Clinical prediction rules

Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 207-208

  Chaitow, Leon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIA; CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EDITORIAL; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; RESEARCH; SYMPTOM; TREATMENT DURATION; VALIDITY;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; MUSCULOSKELETAL MANIPULATIONS; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

EID: 77953123388     PISSN: 13608592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.04.005     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Cook C. Potential pitfalls of clinical prediction rules. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 16 2 (2008) 69
2. Falk G., and Fahey T. Clinical prediction rules. British Medical Journal 339 (2009) b2899
3. Fritz J.M., Delitto A., and Erhard R. Comparison of a classification-based approach to physical therapy and therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine 28 (2003) 1363-1372
4. Fritz J.M. Clinical prediction rules in physical therapy: coming of age?. JOSPT 39 3 (2009) 159
5. Hall H., McIntosh G., and Boyle C. Effectiveness of a low back pain classification system. The Spine Journal 9 (2009) 648-657
6. Lee, D., Lee, L.-J. Differential diagnosis and management of chronic pelvic pain. In: Chaitow, L., Lovegrove, R. (Eds.), Chronic Pelvic Pain & Dysfunction, Churchill-Livingstone, Edinburgh, in press.
7. Paatelma M., Karvqnen E., and Heinqnen A. Inter-tester reliability in classifying acute and subacute low back pain patients into clinical subgroups: a comparison of specialists and non-specialists. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 17 4 (2009) 221-229