Comparative Structural Models of Similarities and Differences between vehicle and target in order to teach Darwinian Evolution

Science and Education

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 599-623

  Marcelos, Maria Fátima ^a   Nagem, Ronaldo L ^a  

^a CENTRO FEDERAL DE EDUCAÇÃO TECNOLÓGICA DE MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953023921     PISSN: 09267220     EISSN: 15731901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-009-9218-2     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Al-Zahrani, A. (2008). Darwin's metaphors revisited: Conceptual metaphors, conceptual blends, and idealized cognitive models in the theory of evolution. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 50-82. ISSN 1092-6488 Cited 1° time 4 Feb 2008. http://direct. bl. uk/bld/PlaceOrder. do?UIN=226665326& ETOC =RN& from=searchengine Cited 2° time 24 Dec 2008.
2. Asoko, H. Y. & Deboo, M. (2001). Analogies and illustrations: Representing ideas in primary science. The Association for Science Education, Hatfield, UK. ISBN: 9780863573316. www. abebooks. co. uk/products/isbn/9780863573316/Asoko-Hilary-De-Boo-Max/Analogies-and-Illustrations-Representing-Idea s-in-Primary-Science/Cited 25 Sept 2008.
3. Augier, A. (1801). Trial of a new classification of plants (Essai d'une nouvelle classification des végétaux) Lyon, An IX.
4. Boyd, R. (1979). Metaphor and theory change: What is metaphor is a metaphor for? In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 356-408). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-40561-0.
5. Brown, D., & Clement, J. (1989). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction, Instructional Science, 18, 237-261. doi: 10. 1007/BF00118013. http://www. springerlink. com/content/h23xw0r303l1862k/Cited 13 Jul 2008.
6. Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 161-199. In J. Scotchmoor & A. Thanukos (2007). Building an understanding of evolution: An online resource for teaching and learning. Mcgill Journal of Education, 42(2), 225-244 ISSN-0024-9033.
7. Contenças, P., & Levy, T. (1999). The role of metaphor in the language of science (A Função da Metáfora na Linguagem da Ciência), Revista de Educação, Departamento de Educação da F. C. da U. L., Portugal, VII, 2, pp. 77-82. ISSN 0871-3928.
8. Curtis, R. V., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1984). The use of analogies in written text. Instructional Science, 13, 99-117. ISSN 0020-4277. doi: 10. 1007/BF00052380.
9. Dagher, Z. R. (1995). Review of studies on the effectiveness of instructional analogies, Science Education, 79(3), 295-312. doi: 10. 1002/sce. 3730790305.
10. Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life (1st ed.). London: John Murray, 1st issue. http://darwin-online. org. uk/content/frameset?itemID=F373& viewtype=side& pageseq=1. Cited in: 11 June 2008.
11. Dreistadt, R. (1968). An analysis of the use of analogies and metaphors in science. Journal of Psychology, 68, 97-116.
12. Duarte, M. C. (2005). Analogies in science education: Contributions and challenges (Analogias na Educação em Ciências: Contributos e Desafios): Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, Porto Alegre, Brasil, Instituto de Física da UFRS, V. 10, n. 1, Mar. ISSN 1518-8795 Disponível em: http://www. if. ufrgs. br/public/ensino/vol10/n1/26indice. html. Cited in: 7 Oct 05 (Available only in the original Portuguese).
13. Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672. doi: 10. 1002/sce. 3730750606.
14. Evans, L. T. (1984). Darwin's use of the analogy between artificial and natural selection. Journal of the History of Biology, 17(1), 113-140.
15. Eve, R., & Harrold, F. (1991). The creationist movement in modern America. Boston, MA: Twayne Publishers. In J. Scotchmoor & A. Thanukos (2007). Building an understanding of evolution: An online resource for teaching and learning. Mcgill Journal of Education, 42(2), 225-244. ISSN-0024-9033.
16. Ferraz, D. F., & Terrazzan, E. A. (2001). The use of analogies as a teaching resource for biology teachers in high school (O uso de analogias como recurso didático por professores de Biologia no ensino médio), Revista da ABRAPEC, Brasil, 1(3), 124-135. (Available only in the original Portuguese).
17. Ferry, A., & Nagem, R. (2008). Analogies & counter-analogies: A proposal for the teaching of science perspective Bachelard (Analogias & contra-analogias: Uma proposta para o ensino de ciências numa perspectiva bachelardiana), Experiências em Ensino de Ciências, Brasil, 3, pp. 7-21 (Available only in the original Portuguese).
18. Figueroa, A. M. S. (2004). The systematic use of analogies: A study of a teaching model to the concept of blood group incompatibility (O uso sistemático de analogias: Estudo de um modelo de ensino para o conceito de incompatibilidade sangüínea), Dissertation (Masters in Technology Education) Federal Center of Technological Education of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Available only in the original Portuguese.
