Free form property rights for fisheries: The decentralized design of rights-based management through groundfish "sectors" in New England

Marine Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1076-1081

  Holland, Daniel S ^a   Wiersma, Joshua ^b  

^a GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Fisheries; Harvest cooperatives; Individual quotas

Indexed keywords

COOPERATIVE SECTOR; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; HARVESTING; PROPERTY RIGHTS; QUOTA SYSTEM;

NEW ENGLAND; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77953026726     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Criddle K., Macinko S. A requiem for the IFQ in US fisheries?. Marine Policy 2000, 24:461-469.
2. Kitts A., Pinto da Silva P., Rountree B. The evolution of collaborative management in the Northeast USA tilefish fishery. Marine Policy 2007, 31:192-200.
3. Kitts A., Edwards S. Cooperatives in US fisheries: realizing the potential of the Fishermen's Collective Marketing Act. Marine Policy 2003, 27:357-366.
4. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAAa). Approval of the Georges Bank Cod Hook Sector Operations Plan, March 3, 2005.
5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAAb). Approval of the Georges Bank Cod Fixed Gear Sector and Operations Plan, April 27, 2005.
6. Pinto da Silva P., Kitts A. Collaborative fisheries management in the northeast US: emerging initiatives and future directions. Marine Policy 2006, 30:832-841.
7. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric, Administration (NOAA). Proposed rule: Magnuson-Stevens Act provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast Multispecies Fishery; 2010 Sector Operations Plans and Contracts, and Allocation of Northeast Multispecies Annual Catch Entitlements. Federal Register/vol. 74(244)/Tuesday, December 22, 2009.
8. Scott A. Introducing property in fishery management. Use of property rights in fisheries management, FAO fisheries technical paper, no. 404/1 2000, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. R. Shotton (Ed.).
9. McElderry H, Turris B. Evaluation of monitoring and reporting needs for ground fish sectors in New England. Final report. Available from: , 2008. http://www.GMRI.org/community/outreach.
10. Yandle T. The promise and perils of building a co-management regime: an institutional assessment of New Zealand fisheries management 1999-2005. Marine Policy 2008, 32:132-141.
11. Yandle T. The challenge of building successful stakeholder organizations: New Zealand's experience in developing a fisheries co-management regime. Marine Policy 2003, 27:179-192.
12. Fisheries Act 1996, New Zealand. Part 16, Section 305.(b).
13. Yandle T. Rock lobster management in New Zealand: the development of devolved governance. In: Townsend R, Shotton R, Uchida H, editors. Case studies in fisheries self-governance. FAO fisheries technical paper, no. 504. Rome: FAO; 2008. 451 pp.
14. Mincher R. New Zealand's Challenger Scallop Enhancement Company: from reseeding to self-governance. In: Townsend R, Shotton R, Uchida H, editors. Case studies in fisheries self-governance. FAO fisheries technical paper, no. 504. Rome: FAO; 2008. 451 pp.
15. Clement G, Wells R, Gallagher CM. Industry management within the New Zealand quota management system: the Orange Roughy Management Company. In: Townsend R, Shotton R, Uchida H, editors. Case studies in fisheries self-governance. FAO fisheries technical paper, no. 504. Rome: FAO; 2008. 451 pp.