Editorial: Comparative effectiveness research: Challenges for medical journals

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 301-303

  Sox, Harold C ^a   Helfand, Mark ^b   Grimshaw, Jeremy ^c   Dickersin, Kay ^d   Tovey, David ^e   Knottnerus, J André ^f   Tugwell, Peter ^g  

^a DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^e The Cochrane Library   (United Kingdom)

^f MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^g UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRICS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARD;

BIBLIOMETRICS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING;

EID: 77952962591     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10370815     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Eden J, Wheatley B, McNeil B, Sox H, eds. Committee on Reviewing Evidence to Identify Highly Effective Clinical Services, Institute of Medicine. Knowing What Works in Health Care: A Roadmap for the Nation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press ; 2008. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id= 12038. Accessed; 26 March 2010.
2. Moynihan R., Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Paulsen E. Evidence-Informed Health Policy: Using Research to Make Health Systems Healthier. Rapport Nr 1-2008. Oslo: Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten.
3. World Health Organization. WHA 58.34 Ministerial Summit on Health Research. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf-files/WHA58/WHA58-34- en.pdf.Accessed; 30 November 2009.
4. UK Department of Health. Best Research for Best Health: A New National Health Research Strategy. 2006. Report 272605. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-4127127. Accessed; 26 March 2010.
5. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press ; 2009. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id=12648. Accessed; 26 March 2010.
6. Simera I., Altman DG, Moher D., Schulz KF, Hoey J. Guidelines for reporting health research: the EQUATOR networks survey of guideline authors. PLoS Med. 2008 ; 5: e139.
7. PLoS Medicine Editors. Ensuring integrity in comparative effectiveness research: accentuate the negative. PLoS Med. 2009 ; 6: e1000152.