19. Galagovsky, L. R. & Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2001). Models and analogies in the teaching of natural sciences. The concept of analogue teaching model (Modelos y Analogías en la Enseñanza de las Ciencias Naturales. El concepto de Modelo Didáctico Analógico), Enseñanza de las Ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas, Espanha, 19(2), 231-242. ISSN 0212-452 http://ddd. uab. es/pub/edlc/02124521v19n2p231. pdf cited 24 Dec 2008.
20. Glynn, S. (1991). Explaining science concepts: A teaching-with-analogies model. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 219-240). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
21. Gregory, T. R. (2009). Artificial selection and domestication: Modern lessons from Darwin's enduring analogy, Evolution Education and Outreach, 2(1), 5-27. On line in: http://springerlink. com/content/63pu41w64v 800721/doi: 10. 1007/s12052-008-0114-z.
22. Guimarães, R. C. (2006). Self-organization and selection in the origin of life and evolution (Auto-Organização e Seleção na Origem da Vida e na Evolução'), Episteme, Brasil, 11(24), 293-334. Disponível em: http://www. ilea. ufrgs. br/episteme/portal/pdf/numero24/episteme24 guimaraes. pdf.
23. Haeckel, E. (1866). General morphology of organisms (Generelle Morphologie der Organismen) 2 vols. Reimer, Berlin. 567 p e 462 p.
24. Harrison, A., & Treagust, D. (1993). Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade-10 optics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1291-1307. doi: 10. 1002/tea. 3660301010.
25. Harrison, A., & Treagust, D. (2006). Teaching and learning with analogies. In A. Perter, H. Allan & R. Stephen (Eds.). Metaphor and analogy in science education. New York: Springer, pp. 11-24. ISBN 978-1-4020-3830-3. doi: 10. 1007/1-4020-3830-5_2.
26. Hey, J., Linsey, J., Agogino, A., & Wood, K. L. (2008). Analogies and metaphors in creative design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(2), 283-294. ISSN 0949-149X.
27. Hofmann, J. R., & Weber, B. H. (2003). The fact of evolution: Implications for science education. Science & Education, 12, Number 8/November, 729-760. doi: 10. 1023/B: SCED. 0000004556. 80802. 3a. http://www. springerlink. com/content/r6w5hl6lm3450x46/fu lltext. pdf Cited 24 Dec 2008.
28. Indurkhya, B. (1992). Metaphor and cognition. An interactionist approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer, ISBN 0-7923-1687-8.
29. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, ISBN 9780226468013.
30. Marcelos, M. F. (2006). Analogies and metaphors of "Tree of Life", by Charles Darwin in teaching practice (Analogias e Metáforas da "Árvore da Vida", de Charles Darwin, na Prática Escolar). Dissertation, Masters in Technology Education, Federal Center of Technological Education of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Available only in the original Portuguese.
31. Meyer, D., & El-Hani, C. N. (2005). Evolution: Making sense of biology (Evolução: o Sentido da Biologia). UNESP, São Paulo, Brasil. ISBN: 8571396027.
32. Nagem, R. L. (1997). Expression and receipt of human thought and its relation to the teaching and learning in science and technology: Images, metaphors and analogies. (Expressão e recepção do pensamento humano e sua relação como processo de ensino e de aprendizagem no campo da ciência e da tecnologia: imagens, metáforas e analogias). Seminar presented in public tender for a teacher of the Federal Center of Technological Education of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil, 55f. Available only in the original Portuguese.
33. Nagem, R. L., Carvalhes, D. O., & Dias, J. A. Y. (2001). A proposed methodology for teaching with analogies (Uma Proposta de Metodologia de Ensino com Analogias), Revista Portuguesa de Educação. Portugal, 14(1), 197-213. ISSN 0871-9187 Disponível em: http://redalyc. uaemex. mx/redalyc/pdf/374/37414109. pdf Cited in 24 Dec 2008). Available only in the original Portuguese.
34. Nagem, R. L., Figueroa, A. M. S., & Carvalho, E. M. (2005a). Analogies to the concept of the mismatch blood from a model of teaching (Analogias Para o Conceito de Incompatibilidade Sangüínea a Partir de um Modelo de Ensino) In V ENPEC-National Meeting of Research in Science Education, 2005, Bauru-SP, Brazil. Book of Abstracts-V ENPEC. Bauru-São Paulo: Edwaldo L da Silva & Sergio Camargo-Graphic Sena, 1, pp. 129-129. Available only in the original Portuguese.
35. Nagem, R., Figueroa, A. M. S., & Carvalho, E. M. (2005b). Methodology of teaching with analogies: A study on the classification of animals (Metodologia de Ensino com Analogias: um estudo sobre a classificação dos animais), Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion (Online), Spain, 34(5), 1-9. Available only in the original Portuguese.
