Towards a composite modelling approach for multitasking

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 86, Issue , 2004, Pages 17-24

  Wild, Peter J ^a   Johnson, Peter ^a   Johnson, Hilary ^a  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Events; Exceptions interruptions; Goals; Multitasking; Tasks

Indexed keywords

EVENTS; IT ARTEFACT; KNOWLEDGE WORK; MULTIPLE TASKS; TASK ANALYSIS; TEMPORAL ASPECTS;

JOB ANALYSIS; MULTITASKING;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 77952961608     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1045446.1045452     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Cypher, A. The Structure of User's Activities. in Norman, D.A. and Draper, S. eds. User Centred systems Design, LEA, Hillsdale NJ., 1986, 243-263.
2. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E. and Wilhite, S., A Diary Study of Task Switching and Interruptions. in CHI 2004, 175-182.
3. Diaper, D. Understanding Task Analysis for HCI. in Diaper, D. and Stanton, N.A. eds. The Handbook Of Task Analysis For Human-Computer Interaction, LEA, Mahwah, NJ., 2004, 5-47.
4. Dix, A., Ramduny, D. and Wilkinson, J. Interacting in the Large. Interacting with Computers, 11 (1). 9-32.
5. González, V.M. and Mark, G., Constant, Constant, Multi-tasking Craziness. in CHI 2004, 113-119.
6. Johnson, H., O'Neill, E.J. and Johnson, P., Workshop on 'Interaction in the Large. in CHI'99, ACM Press.
7. Johnson, P., Johnson, H. and Hamilton, F. Getting The Knowledge Into HCI. in Schraagen, J.M., Chipman, S.F. and Shalin, V.L. eds. Cognitive Task Analysis, LEA, Mahwah, NJ, 2000, 201-214.
8. Lee, H. Time and Information Technology: Monochronicity, Polychronicity and Temporal Symmetry. European Journal of Information Systems, 8 (1). 16-26.
9. Limbourg, J. and Vanderdonckt, J. Comparing Task Models for User Interface Design. in Diaper, D. and Stanton, N.A. eds. The Handbook Of Task Analysis For HCI, LEA, Mahwah, NJ., 2004, 135-154.
10. McFarlane, D.C. Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction, Navy Center for Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence Information Technology Division, Washington, 1997.
11. Miyata, Y. and Norman, D.A. Psychological Issues in Support of Multiple Activities. in Norman, D.A. and Draper, S. eds. User Centred systems Design, LEA, Hillsdale NJ., 1986, 265-284.
12. Pashler, H. Task Switching and Multitask Performance. in Monsell, S. and Driver, J. eds. Attention and Performance XVIII, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2000.
13. Paternò, F. ConcurTaskTrees: An Engineered Notation for Task Models. in Diaper, D. and Stanton, N.A. eds. The Handbook Of Task Analysis For HCI, LEA, Mahwah, NJ., 2004, 483-501.
14. van Welie, M. and van der Veer, G.C. Groupware Task Analysis. in Hollnagel, E. ed. Handbook Of Cognitive Task Design, LEA., NJ, 2003, 447-476.
15. Vicente, K.J. Cognitive Work Analysis. LEA, Mahwah, 1999.
16. Wild, P.J. and Johnson, P., Deepening Consideration of Temporal Factors in Task Knowledge Structures. position paper presented at, Workshop on 'Temporal Aspects of Work for HCI'. CHI'2004,.
17. Wild, P.J., Johnson, P. and Johnson, H., An Hour In The Life, in CHI'2003, ACM Press, 1016-1017.
18. Wild, P.J., Johnson, P. and Johnson, H., Understanding Task Grouping Strategies, Proceedings of HCI 2003: Designing for Society, Springer-Verlag, 3-20, (2003).
19. Yeh, W. and Barsalou, L.W. The Situated Character of Concepts. Under review, downloaded March 2002.