A framework for trusted instruction execution via basic block signature verification

Proceedings of the Annual Southeast Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 191-196

  Milenković, Milena ^a   Milenković, Aleksandar ^a   Jovanov, Emil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer security; Intrusion detection; Trusted execution

Indexed keywords

BASIC BLOCKS; COMPUTER SECURITY; EXPOSING SYSTEMS; LOCAL NETWORKS; MALICIOUS CODES; NEGATIVE IMPACTS; PROGRAM BINARY; RUN-TIME VERIFICATION; SIGNATURE FUNCTION;

NETWORK SECURITY; SECURITY SYSTEMS;

INTRUSION DETECTION;

EID: 77953085315     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/986537.986582     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. J. Wilander, M. Kamkar. A Comparison of Publicly Available Tools for Dynamic Buffer Overflow Prevention. In Proceedings of the 10th Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, San Diego, CA, February 2003, pp. 149-162.
2. G.E. Suh, J. Lee, and S. Devadas. Secure Program Execution via Dynamic Information Flow Tracking. Technical Report MIT-LCS-TR-912, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, 2003.
3. A. Milenkovic and M. Milenkovic. Exploiting Streams in Instruction and Data Address Trace Compression. In Proceedings of IEEE 6th Annual Workshop on Workload Characterization, Austin, TX, October 2003, pp. 99-107.
4. SPEC 2000 Benchmark Suite, http://www.spec.org
5. D. Wagner, J. S. Foster, E. A. Brewer, and A. Aiken. A First Step Towards Automated Detection of Buffer Overrun Vulnerabilities. In Proceedings of Networking and Distributed System Security Symposium 2000, San Diego, CA, February 2000.
6. D. Kirovski, M. Drinic, and M. Potkonjak. Enabling Trusted Software Integrity. In Proceedings of ASPLOS, San Jose, CA, 2002, pp. 108-120.
7. C. Warrender, S. Forrest, and B. Pearlmutter. Detecting Intrusions Using System Calls: Alternative Data Models. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Oakland, CA, 1999, pp. 133-145.
8. I. Sato, Y. Okazaki, and S. Goto. An Improved Intrusion Detection Method Based on Process Profiling. IPSJ Journal, Vol.43, No.11, pp. 3316-3326, November 2002.
9. R. Sekar, T. Bowen and M. Segal. On Preventing Intrusions by Process Behavior Monitoring. In Eighth USENIX Security Symposium, Washington, DC, Aug 1999, pp. 29-40.
10. S. A. Hofmeyr, S. Forrest and A. Somayaji. Intrusion Detection using Sequences of System Calls. Journal of Computer Security,s Vol. 6, 1998, pp. 151-180.
11. D. L. Oppenheimer and M. R. Martonosi. Performance Signatures: A Mechanism for Intrusion Detection. In Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Information Survivability Workshop, San Diego, CA, 1997.
12. J. Xu, Z. Kalbarczyk, S. Patel and R. K. Iyer. Architecture Support for Defending Against Buffer Overflow Attacks. In Proceedings of Workshop on Evaluating and Architecting System Dependability (EASY), San Jose, California, October 2002.
13. C. Collberg and C. Thomborson. Watermarking, Tamper-Proofing, and Obfuscation - Tools for Software Protection. IEEE Transactions on software engineering, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 735-746, August 2002.