Progress testing in german speaking countries

Medical Teacher

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 467-470

  Nouns, Zineb M ^a   Georg, Waltraud ^b  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b HELIOS Kliniken GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; GERMANY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LANGUAGE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; STANDARD;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; GERMANY; INTERNATIONALITY; LANGUAGE; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 77953158469     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.485656     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Arnold L, Willoughby TL. 1990. The quarterly profile examination. Acad Med 65(8):515-516.
2. Case SM, Swanson DB. 2002. Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences. 3rd revised ed. Philadelphia: NBME.
3. Haladyna TM. 2004. Developing and validating multiple-choice test items. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Klawohn J. 2008. Short paper presentation Otway 2, Do students write proper MCQs? Ottawa Conference Melbourne 2008, March 7.
5. Muijtjens AM, Schuwirth LW, Cohen-Schotanus J, van der Vleuten CP. 2007. Origin bias of test items compromises the validity and fairness of curriculum comparisons. Med Educ 41:1217-1223.
6. Nouns Z, Hanfler S, Brauns K, Foeller T, Fuhrmann S, Koelbel S, Mertens A, Mueller B, Wieland D, Osterberg K. Do progress tests predict the outcome of national exams? AMEE Conference 2004 Edinburgh, Short Communication 2F3.
7. Osterberg K, Kölbel S, Brauns K. 2006. Der Progress Test Medizin: Erfahrungen an derCharité [Title in English]. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 23(3): Doc46.
8. Rodriguez MC. 2005. Three options are optimal for multiple-choice items: A meta-analysis of 80 years of research. Educ Meas Issues Pract 24(2):3-13.