Uterus conserving prolapse surgery-what is the chance of missing a malignancy?

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 819-821

  Renganathan, Arasee ^a   Edwards, Robin ^a   Duckett, Jonathan R A ^a  

^a MEDWAY MARITIME HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conservative; Malignancy; Prolapse

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER RISK; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DATA BASE; ENDOMETRIUM CARCINOMA; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPLICATION; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; UTERUS;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; UTERUS;

EID: 77952972865     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1101-9     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. HJ Van Brummen G van de Pol CI Aalders AP Heintz CH van der Vaart 2003 Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as a primary treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms Int Urogynecol J 14 3 50 55
2. T Van den Bosch D Van Schoubroeck E Domali I Vergote P Moerman F Amant, et al. 2007 A thin and regular endometrium on ultrasound is very unlikely in patients with endometrial malignancy Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29 6 674 679 10.1002/uog.4031 17523157 (Pubitemid 46975106)
3. S Srikrishna D Robinson L Cardozo J Yazbek D Jurkovic 2008 Is transvaginal ultrasound a worthwhile investigation for women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy? J Obstet Gynaecol 28 4 418 420 10.1080/01443610802149954 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cvjsV2rsQ%3D%3D 18604678 (Pubitemid 351950923)
4. LG Koss 1995 Detection of occult endometrial carcinoma J Cell Biochem Supp 23 165 173 10.1002/jcb.240590922 1:STN:280:DyaK28zmtlaruw%3D%3D
5. HA Salmon JH Smith M Balsitis 2002 Is microscopic assessment of macroscopically normal hysterectomy specimens necessary? J Clin Pathol 55 1 67 68 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FpsVyjug%3D%3D 11825929
6. T Andrews H Monaghan 2008 Is microscopic examination of hysterectomy specimens removed for clinically benign disease necessary? J Clin Pathol 61 2 235 236 10.1136/jcp.2007.049601 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c%2FlvVyisQ%3D%3D 17675534 (Pubitemid 351218888)