Measures of analysis of time series (MATS): A MATLAB toolkit for computation of multiple measures on time series data bases

Journal of Statistical Software

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1-30

  Kugiumtzis, Dimitris ^a   Tsimpiris, Alkiviadis ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Change detection; Data bases; MATLAB software; Nonlinear dynamics; Statistical measures; Surrogate data; Time series analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953151938     PISSN: 15487660     EISSN: 15487660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18637/jss.v033.i05     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abarbanel HDI (1996). Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data. Springer-Verlag, New York.
2. Álvarez Díaz M (2008). Exchange Rates Forecasting: Global or Local Methods? Applied Economics, 40(15), 1969-1984.
3. Andrzejak RG, Mormann F, Widman G, Kreuz T, Elger CE, Lehnertz K (2006). Improved Spatial Characterization of the Epileptic Brain by Focusing on Nonlinearity. Epilepsy Research, 69, 30-44.
4. Bao D, Yang Z (2008). Intelligent Stock Trading System by Turning Point Confirming and Probabilistic Reasoning. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 620-627.
5. Box GEP, Cox DR (1964). An Analysis of Transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 42, 71-78.
6. Box GEP, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC (1994). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
7. Cellucci CJ, Albano AM, Rapp PE (2005). Statistical Validation of Mutual Information Calculations: Comparison of Alternative Numerical Algorithms. Physical Review E, 71, 066208.
8. Edgar EP (1996). Chaos and Order in the Capital Markets: A New View of Cycles, Prices, and Market Volatility. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
9. Farmer JD, Sidorowich JJ (1987). Predicting Chaotic Time Series. Physical Review Letters, 59,845-848.
10. Garciá-Ferrer A, Queralt RA (1998). Can Univariate Models Forecast Turning Points in Seasonal Economic Time Series? International Journal of Forecasting, 14(4), 433-446.
11. Gevins AS, Rémond A (eds.) (1987). Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals, volume 1 of Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, NY.
12. Grassberger P, Procaccia I, (1983). Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors. Physica D, 9, 189-208.
13. Hallin M, Puri ML (1992). Rank Tests for Time Series Analysis: a Survey. In DR Brillinger, E Parzen, M Rosenblatt (eds.), New Directions in Time Series Analysis, pp. 112-153. Springer-Verlag, New York.
14. Hegger R, Kantz H (1999). Improved False Nearest Neighbor Method to Detect Determism in Time Series Data. Physical Review E, 60(4), 4970-4973.
15. Hegger R, Kantz H, Schreiber T (1999). Practical Implementation of Nonlinear Time Series Methods: The TISEAN Package. Chaos, 9, 413-435.
16. Hinich MJ (1996). Testing for Dependence in the Input to a Linear Time Series Model. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 6, 205-221.
17. Hjellvik V, Tjøstheim D (1995). Nonparametric Tests of Linearity for Time Series. Biometrika, 82(2), 351-368.
18. Hjorth B (1970). EEG Analysis Based on Time Domain Properties. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 29, 306-310.
19. Insightful Corp (2003). S-PLUS Version 6.2. Seattle, WA. URL http://www.insightful.com/.
20. Kantz H, Schreiber T (1997). Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Kay SM (1988). Modern Spectral Estimation: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
22. Kennel M, Brown R, Abarbanel HDI (1992). Determining Embedding Dimension for Phase-Space Reconstruction Using a Geometrical Construction. Physical Review A, 45, 3403-3411.
23. Kugiumtzis D (2001). On the Reliability of the Surrogate Data Test for Nonlinearity in the Analysis of Noisy Time Series. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 11(7), 1881-1896.
24. Kugiumtzis D (2002a). "State Space Local Linear Prediction." In A Soofi, L Cao (eds.), Modelling and Forecasting Financial Data, Techniques of Nonlinear Dynamics, chapter 4, pp. 95-113. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. Kugiumtzis D (2002b). Surrogate Data Test for Nonlinearity Using Statically Transformed Autoregressive Process. Physical Review E, 66, 025201.
