A comparison of two techniques to augment maxillary sinuses using the lateral window approach: Rigid synthetic resorbable barriers versus anorganic bovine bone. Five-month post-loading clinical and histological results of a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial

European Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 293-306

  Felice, Pietro ^a   Scarano, Antonio ^b   Pistilli, Roberto ^c   Checchi, Luigi ^a   Piattelli, Maurizio ^b   Pellegrino, Gerardo ^a   Esposito, Marco ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^c SAN FILIPPO NERI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Anorganic bovine bone; Resorbable barrier; Sinus lift

Indexed keywords

BIO OSS; BIO-OSS; LACTIC ACID; MINERAL; POLYGLYCOLIC ACID; POLYLACTIC ACID POLYGLYCOLIC ACID COPOLYMER; POLYLACTIC ACID-POLYGLYCOLIC ACID COPOLYMER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REGENERATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG EFFECT; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL SURGERY; PERIODONTICS; PILOT STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ADULT; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION, PERIODONTAL; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; LACTIC ACID; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MIDDLE AGED; MINERALS; ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES, PREPROSTHETIC; PILOT PROJECTS; POLYGLYCOLIC ACID; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77953094871     PISSN: 17562406     EISSN: 17562414     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, Karasoulos D, Felice P, Alissa R, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:in press
2. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:328-343
3. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:565-577
4. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22 (Suppl):49-70
5. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-616
6. Ellegaard B, Kølsen-Petersen J, Baelum V. Implant therapy involving maxillary sinus lift in periodontally compromised patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:305-315
7. Lundgren S, Andersson S, Gualini F, Sennerby L. Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:165-173
8. Nedir R, Bischof M, Vazquez L, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP. Osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting material: a 1-year prospective pilot study with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:679-686
9. Sohn DS, Lee JS, Ahn MR, Shin HI. New bone formation in the maxillary sinus without bone grafts. Implant Dent 2008;17:321-331
10. Thor A, Sennerby L, Hirsch JM, Rasmusson L. Bone formation at the maxillary sinus floor following simultaneous elevation of the mucosal lining and implant installation without graft material: an evaluation of 20 patients treated with 44 Astra Tech implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:64-72
11. Hatano N, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. Maxillary sinus augmentation using sinus membrane elevation and peripheral venous blood for implant-supported rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla: case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007;9:150-155
12. Felice P, Checchi V, Pistilli R, Scarano A, Pellegrino G, Esposito M. Bone augmentation versus 5 mm dental implants in posterior atrophic jaws. Four-month post-loading results from a randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009;2:267-281
13. Zwahlen RA, Cheung LK, Zheng LW, Chow RL, Li T, Schuknecht B, et al. Comparison of two resorbable membrane systems in bone regeneration after removal of wisdom teeth: a randomized-controlled clinical pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1084-1091
14. Tatum HJ. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:207-229
15. Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:635-643
16. Felice P, Marchetti C, Piattelli A, Pellegrino G, Checchi V, Worthington H, et al. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone. Results up to delivery of the final prostheses from a splitmouth, randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2008;1:183-198