Challenging nuclear: Antinuclear movements in postauthoritarian Indonesia

East Asian Science, Technology and Society

Volumn 3, Issue 2-3, 2009, Pages 343-366

  Amir, Sulfikar ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Antinuclear movements; Civic epistemology; Indonesia; Nuclear power; Organized resistance; Risk and distrust

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952977100     PISSN: 18752160     EISSN: 18752152     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12280-009-9091-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abraham, I. (1998). The making of the Indian atomic bomb: Science, secrecy and the postcolonial state. London: Zed.
2. Amir, S. (2007). Nationalist rhetoric and technological development: the Indonesian aircraft industry in the new order regime. Technology in Society, 29(3), 283-293.
3. Amir, S. (2008). The engineers versus the economists: The disunity of technocracy in Indonesian development. Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, 28(4), 316-323.
4. Amir, S. (2009). Nuclear revival in post-Suharto Indonesia. Asian Survey, in press.
5. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Newbury Park: Sage.
6. Culla, A. S. (2006). Rekonstruksi civil society: Wacana dan Aksi Ornop di Indonesia. Jakarta: LP3ES.
7. Cornejo, R. M. (2000). When Sukarno sought the bomb: Indonesian nuclear aspirations in the Mid 1960s. The Nonproliferation Review, 7, 31-43.
8. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10. Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham: Duke University Press.
11. Flam, H. (ed). (1994). States and anti-nuclear movements. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
12. Frickel, S. (2004). Just science?: Organizing scientist activism in the US environmental justice movement. Science as Culture, 13(4), 449-469.
13. Halfmann, J. (1999). Community and life-chances: Risk movements in the United States and Germany. Environmental Values, 8, 177-197.
14. Hecht, G. (1998). The radiance of France: Nuclear power and national identity after World War II. Cambridge: MIT Press.
15. Hess, D. J. (2007). Alternative pathways in science and industry: Activism, innovation, and the environment in an era of globalization. Cambridge: MIT Press.
16. Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17. Kitschelt, H. P. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 57-85.
18. Latour, B., &Weibel, P. (eds). (2005). Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Poneman, D. (1982). Nuclear power in the developing world. London: Allen and Unwin.
20. Price, J. (1982). The antinuclear movement. Boston: Twayne.
21. Schiller, J., Lucas, A., & Sulistiyanto, P. (2008). Learning from the East Java Mudflow: Disaster politics in Indonesia. Indonesia, 85, 51-77.
22. Sclove, R. (1995) Democracy and technology. New York: Guilford Press.
23. Scott, A. (1990). Ideology and the new social movements. London: Unwin Hyman.
24. Suseno, F. M. (2008). Mengapa PLTN Muria Tidak Boleh Dibangun Sekarang? In N. Wiratmoko (Ed.), Melawan Iblis Mephistopheles. Salatiga: Marem-Pustaka Percik.
25. Winner, L. (2004). Trust and terror: The vulnerability of complex socio-technical systems. Science as Culture, 13(2), 155-172.
26. Woodhouse, E. J., & Breyman, S. (2005). Green chemistry as social movement? Science, Technology & Human Values, 30(2), 199-222.