Chemically-mediated predator inspection behavior by fathead minnow (pimephales promelas)

Journal of Freshwater Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 279-283

  Fincel, M J ^a   Chipps, S R ^a   Voldseth, R A ^b  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; CHEMICAL CUE; CONSPECIFIC; CYPRINID; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; HABITAT TYPE; ODOR; OPEN WATER; PREDATION RISK; VEGETATION COVER; VISUAL CUE;

CYPRINIDAE; ESOX LUCIUS; PIMEPHALES PROMELAS; PISCES;

EID: 77952988076     PISSN: 02705060     EISSN: 21566941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2010.9665078     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brown, G. E., and Godin, J.-G. J., 1999a. Who dares, learns:chemical inspection behaviour and acquired predator recognition in a characin fish. Anim. Behav., 57:475–481.
2. Brown, G. E., and Godin, J.-G. J., 1999b. Chemical alarm signals in Trinidadian guppies:laboratory and field evidence. Can. J. Zool., 77:562–570.
3. Brown, G. E., and Schwarzbauer, E. M., 2001. Chemically mediated predator inspection behaviour in the absence of predator visual cues by a characin fish:the effects of predator diet. Behaviour, 138:727–739.
4. Brown, G. E., and Zachar, M. M., 2002. Chemical predatory inspection in a characin fish (Hemigrammus erythrozonus, Characidae, Ostariophysi):the effects of mixed predator diet. Ethology, 108:451–461.
5. Brown, G. E., Chivers, D. P., and Smith, R. J.F., 1995. Fathead minnows avoid conspecific and heterospecific alarm pheremones in the feces of northern pike. J. Fish. Biol., 47:387–393.
6. Brown, G. E., Paige, J. A., and Godin, J. J., 2000. Chemically mediated predator inspection behaviour in the absence of predator visual cues by a characin fish. Anim. Behav., 60:315–321.
7. Chivers, D. P., and Smith, R. J.F., 1994a. Intra- and inter specific avoidance of areas marked with skin extract from brook sticklebacks (Culaea inconstans) in a natural habitat. J. Chem. Ecol., 20:1517–1524.
8. Chivers, D. P., and Smith, R. J.F., 1994b. The role of experience and chemical alarm signaling in predator recognition by fathead minnows. J. Fish. Biol., 44:273–285.
9. Chivers, D. P., and Smith, R. J.F., 1998. Chemical alarm signaling in aquatic predator-prey systems:a review and prospectus. Ecoscience, 5:338–352.
10. Chivers, D. P., Brown, G. E., and Smith, R. J.F., 1995. Familiarity and shoal cohesion in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas):implications for antipredator behaviour. Can. J. Zool., 73:955–960.
11. Dugatkin, L. A., and Godin, J.-G. J., 1992a. Prey approaching predators:a cost-benefit perspective. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 29:233–252.
12. Dugatkin, L. A., and Godin, J.-G. J., 1992b. Predator inspection, shoaling and foraging under predation hazard in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Environ. Biol. Fishes., 34:265–276.
13. Godin, J.-G. J., and Crossman, S. L., 1994. Hunger-dependent predator inspection and foraging behaviours in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) under predation rish. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 34:359–366.
14. Godin, J.-G. J., and Davis, S. A., 1995. Who dares, benefits:predator approach behaviour in the guppy (Poecilia reticulate) deters predator pursuit. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 262:107–112.
15. Godin, J. J., and Dugatkin, L. A., 1996. Female mating preference for bold males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 93:10262–10267.
16. Kulling, D., and Milinksi, M., 1992. Size dependent predation risk and partner quality in predator inspection of sticklebacks. Anim. Behav., 44:949–955.
17. Licht, T., 1989. Discriminating between hungry and satiated predators:The response of guppies (Poecilia reticulate) from high and low predation sites. Etheology, 82:238–243.
18. Magurran, A. E., 1986. Predator inspection behaviour in minnow shoals:differences between populations and individuals. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 19:267–273.
19. Magurran, A. E., Seghers, B. H., Carvalho, G. R., and Shaw, P. W., 1993. Evolution of adaptive variation in antipredator behaviour. Mar. Behav. Physiol., 23:29–44.
20. Mathis, A., and Smith, R. J.F., 1993. Fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, learn to recognize northern pike, Esox lucius, as predators on the basis of chemical stimuli from minnows in the pike's diet. Anim. Behav., 46:645–656.
21. Mathis, A., and Smith, R. J.F., 1993b. Intraspecific and cross superorder responses to chemical alarm signals by brook sticklebacks. Ecology, 74:2395–2404.
22. Mathis, A., Chivers, D. P., and Smith, R. J.F., 1993. Population differences in responses of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) to visual and chemical stimuli from predators. Ethology, 93:31–40.
23. Murphy, K. E., and Pitcher, T. J., 1997. Predator attack motivation influences the inspection behaviour of European minnows. J. Fish. Biol., 50:407–417.
24. Neumann, R. M., 1994. Growth, distribution, and movement of northern pike in a South Dakota natural lake, with sampling considerations Ph.D. dissertation, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, U.S.A
25. Pfeiffer, W., 1977. The distribution of fright reaction and alarm substance cells in fishes. Copeia, 1977:653–665.
26. Pitcher, T., 1992. Who dares wins:the function and evolution of predator inspection behaviour in shoaling fish. Neth. J. Zool., 42:371–391.
27. Pitcher, T. J., 1993. Behavior of teleost fishes, 2nd ed. London:Chapman and Hall, London.
28. Pitcher, T. J., Green, D. A., and Magunan, A. E., 1986. Dicing with death:predator inspection behaviour in minnow shoals. J. Fish. Biol., 28:439–448.
29. Walling, C. A., Dawnay, N., Kazem, A. J.N., and Wright, J., 2004. Predator inspection behaviour in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus):body size, local predation pressure and cooperation. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 56:164–170.