Differences in mechanical properties between human and porcine aortic root

Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 36th Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, NEBEC 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Martin, Caitlin ^a   Pham, Thuy ^a   Sun, Wei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL STUDIES; ANIMAL TISSUE; AORTIC ROOT; AORTIC STENOSIS; AORTIC TISSUE; AORTIC VALVES; CLINICAL TRIAL; ENDOVASCULAR; HOST TISSUES; MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATIONS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; TISSUE INTERACTIONS;

ANIMALS; BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HISTOLOGY; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; TISSUE;

BIOMECHANICS;

EID: 77953058674     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/NEBC.2010.5458220     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. M. Ferrari et al., Heart 90, 1326 (2004).
2. J. Liddicoat, R. et al., Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 60, 410 (2003).
3. J. G. Webb et al., Circulation 116, 755 (2007).
4. E. Grube et al., Circulation 114, 1616 (2006).
5. B. Iung, A. Vahanian, The Lancet 368, 969 (2006/9/22/, 2006).
6. M. S. Sacks, W. Sun, Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 5, 251 (2003).
7. N. Gundiah et al., The Journal of heart valve disease 17, 606 (2008).
8. R. B. Hickler, Clin. Cardiol. 13, 317 (1990).
9. V. Khetarpal et al., Journal of the Neurological Sciences 287, 32 (2009).