Regional myosin heavy chain distribution in selected paraspinal muscles

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 13, 2010, Pages 1265-1270

  Regev, Gilad J ^a   Kim, Choll W ^b   Thacker, Bryan E ^a   Tomiya, Akihito ^a   Garfin, Steven R ^a   Ward, Samuel R ^a   Lieber, Richard L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Spine Research Institute of San Diego   (United States)

Author keywords

Lumbar multifidus; Lumbar spine; Muscle mechanics

Indexed keywords

MYOSIN HEAVY CHAIN;

AGED; ARTICLE; BACK MUSCLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MUSCLE BIOPSY; MUSCLE CELL; MUSCLE FUNCTION; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PSOAS MUSCLE; SURGICAL APPROACH; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FAST MUSCLE FIBER; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SLOW MUSCLE FIBER;

AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ELECTROPHORESIS, POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE FIBERS, FAST-TWITCH; MUSCLE FIBERS, SLOW-TWITCH; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; MYOSIN HEAVY CHAINS; PSOAS MUSCLES;

EID: 77953136932     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bfcd98     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Pette D, Spamer C. Metabolic properties of muscle fibers. Fed Proc 1986;45:2910-4.
2. Pereira Sant'Ana JA, Ennion S, Sargeant AJ, et al. Comparison of the molecular, antigenic and ATPase determinants of fast myosin heavy chains in rat and human: a single-fibre study. Pflugers Arch 1997;435:151-63.
3. Smerdu V, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Campione M, et al. Type IIx myosin heavy chain transcripts are expressed in type IIb fibers of human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol 1994; 267 (6 pt 1) : C1723-8.
4. Schiaffino S, Reggiani C. Molecular diversity of myofibrillar proteins: gene regulation and functional significance. Physiol Rev 1996;76:371-423.
5. Johnson MA, Polgar J, Weightman D, et al. Data on the distribution of fibre types in thirty-six human muscles: an autopsy study. J Neurol Sci 1973;18:111-29.
6. Ford D, Bagnall KM, McFadden KD, et al. Analysis of vertebral muscle obtained during surgery for correction of a lumbar disc disorder. Acta Anat (Basel) 1983;116:152-7.
7. Mannion AF. Fibre type characteristics and function of the human paraspinal muscles: normal values and changes in association with low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1999;9:363-77.
8. Donisch EW, Basmajian JV. Electromyography of deep back muscles in man. Am J Anat 1972;133:25-36.
9. Vialle R, Wicart P, Drain O, et al. The Wiltse paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine revisited: an anatomic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;445:175-80.
10. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, et al. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) : a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2006;6:435-43.
11. Talmadge RJ, Roy RR. Electrophoretic separation of rat skeletal muscle myosin heavy-chain isoforms. J Appl Physiol 1993;75:2337-40.
12. Mannion AF, Weber BR, Dvorak J, et al. Fibre type characteristics of the lumbar paraspinal muscles in normal healthy subjects and in patients with low back pain. J Orthop Res 1997;15:881-7. (Pubitemid 28121502)
13. Jorgensen K, Nicholaisen T, Kato M. Muscle fiber distribution, capillary density, and enzymatic activities in the lumbar paravertebral muscles of young men: significance for isometric endurance. Spine 1993;18:1439-50.
14. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 2003; 28 (suppl 15) : S26-35.
15. Holly LT, Schwender JD, Rouben DP, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications. Neurosurg Focus 2006;20:E6.
16. Anand N, Baron EM, Bray RS. Benefits of the paraspinal muscle-sparing approach versus the conventional midline approach for posterior nonfusion stabilization: comparative analysis of clinical and functional outcomes. SAS J 2007;1:63-7.
17. Thorstensson A, Carlson H. Fibre types in human lumbar back muscles. Acta Physiol Scand 1987;131:195-202.
18. Mattila M, Hurme M, Alaranta H, et al. The multifidus muscle in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a histochemical and morphometric analysis of intraoperative biopsies. Spine 1986;11:732-8.
19. Alaranta H, Luoto S, Heliovaara M, et al. Static back endurance and the risk of low-back pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1995;10:323-4.
20. Dolan P, Adams MA. Repetitive lifting tasks fatigue the back muscles and increase the bending moment acting on the lumbar spine. J Biomech 1998;31:713-21.
21. Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine: part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord 1992;5:390-6; discussion 397.
22. Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine: part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. J Spinal Disord 1992;5:383-9; discussion 397.
23. Bajek S, Bobinac D, Bajek G, et al. Muscle fiber type distribution in multifidus muscle in cases of lumbar disc herniation. Acta Med Okayama 2000;54:235-41.
24. Crossman K, Mahon M, Watson PJ, et al. Chronic low back pain-associated paraspinal muscle dysfunction is not the result of a constitutionally determined "adverse" fiber-type composition. Spine 2004;29:628-34.
25. Moseley GL, Hodges PW, Gandevia SC. Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements. Spine 2002;27:E29-36.
26. Lee LJ, Coppieters MW, Hodges PW. Differential activation of the thoracic multifidus and longissimus thoracis during trunk rotation. Spine 2005;30:870-6.
27. MacDonald DA, Moseley GL, Hodges PW. The lumbar multifidus: does the evidence support clinical beliefs? Man Ther 2006;11:254-63.
28. Rantanen J, Rissanen A, Kalimo H. Lumbar muscle fiber size and type distribution in normal subjects. Eur Spine J 1994;3:331-5.
29. Pette D, Staron RS. Myosin isoforms, muscle fiber types, and transitions. Microsc Res Tech 2000;50:500-9.
30. Weiss A, Schiaffino S, Leinwand LA. Comparative sequence analysis of the complete human sarcomeric myosin heavy chain family: implications for functional diversity. J Mol Biol 1999;290:61-75.
31. Delp SL, Suryanarayanan S, Murray WM, et al. Architecture of the rectus abdominis, quadratus lumborum, and erector spinae. J Biomech 2001;34:371-5.
32. Ward SR, Kim CW, Eng CM, et al. Architectural analysis and intraoperative measurements demonstrate the unique design of the multifidus muscle for lumbar spine stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:176-85.
33. Ward SR, Tomiya A, Regev G, et al. Passive mechanical properties of the lumbar multifidus muscle support its role as a stabilizer. J Biomech 2009;42:1384-9.