Distribution of early-arriving saproxylic beetles on standing dead Scots pine trees

Agricultural and Forest Entomology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 133-141

  Foit, Jiří ^a  

^a MENDEL UNIVERSITY IN BRNO   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Bark; Diversity; Pinus sylvestris; Saproxylic beetles; Spatial distribution; Tree diameter

Indexed keywords

COLEOPTERA; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 77952947847     PISSN: 14619555     EISSN: 14619563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2009.00461.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bense U. Longhorn Beetles-Illustrated Key to the Cerambycidae and Vesperidae of Europe 1995, Margraf ferlag, Weikersheim
2. Bílý S. Krascoviti (Buprestidae) 1989, Academia, Czech Republic
3. Bílý S. Larvae of buprestid beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) of Central Europe. Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 1999, 9:1-45. Supplementum
4. Braun-Blanquet J. Plant Sociology, The Study of Plant Communities 1932, McGraw-Hill Book, New York, New York
5. Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzuge der Vegetationskunde 1964, Springer, New York, New York
6. Esseen PA, Ehnström B, Ericsson L, Sjöberg K. Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins 1997, 46:16-47.
7. Grove SJ. Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2002, 33:1-23.
8. Hjältén J, Johansson T, Alinvi O. The importance of substrate type, shading and scorching for the attractiveness of dead wood to saproxylic beetles. Basic and Applied Entomology 2007, 8:364-376.
9. Ibeas F, Gallego D, Diez JJ, Pajares JA. An operative kairomonal lure for managing pine sawyer beetle Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 2007, 131:13-20.
10. Jacobs JM, Spence JR, Langor DW. Influence of boreal forest succession and dead wood qualities on saproxylic beetles. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2007, 9:3-16.
11. Jonsell M, Weslien J. Felled or standing retained wood-it makes a difference for saproxylic beetles. Forest Ecology and Management 2003, 175:425-435.
12. Jonsell M, Weslien J, Ehnström B. Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiversity and