One-stage versus two-stage implant placement. A Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials

European Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 91-99

  Esposito, Marco ^a,b   Grusovin, Maria Gabriella ^a,c   Chew, Yun Shane ^a   Coulthard, Paul ^a   Worthington, Helen V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c Private Clinical Practice   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dental implants; One stage implant placement; Randomised controlled clinical trial; Submerged implants; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77953113385     PISSN: 17562406     EISSN: 17562414     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Brånemark P-I, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1977
2. Albrektsson T, Brånemark P-I, Hansson H-A, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170
3. Brunski JB, Moccia AFJ, Pollack SR, Korostoff E, Trachtenberg DI. The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. I. Histological aspects. J Dent Res 1979;58:1953-1969
4. Buser DA, Schroeder A, Sutter F, Lang NP. The new concept of ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants: part 2. Clinical aspects, indications, and early clinical results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:173-181
5. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of nonsubmerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:33-40
6. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of prospective multicenter study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172
7. Collaert B, De Bruyn H. Comparison of Brånemark fixture integration and short-term survival using one-stage or two-stage surgery in completely and partially edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:131-135
8. Ericsson I, Randow K, Nilner K, Petersson A. Some clinical and radiographical features of submerged and non-submerged titanium implants. A 5-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:422-426
9. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Chew YS, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1-vs 2-stage implant placement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;2:CD006698
10. Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JPT, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vail A. Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31:140-149
11. Follmann D, Elliott P, Suh I, Cutler J. Variance imputation for overviews of clinical trials with continuous response. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:769-773
12. Barber HD, Seckinger RJ, Silverstein K, Abughazaleh K. Comparison of soft tissue healing and osseointegration of IMZ implants placed in one-stage and two-stage techniques: a pilot study. Implant Dent 1996;5:11-14
13. Heijdenrijk K, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Van Der Reijden WA, Van Winkelhoff AJ, Stegenga B. Two-part implants inserted in a one-stage or a two-stage procedure. A prospective comparative study. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:901-909
14. Cecchinato D, Olsson C, Lindhe J. Submerged or nonsubmerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:299-308
15. Becktor JP, Isaksson S, Billstrom C. A prospective multicenter study using two different surgical approaches in the mandible with turned Brånemark implants: conventional loading using fixed prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007;9:179-185
16. Cordaro L, Torsello F, Roccuzzo M. Clinical outcome of submerged versus non-submerged implants placed in fesh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009(in press)
17. Esposito M, Murray-Curtis L, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4:CD003815
18. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Achille H, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;2:CD003878