Simultaneous evaluation of renal morphology and function in live kidney donors using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1986-1991

  Artunc, F ^a   Yildiz, S ^a   Rossi, C ^a   Boss, A ^a   Dittmann, H ^a   Schlemmer, H P ^a   Risler, T ^a   Heyne, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Donor evaluation; GFR; Kidney transplantation; MR; Scintigraphy

Indexed keywords

GADOBUTROL; PENTETATE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY SCINTISCANNING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT SELECTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; CREATININE; FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LIVING DONORS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; TECHNETIUM TC 99M PENTETATE;

EID: 77953008787     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp772     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. EBPG Expert Group on Renal Transplantation. Section II: evaluation and selection of donors. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15: 39-51
2. British Transplantation Society/The Renal Association. United Kingdom. Guidelines for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation, 2nd edn. London, UK, 2005; http://www.bts.org.uk/standards.htm
3. Mandelbrot DA, Pavlakis M, Danovitch GM et al. The medical evaluation of living kidney donors: a survey of US transplant centers. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 2333-2343
4. Kawamoto S, Fishman EK. MDCT angiography of living laparoscop-ic renal donors. Abdom Imaging 2006; 31: 361-373
5. Grassi G, Abdelkawy H, Barsotti M et al. Living kidney transplantation: evaluation of renal function and morphology of potential donors. Transplant Proc 2009; 41: 1121-1124
6. Knoll G. Trends in kidney transplantation over the past decade. Drugs 2008; 68: 3-10
7. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Noz ME et al. Dynamic three-dimensional MR renography for the measurement of single kidney function: initial experience. Radiology 2003; 227: 289-294
8. Hackstein N, Kooijman H, Tomaselli S et al. Glomerular filtration rate measured using the Patlak plot technique and contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI with different amounts of gadolinium-DTPA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22: 406-414
9. Boss A, Schaefer JF, Martirosian P et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance nephrography and urography of uropathies in children. Rofo 2007; 179: 832-840
10. Staks T, Schuhmann-Giampieri G, Frenzel T et al. Pharmacokinetics, dose proportionality, and tolerability of gadobutrol after single intravenous injection in healthy volunteers. Invest Radiol 1994; 29: 709-715 (Pubitemid 24258267)
11. Prasad PV. Functional MRI of the kidney: tools for translational studies of pathophysiology of renal disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2006; 290: F958-F974
12. Choyke PL, Austin HA, Frank JA et al. Hydrated clearance of gad-olinium-DTPA as a measurement of glomerular filtration rate. Kidney Int 1992; 41: 1595-1598
13. Boss A, Martirosian P, Gehrmann M et al. Quantitative assessment of glomerular filtration rate with MR gadolinium slope clearance measurements. Radiology 2007; 242: 783-790
14. Boss A, Schaefer JF, Martirosian P et al. Contrast-enhanced dynamic MR nephrography using the TurboFLASH navigator-gating technique in children. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1509-1518
15. Boss A, Martirosian P, Schaefer JF et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance nephrography. Is saturation recovery TrueFISP advantageous over saturation recovery TurboFLASH? Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 256-262
16. Peters AM. The kinetic basis of glomerular filtration rate measurement and new concepts of indexation to body size. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004; 31: 137-149
17. Gunasekera RD, Allison DJ, Peters AM. Glomerular filtration rate in relation to extracellular fluid volume: similarity between 99mTc-DTPA and inulin. Eur J Nucl Med 1996; 23: 49-54
18. Rohrschneider WK, Haufe S, Wiesel M et al. Functional and morphologic evaluation of congenital urinary tract dilatation by using combined static-dynamic MR urography: findings in kidneys with a single collecting system. Radiology 2002; 224: 683-694
19. Morton KA, Pisani DE, Whiting JH Jr et al. Determination of glomerular filtration rate using technetium-99m-DTPA with differing degrees of renal function. J Nucl Med Technol 1997; 25: 110-114
20. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T et al. Expressing the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate with standardized serum creatinine values. Clin Chem 2007; 53: 766-772
21. Rossi C, Boss A, Artunc F et al. Comprehensive assessment of renal function and vessel morphology in potential living kidney donors: an MRI-based approach. Invest Radiol 2009; 44: 705-711
22. El-Diasty TA, El-Ghar ME, Shokeir AA et al. Magnetic resonance imaging as a sole method for the morphological and functional evaluation of live kidney donors. BJU Int 2005; 96: 111-116
23. Halpern EJ, Mitchell DG, Wechsler RJ et al. Preoperative evaluation of living renal donors: comparison of CT angiography and MR angi-ography. Radiology 2000; 216: 434-439
24. Kock MC, Ijzermans JN, Visser K et al. Contrast-enhanced MR an-giography and digital subtraction angiography in living renal donors: diagnostic agreement, impact on decision making, and costs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 448-456
25. Kramer U, Thiel C, Seeger A et al. Preoperative evaluation of potential living related kidney donors with high-spatial-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) angiography at 3 Tesla. Comparison with intraoperative findings. Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 747-755
26. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S et al. Evaluation of renal arteries in living renal donors: comparison between MDCT angiography and gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Radiat Med 2006; 24: 617-624
27. Hodgson DJ, Jan W, Rankin S et al. Magnetic resonance renal angi-ography and venography: an analysis of 111 consecutive scans before donor nephrectomy. BJU Int 2006; 97: 584-586
28. Anavekar N, Bais R, Carney S et al. Chronic kidney disease and automatic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate: a position statement. Clin Biochem Rev 2005; 26: 81-86