19.
29. Ladany, N., Ellis, M. V., & Friedlander, M. L. (1999). The Supervisory Working Alliance, trainee self-efficacy and satisfaction. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 447-455.
30. Ladany, N., & Friedlander, M. L. (1995). The relationship between the Supervisory Working Alliance and supervisee role conflict and role ambiguity. Counselor Education and Supervision, 34, 220-231.
31. Ladany, N., Lehrman-Waterman, D., Molinaro, M., & Wolgast, B. (1999). Psychotherapy supervisor ethical practices: Adherence to guidelines, the Supervisory Working Alliance, and supervisee satisfaction. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 443-475.
32. Lehrman-Waterman, D., & Ladany, N. (2001). Development and validation of the evaluation process within supervision inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 168-177.
33. Magnuson, S., Wilcoxon, S. E., & Korem, K. (2000). A profile of lousy supervision: Experienced counselors' perspectives. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39, 189-203.
34. Milne, D. (2007). An empirical definition of clinical supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 437-447. doi:10.1348/ 014466507X197415. (Pubitemid 350225898)
35. Norcross, J. C. (Ed.), (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Olk, M., & Friedlander, M. L. (1992). Trainees' experience of role conflict and role ambiguity in supervisory relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 389-397.
37. Palomo, M. (2004). Development and validation of a questionnaire measure of the supervisory relationship (SRQ). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oxford University.
38. Pistole, M. C., & Watkins, C. E. (1995). Attachment theory, counseling process, and supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 23, 457-478.
39. Riggs, S. A., & Bretz, K. M. (2006). Attachment processes in the supervisory relationship: An exploratory investigation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 347-354.
40. Roth, A., & Fonagy, P. (2006). What Works for Whom? A Critical Review of Psychotherapy Research. New York: Guilford.
41. Schacht, A. J., Howe, H. E., & Berman, J. J. (1988). A short form of the Barrett-Lennard relationship inventory for supervisory relationships. Psychological Reports, 63, 699-706.
42. Stoltenberg, C. D., McNeill, B.W., & Delworth, U. (1998). Integrated developmental model (IDM) supervision: An integrated developmental model for supervising counsellors and therapists. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2003). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
44. Wampold, B. E., & Holloway, E. L. (1997). Methodology, design and evaluation in psychotherapy supervision research. In C. E. Watkins (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 11-27). New York: Wiley.
45. Watkins, C. E. (Ed.), (1997). Handbook of psychotherapy supervision. New York: Wiley.
46. White, V. E., & Queener, J. (2003). Supervisor and supervisee attachments and social provisions related to the Supervisory Working Alliance. Counselor Education and Supervision, 42, 203-218.
47. Worthen, V., & McNeill, B. W. (1996). A phenomenological investigation of 'good' supervision events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 25-34.