Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of maize-biogas and photovoltaics on a land use basis

Solar Energy

Volumn 84, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1255-1263

  Graebig, Markus ^a   Bringezu, Stefan ^b   Fenner, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b Institute for Ecological Economy Research   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biogas; Land use; LCA; Maize; Photovoltaics; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL AREAS; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; CONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGY; ECO-INDICATOR 99; ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION; ENERGY PRODUCTIONS; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL BURDENS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL PRESSURES; HEAT SUPPLY; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS; MAIZE; NON-RENEWABLE ENERGY; ORGANIC WASTES; PHOTOVOLTAICS; PV PERFORMANCE; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE; SOIL EROSION; SUSTAINABLE ENERGY;

BIOGAS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EUTROPHICATION; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; HEATING; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE; MANURES; PHOTOVOLTAIC EFFECTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; SEWAGE; SOILS;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

ACIDIFICATION; AGRICULTURAL LAND; ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; BIOGAS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EUTROPHICATION; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MAIZE; MANURE; POWER GENERATION; PRESSURE EFFECT; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SOIL EROSION; SOLID WASTE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77953131773     PISSN: 0038092X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2010.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Beadle C.L., and Long S.P. Photosynthesis - is it limiting to biomass production?. Biomass 8 (1985) 119-168
2. BMU - German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, 2008. Vergleich der EEG-Vergütungsregeln für, 2009. (accessed 12.10.08).
3. BMWi - German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology, 2008. Energie in Deutschland. (accessed 12.10.08).
4. Bringezu, S., Ramesohl, S., Arnold, K., Fischedick, M., von Geibler, J., Liedtke, C., Schütz, H., 2007. What We Know and What We Should Know. Towards a Sustainable Biomass Strategy. Wuppertal Papers 163, Wuppertal Institute.
5. DMK Deutsches Maiskomitee, 2007. Kurze Einführung zum Thema Biogas. (accessed 01.07.07).
6. EC, European Commission, 2006. Photovoltaic Solar Electricity Potential in European Countries. (accessed 30.06.07).
7. Ecoinvent Report No. 5, 2004. Life Cycle Inventories of Energy Systems: Results for Current Systems in Switzerland and other UCTE Countries. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories.
8. Ecoinvent Database Version V1.3, 2006. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories.
9. FNR Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe, 2006. Handreichung Biogasgewinnung und -nutzung, Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, 3. überarbeitete Auflage 2006.
10. Fraunhofer Institut Umsicht, 2005. Analyse und Bewertung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten von Biomasse - Band 3: Biomassevergasung, Technologien und Kosten der Gasaufbereitung und Potenziale der Biogaseinspeisung in Deutschland.
11. Gaswärme-Institut Essen, 2005. Analyse und Bewertung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten von Biomasse - Band 4: Technologien, Kosten und Restriktionen der Biogaseinspeisung ins Erdgasnetz.
12. Green M.A. Silicon photovoltaic modules: a brief history of the first 50 years. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 13 (2005) 447-455
13. Green M.A., Emery K., King D.L., Hishikawa Y., and Warta W. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 29). Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 15 (2007) 35-40
14. Hartmann, J.K., 2006. Life-cycle-assessment of industrial scale biogas plants. PhD thesis. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.
15. IE Institut für Energetik und Umwelt Leipzig, 2005. Analyse und Bewertung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten von Biomasse - Band 2: Biomassepotenziale in Deutschland, Nutzungstechniken und ökonomisch-ökologische Bewertung ausgewählter Nutzungspfade.
16. ISO 14044:2006, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2006. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines.
17. Jungbluth N. Life cycle assessment of crystalline photovoltaics in the Swiss Ecoinvent database. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 13 (2005) 429-446
18. Kalies, M., Schröder, G., 2007. Endbericht: Schlüsseldaten Klimagasemissionen - Welchen Beitrag kann die Biomasse zum Klimaschutz leisten? Institute for Energy and Environment.
19. Lal R. Soil erosion and the global carbon budget, 2003. Environment International 29 (2003) 437-450
20. LUNG Landesamt für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Geologie Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 2002. Beiträge zum Bodenschutz in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern: Bodenerosion, 2. überarbeitete Auflage, p. 85.
21. 2 Emissions of the BOS in an Optimized 3.5 MW PV Installation. Progress of Photovoltaics, May 6, 2005 (preprint).
22. Müller, A., Warmbach, K., Alsema, E., 2007. Life Cycle Analysis of a Solar Module Recycling Process. (accessed 07.06.07).
23. Nonhebel S. Renewable energy and food supply: will there be enough land?. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 9 2005 (2005) 191-201
24. Pimentel D., Allen J., Beers A., Guinand L., Linder R., McLaughlin P., Meer B., Musonda D., Perdue D., Poisson S., Siebert S., Stoner K., Salazar R., and Hawkins A. World agriculture and soil erosion: erosion threatens world food production. Bioscience 37 4 (1987) 277-283
25. Pimentel D., and Patzek T.W. Ethanol production: energy and economic issues related to U.S. and Brazilian sugarcane. Biofuels, Solar and Wind as Renewable Energy Systems (2008), Springer 357-371
26. Shalav A. Photovoltaics literature survey (no. 54). Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 15 (2007) 369-373
27. Shinners K.J., Binversie B.N., Muck R.E., and Wimer P.J. Comparison of wet and dry corn stover harvest and storage. Biomass and Bioenergy 31 (2007) 211-221
28. Solarserver, 2006. Solarstrom aus 1408 Photovoltaik-Kraftwerken: Solarpark Gut Erlasee. (accessed 14.08.07).
29. TEP, Tucson Electric Power, 2007. Technical Specification on Springerville Photovoltaics Plant. (accessed 11.07.07).
30. Thrän D., Seiffert M., Müller-Langer F., Plättner A., and Vogel A. Möglichkeiten einer europäischen Biogaseinspeisungsstrategie (2007), Institute for Energy and Environment, Leipzig
31. Weinberg Z.G., Yan Y., Chen Y., Finkelman S., Ashbell G., and Navarro S. The effect of moisture level on high-moisture maize (Zea mays L.) under hermetic storage conditions-in vitro studies. Journal of Stored Products Research 44 (2008) 136-144
32. Wild-Scholten, M.J. de, Alsema, E.A., Horst, E.W. ter, Bächler, M., Fthenakis, V.M., 2006. A cost and environmental impact comparison of grid-connected rooftop and ground-based PV systems. In: Presented at the 21st European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Dresden, Germany, 4-8 September, 2006.
33. Wolf J., Bindraban P.S., Luijten J.C., and Vleeshouwers L.M. Exploratory study on the land area required for global food supply and the potential global production of bioenergy. Agricultural Systems 76 (2003) 841-861
34. Wuppertal Institute, 2006. Analyse und Bewertung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten von Biomasse - Band 1: Gesamtergebnisse und Schlussfolgerungen, Untersuchung im Auftrag von BGW und DVGW.
35. Zhu X.-G., Long S.P., and Ort D.R. What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass?. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 19 (2008) 153-159