Constructivist views of learning: Implications for inclusive education

The SAGE Handbook of Special Education

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 272-279

  Kugelmass, Judy W ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953099449     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781848607989.n21     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Bauersfeld, H.(1995). The structuring of the structures: Development and function of mathematizing as a social practice. In L. P.Steffe, and J.Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 137-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Berk, L., and Winsler, A.(1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
3. Berres, M., Ferguson, D., Knoblock, P., and Wood, C. (Eds.). (1996). Creating tomorrow's schools today: Stories of inclusion, change and renewal. New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Bredekamp, S., and Copple, C. (Eds.). (1987). Developmentally appropriate practices in early childhood programs. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
5. Bredekamp, S., and Copple, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developmentally appropriate practices in early childhood programs (revised ed.). Washington, DC: NAEYC.
6. Bromley, K.(2003). Finding the middle ground in literacy instruction. In B.Rainforth, and J. W.Kugelmass (Eds.), Curriculum and instruction for all learners: Blending systematic and constructivist approaches in inclusive elementary schools (pp. 79-111). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
7. Brooks, J. G., and Brooks, M. G.(1994). The case for the constructivist classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
8. Burman, S.(1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. New York: Routledge.
9. Cambourne, B.Conditions for literacy learning. The Reading Teacher 53 (1999). 126-127.
10. Clay, M. M.(1985). The early detection of reading difficulties (3rd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
11. Clay, M. M., and Cazden, C. B.(1990). A Vygotskian interpretation of Reading Recovery. In L.Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 206-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Collins, K. M.(2003). Ability profiling and school failure: One child's struggle to be seen as competent. Mah-wah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Delpit, L. D.(1995). Other people's children: Culture conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.
14. Delpit, L. D.The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review 58 (3) (1998). 280-298.
15. DeVries, R., and Zan, B.(1994) Moral classrooms, moral children: Creating a constructivist atmosphere in early education. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Englert, C. S., Garmon, A., Marriage, T., Rozendale, M., Tarant, K., and Urba, J.The Early Literacy Project: Connecting across the literacy curriculum. Remedial and Special Education 18 (1995). 253-275.
17. Fosnot, C. T.(1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T.Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practices (pp. 8-33). New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Fraiberg, S.(1977). Insights from the blind: Comparative studies of blind and sighted infants. New York: Basic Books.
19. Gallagher, D. J.The importance of constructivism and constructivist pedagogy for disability studies in education. Disability Studies Quarterly 24 (2) (2004). 1-15.
20. Goodman, Y M., and Goodman, K. S.(1990). Vygotsky in a whole language perspective. In L.Moll, (Ed.). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 223-250.)Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Knox, J., and Stevens, C.(1993). Vygotsky and Soviet Russian defectology: Translators' introduction. In R. W.Rieber, and A. S.Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotksy(Vol. 2, pp. 1-25). New York: Plenum.
22. Kugelmass, J. W.(2005). The inclusive school: Sustaining equity and standards. New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Ladson-Billings, G.(1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Lane, H.(1976). The wild boy of Aveyron. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Mallory, B., and New, R.(1996). Diversity and Developmentally appropriate practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Moll, L. (Ed.). (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Montessori, M.(1964). The Montessori method. New York: Schocken Books.
28. Northeast Foundation for Children. (n. d.). Responsive classroom. (Accessed February 2005)http://www.responsiveclassroom.org
29. Palinscar, A. S., and Brown, A. L.Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1 (1984). 117-175.
30. Palinscar, A. S., Collins, K. M., Marano, N. L., and Mag-nusson, S. J.Investigating the engagement and learning of students with learning disabilities in guided inquiry science teaching. Language, Speech, and Learning Services in Schools 31 (2000). 240-251.
31. Perkins, D.The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership 57 (3) (1999). 6-11.
32. Piaget, J.(1963). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.
33. Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B.(1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
34. Poplin, M. S.The reductionist fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities 21 (1988). 389-400.
35. Rainforth, B., and Kugelmass, J. W. (Eds.). (2003). Curriculum and instruction for all learners: Blending systematic and constructivist approaches in inclusive elementary schools. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
36. Rankin-Erickson, J. L.A survey of instructional practices of special education teachers nominated as effective teachers of literacy. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 15 (4) (2000). 206-255.
37. Schifter, D.(1996). A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning mathematics. In C. T.Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practices (pp. 73-91). New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Schmittau, J.(2003). Beyond constructivism and back to basics: A cultural historical alternative to the teaching of the base ten positional system In B.Rainforth, and J. W.Kugelmass (Eds.), Curriculum and instruction for all learners: Blending systematic and constructivist approaches in inclusive elementary schools (pp. 113-132). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
39. Stainback, S., and Stainback, W. (Eds.). (1992). Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms: Facilitating learning for all students. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
40. Trent, S. C., Artiles, A. J., and Englert, C. S.From deficit thinking to social constructivism: A review of theory, research, and practice in special education. Review of Research in Special Education 23 (1998). 277-307.
41. Van der Veer, R., and Valsiner, J.(1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
42. Von Glaserfeld, E.(1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In L P.Steffe, and J.Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 3-16). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Von Glaserfeld, E.(1998). Why constructivism must be radical. In M.Larochelle, N.Bednarz, and J.Garrison (Eds.), Constructivism and education (pp. 23-28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511752865.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752865.003
44. Vygotsky, L. S.(1962). Language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.doi:10.1037/11193-000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/11193-000
45. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Vygotsky, L. S.(1993). Introduction: The fundamentals of defectology. In R. W.Rieber, and A. S.Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotksy(Vol. 2, pp. 29-93). New York: Plenum.
47. Walkerdine, V.(1984). Developmental psychology and the child-centered pedagogy: the insertion of Piaget into early education. In J.Henriques, W.Hollyway, C.Urwin, C.Venn, and V.Walkerdine (Eds), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 152-202). London: Methuen.
48. Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.). (1985a). Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Wertsch, J. V.(1985b). Vygotsky and the social formation of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Wood, T., Cobb, P., and Yackel, E.(1995). Reflections on learning and teaching mathematics in elementary school. In L. P.Steffe, and J.Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 401-422). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.