26. Kugiumtzis D (2002c). "Surrogate Data Test on Time Series." In A Soofi, L Cao (eds.), Modelling and Forecasting Financial Data, Techniques of Nonlinear Dynamics, chapter 12, pp. 267-282. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27. Kugiumtzis D (2008). Evaluation of Surrogate and Bootstrap Tests for Nonlinearity in Time Series. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 12(4).
28. Kugiumtzis D, Kehagias A, Aifantis EC, Neuhaüser H (2004). Statistical Analysis of the Extreme Values of Stress Time Series from the Portevin-Le Châtelier Effect. Physical Review E, 70(3), 036110.
29. Kugiumtzis D, Lingjærde OC, Christophersen N (1998). Regularized Local Linear Prediction of Chaotic Time Series. Physica D, 112, 344-360.
30. Kugiumtzis D, Papana A, Tsimpiris A, Vlachos I, Larsson PG (2006). Time Series Feature Evaluation in Discriminating Preictal EEG States. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4345,298-310.
31. Kugiumtzis D, Vlachos I, Papana A, Larsson PG (2007). Assessment of Measures of Scalar Time Series Analysis in Discriminating Preictal States. International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism, 9(3), 134-145.
32. Lempel A, Ziv J (1976). On the Complexity of Finite Sequences. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 22, 75-81.
33. Mandelbrot B (1997). Fractals and Scaling in Finance. Springer-Verlag, New York.
34. McCullough BD, Renfro CG (1998). Benchmarks and Software Standards: A Case Study of GARCH Procedures. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 25, 59-71.
35. McSharry PE, Smith LA, Tarassenko L (2003). Comparison of Predictability of Epileptic Seizures by a Linear and a Nonlinear Method. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 50(5), 628-633.
36. Mormann F, Kreuz T, Rieke C Andrzejak RG, Kraskov A, David P, Elger CE, Lehnertz K (2005). On the Predictability of Epileptic Seizures. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(3), 569-587.
37. Papana A, Kugiumtzis D (2008). Evaluation of Mutual Information Estimators on Nonlinear Dynamic Systems. Complex Phenomena in Nonlinear Systems, 11(2), 225-232.
38. Peng CK, Buldyrev SV, Havlin S, Simons M, Stanley HE, Goldberger AL (1994). Mosaic Organization of DNA Nucleotides. Physical Review E, 49(2), 1685-1689.
39. Pincus SM (1991). Approximate Entropy as a Measure of System Complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 88, 2297-2301.
40. Politis DN (2003). The Impact of Bootstrap Methods on Time Series Analysis. Statistical Science, 18(2), 219-230.
41. Radhakrishnan N, James WD, Loizou PC (2000). An Alternate Partitioning Technique to Quantify the Regularity of Complex Time Series. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 10(7), 1773-1779.
42. Risso WA (2009). The Informational Efficiency: the Emerging Markets versus the Developed Markets. Applied Economics Letters, 16(5), 485-487.
43. SAS Institute Inc (2003). The SAS System, Version 9.1. Cary, NC. URL http://www.sas.com/.
44. Schlögl A (2002). Time Series Analysis - A Toolbox for the Use with MATLAB. Technische Universität Graz. URL http://www.dpmi.tu-graz.ac.at/schloegl/matlab/tsa/.
45. Schreiber T, Schmitz A (1996). Improved Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Tests. Physical Review Letters, 77, 635-638.
46. Schreiber T, Schmitz A (1997). Discrimination Power of Measures for Nonlinearity in a Time Series. Physical Review E, 55(5), 5443-5447.
47. Schreiber T, Schmitz A (2000). Surrogate Time Series. Physica D, 142(3-4), 346-382.
48. Shechter G (2004). "The k-D tree MATLAB Distribution." URL http://www.mathworks.co.uk/matlabcentral/fileexchange/4586.
49. SPSS Inc (2006). SPSS for Windows, Release 15. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL. URL http://www.spss.com/.
50. The MathWorks, Inc (2007). MATLAB - The Language of Technical Computing, Version 7.5. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts. URL http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/.
51. Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B (1992). Testing for Nonlinearity in Time Series: the Method of Surrogate Data. Physica D, 58, 77-94.
52. Tong H (1990). Non-Linear Time Series: A Dynamical System Approach. Oxford University Press, New York.
53. Zhao Y, Small M, Coward D, Howell E, Zhao CN, Ju L, Blair DG (2006). Identifying Deterministic Signals in Simulated Gravitational Wave Data: Algorithmic Complexity and Surrogate Data Method. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23, 1801-1814.