Mode of delivery and mortality among preterm newborns;Sposób porodu a umieralnoÊç przedwczeÊnie urodzonych noworodków

Ginekologia Polska

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 203-207

  Fehmi, Ahmeti ^a   Ilir, Azizi ^a   Sejdullah, Hoxha ^a   Beata, Kulik Rechberger ^b   Tomasz, Rechberger ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY CLINICAL CENTER OF KOSOVO   (Serbia)

^b Department of Pediatric Propedeutics of Medical University in Lublin ^*  (Poland)

^c II Clinic of Gynecology of Medical University in Lublin   (Poland)

Author keywords

Low birth weight; Mode of delivery; Neonates; Premature birth

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT WELFARE; MALE; MATERNAL WELFARE; MORTALITY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE LABOR; PREMATURITY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS; YUGOSLAVIA;

BIRTH WEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT WELFARE; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, PREMATURE, DISEASES; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; LABOR PRESENTATION; MALE; MATERNAL WELFARE; OBSTETRIC LABOR, PREMATURE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RISK FACTORS; YUGOSLAVIA;

EID: 77953105095     PISSN: 00170011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. McCormick M. The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. N Engl J Med. 1985, 312, 82-90.
2. Hack M, Fanaroff A. Outcomes of extremely immature infants - a perinatal dilemma. N Engl J Med. 1993, 329, 1649-1650.
3. Lockwood C. Predicting premature delivery: no easy task. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346, 282-284.
4. Guyer B, Strobino D, Ventura S, [et al.]. Annual summary of vital statistics -1994. Pediatrics. 1995, 96, 1029-1039.
5. Hack M, Taylor H, Klein N, [et al]. School-age outcomes in children with birth weights under 750g. N Engl J Med. 1994, 331, 753-759.
6. Weissman A, Blazer S, Zimmer E, [et al.]. Low birth weight breech infant: short-term and longterm outcome by method of delivery. Am J Perinatol. 1988, 5, 289-292.
7. Granati B, Rondinelli M, Capoti C, [et al.]. The premature breech presentation: outcome of newborn infants born by vaginal or abdominal delivery. Am J Perinatol. 1984, 1, 145-147.
8. Kigawa J, Goto S, Narita K, [et al.]. Studies on the mode of delivery and the outcome of small preterm infants with less than 32 weeks of gestation. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984, 36, 2629-2633.
9. Gorbe E, Chasen S, Harmath A, [et al.]. Very-low-birth weight breech infants: short-term outcome by method of delivery. J Matern Fetal Med. 1997, 6, 155-158.
10. Haque K, Hayes A, Ahmed Z, [et al.]. Caesarean or vaginal delivery for preterm very-low-birth weight (< or =1,250g) infant: experience from a district general hospital in UK. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008, 277, 207-212.
11. Fanaroff A, Hack M, Walsh M. The NICHD neonatal research network: changes in practice and outcomes during the first 15 years. Semin Perinatol. 2003, 27, 281-287.
12. ACOG committee opinion: Antenatal corticosteroid therapy for fetal maturation. Obstet Gynecol. 2002, 99, 871-873.
13. Green N, Damus K, Simpson J, [et al.]. March of Dimes Scientific Advisory Committee on Prematurity. Research agenda for preterm birth: recommendations from the March of Dimes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 193, 626-635.
14. Lorenz J, Wooliever D, Jetton J, [et al.]. A quantitative review of mortality and developmental disability in extremely premature newborns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998, 152, 425-435.
15. Zespół Programu Poprawy Opieki Perinatalnej. Program Opieki Perinatalnej w Polsce. Red. Gadzinowski J, Bre{ogonek}borowicz G. Poznań: Ośrodek Wydawnictw Naukowych, 1997.
16. Minkoff H, Grunebaum A, Schwarz R, [et al.]. Risk factors for prematurity and premature rupture of membranes: a prospective study of the vaginal flora in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984, 150, 965-972.
17. Carlan S, O'Brien W, Parsons M, [et al]. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomized study of home versus hospital management. Obstet Gynecol. 1993, 81, 61-64.
18. Andrews W, Leveno K, Sherman M, [et al]. Elective hospitalization in the management of twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1991, 77, 826-831.
19. Kociszewska-Najman B, Borek-Dziecioł B, Kulikowska-Matłosz J. Stany zagrożenia życia u noworodków urodzonych przedwcześnie. Ginekol Pol. 2003, 74, 1147-1153.
20. Lee H, Gould J. Survival advantage associated with cesarean delivery in very low birth weight vertex neonates. Obstet Gynecol. 2006, 107, 97-105.
21. Muhuri P, Macdorman M, Menacker F. Method of delivery and neonatal mortality among very low birth weight infants in the United States. Matern Child Health J. 2006, 10, 47-53.
22. Malloy M. Impact of cesarean section on neonatal mortality rates among very preterm infants in the United States, 2000-2003. Pediatrics. 2008, 122, 285-292.
23. Basso O, Baird D. Infertility and preterm delivery, birthweight, and caesarean section: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Hum Reprod. 2003, 18, 2478-2484.
24. Kilbride H. Effectiveness of neonatal intensive care for extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2004, 114, 1374-1375.
25. Riskin A, Riskin-Mashiah S, Lusky A, [et al.]. The relationship between delivery mode and mortality in very low birthweight singleton vertex-presenting infants. BJOG. 2004, 111, 1365- 1371.