Fast numerical solutions of patient-specific blood flows in 3D arterial systems

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 73-85

  Mut, Fernando ^a   Aubry, Romain ^a   Löhner, Rainald ^a   Cebral, Juan R ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebral aneurysms; Cerebral arteries; Computational fluid dynamics; Deflated conjugate gradients; Hemodynamics

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL MODEL; ARTERIAL SYSTEMS; BLOOD FLOW; CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS; CEREBRAL ARTERIES; COMPUTATIONAL GRIDS; CONJUGATE GRADIENT; CONVERGENCE RATES; CYLINDRICAL MODELS; DEFLATED CONJUGATE GRADIENTS; EIGENVALUES; MEDICAL IMAGES; NUMBER OF ITERATIONS; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; POISSON SOLVERS; PRECONDITIONED CONJUGATE GRADIENT; TOTAL CPU TIME; TUBULAR STRUCTURES;

CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; HEMODYNAMICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; TUBULAR STEEL STRUCTURES;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 77952988932     PISSN: 20407939     EISSN: 20407947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1235     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Steinman DA, Taylor CA. Flow imaging and computing: large artery hemodynamics. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2005; 33(12):1704-1709.
2. Thomaset F. Implementation of Finite Element Methods for Navier-Stokes Equations. Springer: Berlin, 1981.
3. Gunsburger MD, Nicolaides R. Incompressible Computational Fluid Dynamics: Trends and Advances. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1993.
4. Hafez MM. Numerical Simulation of Incompressible Flows. World Scientific: Singapore, 2003.
5. Lohner R. Applied CFD Techniques: An Introduction Based on Finite Element Methods (2nd edn). Wiley: New York, 2008.
6. Saad Y. Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems (2nd edn). SIAM: Philadelphia, 2003.
7. van der Sluis A, van der Vorst HA. The rate of convergence of conjugate gradients. Numerische Mathematik 1986; 48:543-560.
8. Nicolaides RA. Deflation of conjugate gradients with applications to boundary value problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1987; 24(2):355-365.
9. Mansfield L. On the use of deflation to improve the convergence of the conjugate gradient iteration. Communications in Applied Numerical Methods 1988; 4:151-156
10. Erhel J, Burrage K, Pohl B. Restarted gmres preconditioned by deflation. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 1996; 69:303-318.
11. Saad Y, Yeung M, Erhel J, Guyomarc'h F. A deflated version of the conjugate gradient algorithm. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2000; 21(5):1909-1926.
12. Cebral JR, Castro MA, Appanaboyina S, Putman CM, Millán D, Frangi AF. Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Transactions in Medical Imaging 2005; 24(1):457-467.
13. Löhner R, Yang C, Cebral JR, Camelli F, Soto O, Waltz J. Improving the speed and accuracy of projectiontype incompressible flow solvers. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195(23-24): 3087-3109.
14. Löhner R. Projective prediction of pressure increments. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 2005; 21(4):201-207.