36. Nagem, R. L., & Padua, I. C. A. (2007). The construction of knowledge through the application of analogies: A proposal for the teaching work in the teaching of sciences (A Construcao do Conhecimento Por Meio da Aplicação de Analogias: Uma Proposta Para o Trabalho Docente no Ensino de Ciências). In XII National Meeting of Science Education, 2007, Vila Real-Portugal. Contributions to Educational Quality in the Teaching of Sciences: Pre-primary to tertiary. Proceedings of the XII National Meeting of Science Education. Vila Real-Portugal: University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 1, pp. 637-642. Available only in the original Portuguese.
37. Newton, D. (2000). Supporting understanding with analogies. Teaching for understanding: What it is and how to do it. London: Routledge Falmer, pp. 71-85. ISBN10: 0-203-46587-3 ISBN13: 978-0-203-46587-5.
38. Regner, A. C. K. P. (1997). The role of metaphor in long argument of the origin of species (O Papel da Metáfora no Longo Argumento da Origem das Espécies). Paper presented at the VI National Seminar on the History of Science and Technology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Proceedings. Rio de Janeiro, pp. 35-39. Available at: www. triplov. com/mesa_redonda/anna_ carolina/darwin_metaphor. html. Cited in: 25 Jan 2005. Available only in the original Portuguese.
39. Rutledge, M. L., & Mitchell, M. A. (2002). High school biology teachers knowledge: Structure, acceptance & teaching of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 64, 21-28. In J. Scotchmoor & A. Thanukos (2007). Building an understanding of evolution: An online resource for teaching and learning. Mcgill Journal of Education, 42(2), 225-244, ISSN-0024-9033.
40. Scotchmoor, J., & Thanukos, A. (2007). Building an understanding of evolution: An online resource for teaching and learning. Mcgill Journal of Education, 42(2), 225-244. ISSN-0024-9033.
41. Scott, E. C. (1999). Problem concepts in evolution: Cause, purpose, design, and chance. In P. H. Kelley, J. R. Bryan & T. A. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution-creation controversy II: Perspectives on science, religion, and geological education. Paleontological Society Papers, 5. In J. Scotchmoor & A. Thanukos (2007). Building an understanding of evolution: An online resource for teaching and learning. Mcgill Journal of Education, 42(2), 225-244. ISSN-0024-9033.
42. Spiro, R., Feltovich, P., Coulson, R., & Anderson, D. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 498-531. ISBN: 0-521-38935-6.
43. Spivak, E. (2006). The tree of life: A representation of the evolution and development of representation (El árbol de la vida: uma representación de la evolución y la evolución de una representación), Ciencia Hoy en línea, Buenos Aires, 16, 91, Enero-Febrero. ISSN 1666-5171 http://www. cienciahoy. org. ar/ln/hoy91/arbol. htm. Cited 3 Aug 2006.
44. Sutton, C. (1996). Beliefs about science and beliefs about language. International Journal of Science Education, 18(1), 1-18. doi: 10. 1080/0950069960180101.
45. Thagard, P., & Holyoak, K. J. (1994). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. ISBN-10: 0262581442.
46. Thiele, R. B., & Treagust, D. F. (1994). The nature and extent of analogies in secondary chemistry textbooks. Instructional Science, 22, 61-74. doi: 10. 1007/BF00889523.
47. Thiele, R. B., & Treagust, D. F. (1995). Analogies in chemistry textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 17(6), 783-785. doi: 10. 1080/0950069950170609.
48. Treagust, D., Duit, R., Joslin, P., & Lindauer, I. (1992). Science teachers' use of analogies: Observations from classroom practice. International Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 413-422. doi: 10. 1080/0950069920140404.
49. Treagust, D., Harrison, A., & Venville, G. (1996). Using an analogical teaching approach to engender conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 213-229. doi: 10. 1080/0950069960180206.
50. Viau, J. E., Moro, L. E., Zamorano, R. O., & Gibbs, H. M. (2008). The epistemological transfer of an analogical didactic model (La Transferencia Epistemológica de un Modelo Didáctico Analógico). In Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 5(2), 170-184 ISSN: 1697-011X http://www. apac-eureka. org/revista/Volumen5/Numero_5_2/Viau_et_al_2008. pdf. Acesso em 30 Out. 2008.
51. Wallace, A. R. (1855). On the law which has regulated the introduction of new species [dated Feb. 1855, Sarawak, Borneo]. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 16 (2nd s.): 184-196 (Sept. 1855: no. 93, 2nd s.). reprints: in CTNS: 1-25 (April 1870); in NSTN: 3-19 (May 1891). The Alfred Russel Wallace Page. http://www. wku. edu/~smithch/wallace/S020. htm. Cited in: 22 Oct 2008.
52. Wong, E. (1993a). Self-generated analogies as a tool for constructing and evaluating explanations of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), 367-380. doi: 10. 1002/tea. 3660300405.
53. Wong, E. (1993b). Understanding the generative capacity of analogies as a tool for explanation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1259-1272. doi: 10. 1002/tea. 3660301008.