Smells like a new species: Gene duplication at the periphery

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 21, 2010, Pages 9481-9482

  Heckel, David G ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR CHEMICAL ECOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHEROMONE;

CROSSING OVER; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; INSECT GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOTH; NEW SPECIES; NONHUMAN; NOTE; ODOR; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SILKWORM;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; PHENOTYPE; PHEROMONES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 77953111603     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1004511107     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Gould F, et al. (2010) Sexual isolation of male moths explained by a single pheromone response QTL containing four receptor genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:8660-8665.
2. Phelan PL (1992) Evolution of sex pheromones and the role of asymmetric tracking. Insect Chemical Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, eds Roitberg BD, Isman MB (Chapman & Hall, New York), pp 265-314.
3. Roelofs WL, et al. (2002) Evolution of moth sex pheromones via ancestral genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 13621-13626.
4. Smadja C, Butlin RK (2009) On the scent of speciation: The chemosensory system and its role in premating isolation. Heredity 102:77-97.
5. Baker TC (2009) Nearest neural neighbors: Moth sex pheromone receptors HR11 and HR13. Chem Senses 34:465-468.
6. Krieger J, et al. (2009) HR11 and HR13 receptor-expressing neurons are housed together in pheromone-responsive sensilla trichodea of male Heliothis virescens. Chem Senses 34:469-477.
7. Baker TC, et al. (2004) A comparison of responses from olfactory receptor neurons of Heliothis subflexa and Heliothis virescens to components of their sex pheromone. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 190:155-165.
8. Vickers NJ (2006) Inheritance of olfactory preferences III. Processing of pheromonal signals in the antennal lobe of Heliothis subflexa x Heliothis virescens hybrid male moths. Brain Behav Evol 68:90-108.
9. Grosse-Wilde E, Gohl T, Bouché E, Breer H, Krieger J (2007) Candidate pheromone receptors provide the basis for the response of distinct antennal neurons to pheromonal compounds. Eur J Neurosci 25:2364-2373.
10. Nakagawa T, Sakurai T, Nishioka T, Touhara K (2005) Insect sex-pheromone signals mediated by specific combinations of olfactory receptors. Science 307:1638-1642.
11. Moto K, et al. (2003) Pheromone gland-specific fatty-acyl reductase of the silkmoth, Bombyx mori. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:9156-9161.
12. Lassance J-M, et al. (2010) Allelic variation in fatty-acyl reductase gene causes divergence in moth sex pheromones. Nature, 10.1038/nature09058, in press.
13. d'Alençon E, et al. (2010) Extensive synteny conservation of holocentric chromosomes in Lepidoptera despite high rates of local genome rearrangements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:7680-7685.
14. Groot AT, et al. (2009) QTL analysis of sex pheromone blend differences between two closely related moths: Insights into divergence in biosynthetic pathways. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 39:568-577.
15. Groot AT, et al. (2009) Geographic and temporal variation in moth chemical communication. Evolution 63: 1987-2003.
16. Tanaka K, et al. (2009) Highly selective tuning of a silkworm olfactory receptor to a key mulberry leaf volatile. Curr Biol 19:881-890.
17. Silkworm Genome Research Program. KAIKObase. Available at: http://sgp.dna.affrc.go.jp/KAIKObase/. Accessed April 18, 2010.