Retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings: A decision analysis to compare outcomes including efficacy and complications

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 787-793

  Shepherd, Jonathan P ^a,c   Lowder, Jerry L ^a   Jones, Keisha A ^a   Smith, Kenneth J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Decision analysis; Midurethral sling; Retropubic midurethral sling; Stress urinary incontinence; Transobturator midurethral sling

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE; TRANSOBTURATOR TAPE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS; SUBURETHRAL SLING; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SUBURETHRAL SLINGS; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 77953015258     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1121-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. JL Melville W Katon K Delaney K Newton 2005 Urinary incontinence in U.S. women: a population-based study Arch Intern Med 165 537 542 10.1001/archinte. 165.5.537 15767530 (Pubitemid 40344385)
2. D Thom 1998 Variation in estimates of urinary incontinence prevalence in the community: effects of difference in definition, population characteristics, and study type J Am Geriatr Soc 46 473 480 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3hvV2qug%3D%3D 9560071
3. AL Olson VJ Smith JO Bergstrom JC Colling AL Clark 1997 Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence Obstet Gynecol 89 501 506 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6 (Pubitemid 27133519)
4. DH Thom IE Nygaard EA Calhoun 2005 Urologic Diseases in American Project: urinary incontinence in women-national trends in hospitalizations, office visits, treatment, and economic impact J Urol 173 1295 1301 10.1097/01.ju. 0000155679.77895.cb 15758785 (Pubitemid 40380557)
5. U Ulmsten L Henriksson P Johnson G Varhos 1996 An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence Int Urogynecol J 7 81 85 10.1007/BF01902378 1:STN:280:DyaK28zptFWiuw%3D%3D
6. H Enzelsberger J Schaluphy R Heider G Mayer 2005 TVT versus TOT-A prospective randomized study for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence at a follow-up of 1 year Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 65 506 511 10.1055/s-2005-837654 (Pubitemid 40812855)
7. Y-W Kim Y-G Na C-K Sul 2005 Randomized prospective study between pubovaginal sling using SPARC sling system and MONARC sling system for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: short term results Korean J Urol 46 1078 1082
8. E David-Montefiore JL Frobert M Grisard-Anaf J Leinhart K Bonnet C Poncelet, et al. 2006 Peri-operative complications and pain after the suburethral sling procedure for urinary stress incontinence: a French prospective randomized multicentre study comparing the retropubic and transobturator routes Eur Urol 49 133 138 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.019 16310932 (Pubitemid 41789969)
9. AC Wang YH Lin LH Tseng SY Chih CJ Lee 2006 Prospective randomized comparison of transobturator suburethral sling (Monarc) vs. suprapubic arc (Sparc) sling procedures for female urodynamic stress incontinence Int Urogynecol J 17 439 443 10.1007/s00192-005-0035-0 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtVaksr%2FM (Pubitemid 44143764)
10. AB Palanca FC Perez JFB Meseguer JAQ Zaragoza JE Claramunt FP Sepere 2005 Estudio comparativo de diferentes procedimientos de sling suburetral para el tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo Actas Urol Esp 29 757 763
11. E Delorme S Droupy R de Tayrac V Delmas 2004 Transobturator tape (Uratape): a new minimally invasive procedure to treat female urinary incontinence Eur Urol 45 203 207 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.12.001 14734007 (Pubitemid 38147827)
12. E Delorme 2001 La bandelette transobturatrice: un procédé mini-invasif pour traiter l'incontinence urinaire de la femme Prog Urol 11 1306 1313 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387isFWgsg%3D%3D 11859672
13. VW Sung MD Schleinitz CR Rardin RM Ward DL Myers 2007 Comparison of retropubic vs. transobturator approach to midurethral slings: a systematic review and meta-analysis AJOG 197 3 11 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.09.025 (Pubitemid 47001828)
14. AS Detsky G Naglie MD Krahn D Naimark DA Redelmeier 1997 Primer on medical decision analysis: Part 1-getting started Med Decis Making 17 123 125 10.1177/0272989X9701700201 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3mtFKkuw%3D%3D 9107606 (Pubitemid 27157026)
15. TO Tengs A Wallace 2000 One thousand health-related quality of life estimates Med Care 38 583 637 10.1097/00005650-200006000-00004 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czgtVaqtA%3D%3D 10843310
16. MR Gold P Franks KI McCoy DG Fryback 1998 Toward consistency in cost-utility analyses: using national measures to create condition-specific values Med Care 36 778 792 10.1097/00005650-199806000-00002 1:STN:280: DyaK1c3pt1SksA%3D%3D 9630120
17. MD Krahn G Naglie D Naimark DA Redelmeier AS Detsky 1997 Primer on medical decision analysis: part 4-analyzing the model and interpreting the results Med Decis Making 17 142 151 10.1177/0272989X9701700204 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3mtFKrsA%3D%3D 9107609 (Pubitemid 27157029)
18. SJ Walters JE Brazier 2005 Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-SD and SF-6D Qaul Life Res 14 1523 1532 10.1007/s11136-004-7713-0 (Pubitemid 40848233)
19. CD Wells WB Murrill MR Arguedas 2004 Comparison of health-related quality of life preferences between physicians and cirrhotic patients: implications for cost-utility analyses in chronic liver disease Dig Dis Sci 49 453 458 10.1023/B:DDAS.0000020502.46886.c1 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3ktFShtA%3D%3D 15139497 (Pubitemid 38453564)
20. MS Kramer AM MacLellan A Ciampi J Etezadi-Amoli DG Leduc 1990 Parents' vs physicians' utilities (values) for clinical outcomes in potentially bacteremic children J Clin Epidemiol 43 1319 1325 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90098-A 1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2FntlWmug%3D%3D 2254768