Review of the molecular biological basic principles of the V.A.C.® therapy;Übersicht über die molekularbiologischen Grundlagen der V.A.C.® Therapy

Zeitschrift fur Wundheilung

Volumn 15, Issue A, 2010, Pages 6-10

  Leffler, M ^a   Derrick, K L ^b   McNulty, A ^b   Malsiner, C ^a   Horch, R E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b Kinetic Concepts Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronic wounds; Gene expression; Vacuum therapie; Woundhealing

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953050240     PISSN: 1439670X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Joseph E, Hamori CA, Bergman S, Roaf E, Swann NF, Anastasi GW (2000) A prospective, randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure versus standard therapy of chronic nonhealing wounds. Wounds. 12: 60-67
2. Venturi ML, Attinger CE, Mesbahi AN, Hess CL, Graw KS (2005) Mechanisms and Clinical Applications of the Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Device: A Review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 6: 185-194 (Pubitemid 40994261)
3. Short B, Claxton M, Armstrong DG (2002) How to use VAC therapy on chronic wounds. Podiatry Today. 15: 48-54.
4. Sibbald RG, Mahoney J (2003) A consensus report on the use of vacuum-assisted closure in chronic, difficult-to-healwounds. Ostomy Wound Manage. 49: 52-66.
5. Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ (1997) Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg. 38: 563-576
6. KCI Licensing (2006) V.A.C.® Therapy Clinical Guidelines KCI Licensing.
7. th Edition Edn. Malvern-. HMP Communications.
8. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Diabetic Foot Study Consortium (2005) Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 366:1704-1710
9. Braakenburg A, Obdeijn MC, Feitz R, van Rooij IA, van Griethuysen AJ, Klinkenbijl JH (2006) The Clinical Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of the Vacuum-Assisted Closure Technique in the Management of Acute and Chronic Wounds: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 118: 390-400. (Pubitemid 44162045)
10. Etoz A, Ozgenel Y, Ozcan M (2004) The Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Preliminary Controlled Trial. Wounds. 16:264-269 (Pubitemid 39207820)
11. Eginton MT, Brown KR, Seabrook GR, Towne JB, Cambria RA (2003) A prospective randomized evaluation of negativepressure wound dressings for diabetic foot wounds. Ann Vase Surg. 17: 645-649
12. McCallon SK, Knight CA, Valiulus JP, Cunningham MW, McCulloch JM, Farinas LP (2000) Vacuum-assisted closure versus saline-moistened gauze in the healing of postoperative diabetic foot wounds. Ostomy Wound Manage. 46: 28-34.
13. Moues CM, Vos MC, Van Den Bernd GJ, Stijnen T, Hovius SE (2004) Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial. Wound Repair Regen. 12:11-17 (Pubitemid 38249130)
14. Ford CN, Reinhard ER, Yeh D, et al. (2002) Interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure versus the healthpoint system in the management of pressure ulcers. Ann Plast Surg. 49: 55-61. (Pubitemid 34755468)
15. Vuerstaek JD, Vainas T, Wuite J, Nelemans P, Neumann MH, Veraart JC (2006) State-of-the-art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: A randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.®) with modern wound dressings. J Vasc Surg. 44: 1029-1038 (Pubitemid 46107242)
16. Saxena V, Hwang CW, Huang S, Eichbaum Q, Ingber D, Orgill DP (2004) Vacuum-assisted closure: microdeformations of wounds and cell proliferation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 114:1086-1096 (Pubitemid 40362027)
17. McNulty AK, Schmidt M, Feeley T, Kieswetter K (2007) Effects of negative pressure wound therapy on fibroblast viability, chemotactic signaling, and proliferation in a provisional wound (fibrin) matrix. Wound Repair Regen. 15: 838-846 (Pubitemid 350135231)
18. McNulty AK, Schmidt M, Feeley T, Villaneuva P, Kieswetter K (2009) Effects of negative pressure wound therapy on cellular energetics in fibroblasts grown in a provisional wound (fibrin) matrix. Wound Repair Regen. 17: 192-199