International subarachnoid trial in the long run: Critical evaluation of the long-term follow-up data from the ISAT trial of clipping vs coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms

Neurosurgery

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1166-1169

  Raper, Daniel M S ^a   Allan, Rodney ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cerebral aneurysm; Clipping; Coiling; Endovascular therapy; Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Indexed keywords

ANEURYSM SURGERY; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM RUPTURE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLIP; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NEUROSURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RECURRENT DISEASE; REOPERATION; SHORT SURVEY; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; SURGEON; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; SURVIVOR; TREATMENT INDICATION;

AUSTRALIA; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; TIME; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 77953027793     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000369613.44834.12     Document Type: Short Survey

References (40)

1. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Birks J, et al. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardized mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) : long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(5):427-433.
2. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005;366(9488):809-817.
3. yrotocol 99PRT18 International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). http://www.thelancet.com/protocol-reviews/99PRT-18. Accessed May 3, 2009.
4. Ausman JI. ISAT study: is coiling better than clipping? Surg Neurol. 2003;59(3):162-175.
5. Laitt RD. How much can be concluded from ISAT? Br J Neurosurg. 2007;21(1):9-10.
6. Mitha A P, Ogilvy CS. ISAT: coiling or clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4(12):791-792.
7. McNeil DG Jr. Fixing aneurysms without surgery. New York Times November 12, 2002. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/12/health/fixing-aneurysms- withoutsurgery.html. Accessed May 29, 2009.
8. Molyneux A, Kerr R. More on ISAT. Author's reply. Lancet. 2003;362:783-784.
9. Ogilvy CS. Neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2003;34(10):2540-2542.
10. Sade B, Mohr G. Critical appraisal of the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT). Neurol India. 2004;52(1):32-35.
11. Sellar R, Whittle I. The ISAT Trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9355):432-433.
12. Sellar R, Whittle I. The lessons learnt from ISAT: surgical research is rescued from comic opera. Br J Neurosurg. 2004;18(4):405-406.
13. Derdeyn C P, Barr JD, Berenstein A, et al. The international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) : a position statement from the executive committee of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(7):1404-1408.
14. Heros RC, Hadley MN, Harbaugh RE. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial. Position statement by the AANS, CNS and AANS/CNS Section on Cerebrovascular Surgery. AANS Bulletin. 2002:20-21. http://www.aans.org/ bulletin/pdfs/winter02.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2009.
15. Kobayashi S. ISAT study: is coiling better than clipping? Commentary. Surg Neurol 2003;59:167-168.
16. Britz G W. ISAT trial: coiling or clipping for intracranial aneurysms? Lancet. 2005;366(9488):783-785.
17. Raja PV, Huang J, Germanwala AV, Gailloud P, Murphy K P, Tamargo RJ. Microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a critical review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(6):1187-1203.
18. Javadpour M. ISAT: will the results stand the test of time? Br J Neurosurg. 2007;21(1):7-8.
19. Ait MJ, Critchley GR, Norris JS. How much can be concluded from the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) ? Br J Neurosurg. 2007;21(1):3-6.
20. Debrun G. ISAT study: is coiling better than clipping? Commentary. Surg Neurol. 2003;59:168.
21. Batjer HH. ISAT study: is coiling better than clipping? Commentary. Surg Neurol. 2003;59:168-169 (comment).
22. Kerr RS, Molyneaux A. ISAT study: is coiling better than clipping? Response to Comments. Surg Neurol. 2003;59:173-175.
23. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9342):1267-1274.
24. Nichols DA, Brown RD Jr, Meyer FB. Coils or clips in subarachnoid haemorrhage? Lancet. 2002;360(9342):1262-1263.
25. Solomon RA. ISAT study: is coiling better than clipping? Commentary. Surg Neurol. 2003;59:173.
26. Harbaugh RE. ISAT study: is coiling better than clipping? Commentary. Surg Neurol. 2003;59:165-167.
27. Andaluz N, Zuccarello M. Recent trends in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: analysis of a nationwide inpatient database. J Neurosurg. 2008;108(6):1163-1169.
28. Choudhari KA. ISUIA, ISAT and the National Study of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: changing trends and implications for neurovascular services in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Br J Neurosurg. 2006;20(6):375-378.
29. Crocker M, Corns R, Hampton T, Deasy N, Tolias CM. Vascular neurosurgery following the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial: modern practice reflected by subspecialization. J Neurosurg. 2008;109(6):992-997.
30. Wermer MJ, Greebe P, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Incidence of recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage after clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2005;36(11):2394-2399.
31. Tait MJ, Critchley GR, Norris JS. Findings of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial and the National Study of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage in context. Br J Neurosurg. 2007;21:323-325. Commentary.
32. Schaafsma JD, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, et al. Long-term recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage after adequate coiling versus clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2009;40(5):1758-1763.
33. Mitchell P, Kerr R, Mendelow AD, Molyneux A. Could late rebleeding overturn the superiority of cranial aneurysm coil embolization over clip ligation seen in the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial? J Neurosurg. 2008;108(3):437-442.
34. Andaluz N, Zuccarello M. Anterior communicating artery aneurysm surgery through the orbitopterional approach: long-term follow-up in a series of 75 consecutive patients. Skull Base. 2008;18(4):265-274.
35. Dashti R, Laakso A, Niemelä M, Porras M, Hernesniemi J. Microscope-integrated near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography during surgery of intracranial aneurysms: the Helsinki experience. Surg Neurol. 2009;71(5):543-550.
36. Friedman JA, Kumar R. Intraoperative angiography should be standard in cerebral aneurysm surgery. BMC Surg. 2009;9:7.
37. Gross BA, Bendok BR, Hage ZA, Awad IA, Batjer HH. Advances in open neurovascular surgery 2007. Stroke. 2009;40(1):324-326.
38. Tang G, Cawley CM, Dion JE, Barrow DL. Introperative angiography during aneurysm surgery: a prospective evaluation of efficacy. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(6):993-999.
39. Wakhloo AK, Deleo MJ III, Brown MM. Advances in interventional neuroradiology. Stroke. 2009; 40 (5) : e305-e312.
40. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine-Levels of Evidence (March 2009). http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025. Accessed 30 May, 2009.