Ocean governance in a competitive world. The BRIC countries as emerging maritime powers-building new geopolitical scenarios

Marine Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 967-978

  Suárez de Vivero, Juan L ^a   Rodríguez Mateos, Juan C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

BRIC; EU Integrated Maritime Policy; Maritime scenarios; Ocean governance; Sea power

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; MARINE POLICY; SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TERRITORIAL MANAGEMENT;

BRAZIL; CHINA; INDIA; RUSSIAN FEDERATION;

EID: 77953021656     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Suárez de Vivero J.L., Rodríguez Mateos J.C. Spain and the sea. The decline of an ideology, crisis in the maritime sector and the challenges of globalization. Marine Policy 2002, 26:143-153.
2. IMF. World economic outlook. Sustaining the recovery. Washington, DC: IMF, Multimedia Services Division; October 2009.
3. Global trends 2025: A Transformed World. National Intelligence Council; 2008.
4. Lawson S, et al. Why the BRICs dream won't be green. BRICs monthly (06/06); 2006. Goldman Sachs global economic website. Available on the internet at http://www2.goldmansachs.com/ideas/environment-and-energy/goldman-sachs/brics-green.pdf.
5. Mackinder H.J. The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal 1904, 23:421-437.
6. Mapping the global future. Report of the National Intelligence Council's 2020 project; 2004.
7. Global scenarios to 2025. National Intelligence Council.
8. Oceans and law of the sea. Division for oceans affairs and the law of the sea. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/index.htm.
9. Submissions, through the Secretary-General of the United Nations, to the Commission on the limits of the continental shelf, pursuant to article 76, paragraph 8, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/commission_submissions.htm.
10. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/submission_rus.htm.
11. Continental shelf and UNCLOS article 76. Brazilian Submission. Brazilian Continental Shelf Survey Project 2004. Executive Summary.
12. The Indian Continental Shelf. Partial Submission to the Commission on the limits of the continental shelf, pursuant to article 76, paragraph 8 of the United Nations convention on the Law of the Sea. Part I Executive Summary. 2009-11-04.
13. Preliminary information indicative of the outer limits of the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles of the People's Republic of China (Translation); 2009.
14. Yenikeyeff SM, Krysiek TF. The battle for the next energy frontier: the Russian polar expedition and the future of Arctic hydrocarbons. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies: Oxford Energy Comment; August 2007.
15. Valencia M.J. The East China Sea dispute: context, claims, issues, and possible solutions. Asian Perspective 2007, 31(1):127-167.
16. Lai D. China's maritime quest. Op-Ed. Strategic Studies Institute; June 2009.
17. Ministry of Defence (UK). The future maritime operational concept 2007. The development, concepts and doctrine centre.
18. Rogers J. From Suez to Shanghai: The European Union and Eurasian maritime security. European Union Institute for security studies: Occasional Paper 77; March 2009.
19. Prakash A. A vision of India's maritime power in the 21st century. Air Power Journal 2006, 3(1):1-12.
20. Raja Mohan C. Maritime power: India and China turn to Mahan. ISAS Working Paper. 71; 2009.
21. Taylor PD. Why does Brazil need nuclear submarines? In: USNI Proc. Magazine ; 2009, 135/6/1.276. Available on the internet at http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/story.asp?STORY_ID=1908.
22. Merriam Webster's geographical dictionary, 3rd ed. Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster Publishers; 2001.
23. Birchenko Y. Russian offshore: is the shelf too high to reach? offshore Russia. Scandinavian Oil-Gas Magazine 2007, 5(6).
24. International northern sea route programme. http://www.fni.no/insrop/.
25. UN population division. http://www.un.org/esa/population/unpop.htm.
26. Rodrigue J.-P. Straits, passages and choquepoints. A maritime geoestrategy of petroleum distribution. Cahiers de Géographie du Québec 2004, 48(135):357-374.
27. Kapila S. China-India strategic alliance-should not be unthinkable: an analysis. South Asia Analysis Group. Paper no. 1.375, 12.05.2005. Available on the internet at http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/%5Cpapers14%5Cpaper1375.html.
