A comparison of two input methods for keypads on mobile devices

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 82, Issue , 2004, Pages 101-104

  Oniszczak, Aleks ^a   MacKenzie, I Scott ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Mobile devices; Phone keypad; Tactile feedback; Text entry

Indexed keywords

ERROR RATE; INPUT METHODS; KEYSTROKES PER CHARACTERS; NEW DEVICES; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TEXT ENTRY; TOUCHPAD;

COMPUTER KEYBOARDS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MOBILE DEVICES; PORTABLE EQUIPMENT; TELEPHONE SETS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 77952996884     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1028014.1028030     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. MacKenzie, I. S., & Oniszczak, A. A comparison of three selection techniques for Touchpads. Proc CHI '98, 336-343.
2. MacKenzie, I. S., & Zhang, S. X. The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard. Proc CHI '99, 25-31.
3. Pavlovych, A., & Stuerzlinger, W. Model for non-expert text entry speed on 12-button phone keypads. Proc CHI '04, 351-358
4. Poupyrev, I., Maruyama, S., & Rekimoto, J. TouchEngine: A tactile display for handheld devices. Proc CHI '02, 644-645.
5. Wigdor, D., & Balakrishnan, R. TiltText: Using tilt for text input to mobile phones, Proc UIST '03, 81-90.
6. MacKenzie, I. S. KSPC (keystrokes per character) as a characteristic of text entry techniques. Proc 4th Int Symp HCI with Mobile Devices. 195-210.