![]() |
Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 761-763
|
Testing whether the epidural works: Too time consuming?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADRENALIN;
BUPIVACAINE;
MEPIVACAINE;
MORPHINE;
SUFENTANIL;
LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;
NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT;
ABDOMINAL SURGERY;
ARTICLE;
EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA;
EPIDURAL CATHETER;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA;
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
ABDOMEN;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COLD;
DEVICE FAILURE;
DEVICES;
DIAGNOSTIC USE;
DRUG EFFECTS;
PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE;
PHYSIOLOGY;
PROCEDURES;
SENSATION;
SURGERY;
TEMPERATURE SENSE;
TIME;
TREATMENT FAILURE;
ABDOMEN;
ANALGESICS, OPIOID;
ANESTHESIA, EPIDURAL;
ANESTHETICS, LOCAL;
BUPIVACAINE;
COLD TEMPERATURE;
EPINEPHRINE;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE;
HUMANS;
MEPIVACAINE;
PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE;
SENSATION;
SUFENTANIL;
THERMOSENSING;
TIME FACTORS;
TREATMENT FAILURE;
|
EID: 77953142912
PISSN: 00015172
EISSN: 13996576
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02189.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (18)
|
References (5)
|