28. Pehrson CJ. String of pearls. Meeting the challenge of China's rising power across the Asian littoral. The Strategic Studies Institute; July 2007. Available on the internet at http://www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil/.
29. Pandya A. No man's sea: international rules and pragmatic cooperation. The Indian Ocean. Resource and governance challenges 2009, The Henry L. Stimson Center, Washington. E. Laipson, A. Pandya (Eds.).
30. Petrobras. http://www.petrobras.com.br/pt/.
31. OECD. The role of changing transport costs and technology in industrial relocation. DSTI/DOT/MTC(2005)5/REV1; 09.05.2005. p. 7.
32. Cargo systems-key intelligence for the port and cargo industries. Top 100 container ports. Available on the internet at http://www.cargosystems.net/freightpubs/cs/top100interactiveGuide.htm.
33. UNCTAD. Review of maritime transport 2008: New York and Geneva, United Nations. UNCTAD/RMT/2008.
34. UNCTAD. Handbook of statistics 2008: New York and Geneva, United Nations, TD/STAT. 33, United Nations Publication.
35. Suárez de Vivero J.L. The European vision for oceans and seas-Social and political dimensions of the green paper on Maritime Policy for the EU. Marine Policy 2007, 31:409-414.
36. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Canada's Oceans strategy. Ottawa: Fisheries and Oceans Canada: Oceans Directorate; 2002. p. 10-20.
37. Australia's Oceans Policy 1998, Commonwealth of Australia, Environment Australia, Canberra.
38. Wescott G. The development and initial implementation of Australia's 'integrated and comprehensive Oceans policy. Ocean and Coastal Management 2000, 43(10-11):853-878.
39. Maritime Doctrine of Russian Federation 2020. Approved President Russian Federation Vladimir Putin, 27 July 2001. No. Pr-1387.
40. Kolochkov Y, et al. The Marine Policy of the Russian Federation: its formation and realization. Nippon Foundation Research Task Force on National Ocean Policies; 2005.
41. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. National Ocean Policy. The basic texts from: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Japan, Norway, Portugal, Russian Federation, United States of America. Paris: UNESCO, IOC Technical Series, 75. Law of the Sea Dossier 1; 2007.
42. Gupta HK. National Ocean Policy-India. Nippon Foundation Research Task Force on National Ocean Policies; 2005.
43. Li H. The impacts and implications of the legal framework for sea use planning and management in China. Ocean and Coastal Management 2006, 49:717-726.
44. Lau M. Integrated coastal zone management in the People's Republic of China-an assessment of structural impacts on decision-making processes. Ocean and Coastal Management 2005, 48:115-159.
45. The Development of China's Marine Programs 1998, Information Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China, Information Office of the State Council, Beijing, (Available on the internet at 〈http://www.lib.noaa.gov/china/programs.htm〉).
46. Keyuan Z. China's governance over offshore oil and gas. Development and management. Ocean Development and International Law 2004, 35:339-364.
47. PNRM-olítica Nacional para os Recursos do Mar: diretrizes gerais 1980, Comissão Interministerial para os Recursos do Mar, CIRM, Brasilia.
48. Decreto no. 5.377, de 23 de fevereiro de 2005, que aprova a Política Nacional para os Recursos do Mar-PNRM. Available on the internet at http://www.dji.com.br/decretos/2005-005377/2005-005377.htm.
49. Asmus ML, Villela Marroni E, Vieira GG. Ocean Policy in Brazil. Nippon Foundation Research Task Force on National Ocean Policies; 2005.
50. Ministerio da Defesa (Brasil). Estrategia Nacional de Defesa; 2008. Available on the internet at http://www.defesa.gov.br.
51. Suárez de Vivero J.L. The European vision for oceans and seas-social and political dimensions of the Green Paper on Maritime Policy for the EU. Marine Policy 2007, 31:409-414.
52. Commission of the European Communities. The European Union and the Arctic Region. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Brussels, 20.11.2008, COM(2008) 763 final.
53. Revkin AC, Broder JM. A grudging accord in climate talks. The New York Times, 19.12.09. Available on the internet at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/science/earth/20accord.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1.
54. Kempf H. L'Europe a démissioné à la conférence de Copenhague. Le Monde, 23.12.09. Available on the internet at http://www.lemonde.fr/opinions/article/2009/12/23/l-europe-a-demissionne-a-la-conference-de-copenhague-par-herve-kempf_1284252_3232.html.
55. The Observer, 20.12.09. Copenhagen: the key players and how they rated. Available on the internet at http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/20/copenhagen-obama-brown-climate.