Solving the vaginal birth after cesarean dilemma

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 115, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1112-1113

  Scott, James R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INSURANCE; LAW SUIT; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; NEWBORN MORTALITY; NULLIPARA; OBSTETRIC CARE; OBSTETRIC EMERGENCY; PERINATAL MORBIDITY; PERINATAL MORTALITY; PLACENTA ACCRETA; PREGNANCY DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRIAL OF LABOR; UMBILICAL CORD PROLAPSE; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; UNITED STATES; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 77952967054     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e0d1b6     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. National Institutes of Health. Consensus Development Conference on Cesarean Childbirth. Pub. No.82:2067. Washington, DC: NIH; 1981.
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee statement guidelines for vaginal delivery after cesarean childbirth. Washington, DC: ACOG, 1982.
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal Birth After Previous Cesarean Delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin 5. Washington, DC: ACOG 1999.
4. Leung AS, Farmer RM, Leung EK, Medearis AL, Paul RH. Risk factors associated with uterine rupture during trial of labor after cesarean delivery: a case control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1358-1363
5. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights: March 8-10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1279-1295