Comparing student performance: Online versus blended versus face-to-face

Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 31-42

  Larson, David K ^a   Sung, Chung Hsien ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b Department of Health and Human Physiology   (United States)

Author keywords

Blended; Face to face; Leaning mode comparison; No significant difference; Online

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953127736     PISSN: 19395256     EISSN: 19395256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Newlin, M. H., J. L. Lavooy & A. Y. Wang. An Experimental Comparison of Conventional and Web-based Instructional Formats. North American Journal of Psychology 7(2): 327-335, 2005.
2. Fallah, M. H. & R. Ubell. Blind Scores in a Graduate Test: Conventional Compared with Web-based Outcomes. ALN Magazine 4(2): December 2000.
3. Mascuilli, A. B. Effectiveness of Teaching Mathematics Online. ALN Magazine 4(2): December 2000.
4. Reece, M. & B. Lockee. Improving Training Outcomes Through Blended Learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(4): 49-57, December 2005.
5. Picciano, A. G. Blended Learning: Implications for Growth and Access. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10(3): 95-102, July 2006.
6. Prendergast, G. Blended Collaborative Learning: Online Teaching of Online Educators. GlobalEducator: April 2004.
7. Osguthorpe, R. T. & C. R. Graham. Blended Learning Environments Definitions and Directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4(3): 227-233, 2003.
8. Aspden, L. & P. Helm. Making the Connection in a Blended Learning Environment. Educational Media International 41(3): 245-252, January 2004.
9. Sloan C. Effective Practices, August 2005. Available online: http://www.sloan-c.org/effective/index.asp.
10. Clark, R. Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media. Review of Educational Research 53(4): 445-459, Winter, 1983.
11. Kulik, J. A., C. C. Kulik & P. A. Cohen. Effectiveness of Computer-Based College Teaching: A Meta-Analysis of Findings. Review of Educational Research 50(4): 525-544, Winter 1980.
12. Kulik, J. A., C. C. Kulik & R. L. Bangert-Drowns. Effectiveness of Computer-Based Education in Elementary Schools. Computers in Human Behavior 1: 59-74, 1985.
13. Kulik, C. C. & J. A. Kulik. Effectiveness of Computer-Based Instruction: An Updated Analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 7: 75-94, 1991.
14. Kozma, R. B. Will Media Influence Learning? Reframing the Debate. Educational Technology Research and Development 42(2): 7-19, 1994.
15. Jenks, M. S. & J. M. Springer. A View of the Research on the Efficacy of CAI. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education 1(2): 2002. http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume1No2/Jenks.htm.
16. McLuhan, M. The Medium is the Massage, First Edition, 8. New York: Bantam Books, 1967.
17. Kenny, R. Teaching, Learning, and Communicating in the Digital Age. Eric # ED470091: 2001.
18. Federman, M. What is the Meaning of The Medium is the Message? July 23, 2004. http://individual.utoronto.ca/markfederman/article_mediumisthemessage.htm.
19. Yuen-kuang, C. L. Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Students' Achievement in Taiwan: A Meta-Analysis. Computers & Education 48(2): 216-233, February 2007.
20. Cavanaugh, J. K. Are Online Courses Cannibalizing Students From Existing Courses? Journal of Asynchronous Learning 9(3): 95-102, October 2005.
21. Illinois Virtual Campus. Sharpen the Focus: Fall 2006. http://www.ivc.illinois.edu/pubs/enrollPDF/SharpenFall06.pdf.
22. Wisconsin Technical College System. Online Courses Make Education Possible for Many Students. http://www.wtcsystem.edu/news/releases/online_courses.htm.