Performance analysis of the OneTouch® UltraVue™ blood glucose monitoring system

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1158-1165

  Chang, Anna ^a   Orth, Alice ^b   Le, Bryan ^c   Menchavez, Perla ^c   Miller, Lupe ^c  

^a John Muir Physician Network Clinical Research Center   (United States)

^b Diabetes Society   (United States)

^c LifeScan Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Blood glucose meter; OneTouch UltraVue; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE OXIDASE;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL TRIAL; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MALE; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; NOTE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEST STRIP; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CALIFORNIA; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; GLUCOSE OXIDASE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REAGENT STRIPS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953074552     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300521     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1047-53. (Pubitemid 38579764)
2. Rodbard HW, Blonde L, Braithwaite SS, Brett EM, Cobin RH, Handelsman Y, Hellman R, Jellinger PS, Jovanovic LG, Levy P, Mechanick JI, Zangeneh F, AACE Diabetes Mellitus Clinical Practice Guidelines Task Force. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the management of diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pract. 2007;13 Suppl 1:1-68.
3. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2008. Diabetes Care. 2008;31 Suppl 1:S12-54.
4. Bergenstal RM, Gavin JR III, Global Consensus Conference on Glucose Monitoring Panel. The role of self-monitoring of blood glucose in the care of people with diabetes: report of a global consensus conference. Am J Med. 2005;118(Suppl 9A):1S-6S. (Pubitemid 41446936)
5. Kempf K, Neukirchen W, Martin S, Kolb H. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: a new look at published trials. Diabetologia. 2008;51(4):686-8.
6. Arabadjief D, Nichols JH. Assessing glucose meter accuracy. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22(11):2167-74. (Pubitemid 44789981)
7. Young JK, Ellison JM, Marshall R. Performance evaluation of a new blood glucose monitor that requires no coding: the OneTouch® Vita™ system. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(5):814-8.
8. International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic test systems - requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. ISO International Standard 15197:2003.
9. Louie RF, Tang Z, Sutton, DV, Lee JH, Kost GJ. Point-of-care glucose testing: effects of critical care variables, influence of reference instruments, and a modular glucose meter design. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124(2):257-66. (Pubitemid 30090612)
10. Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau Notification No. 0302007. Regulations on approval criteria for self-monitoring glucose meters. Yakushokuhatso. 2007.
11. Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, Ginsberg BH. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(8):1143-8. (Pubitemid 30616803)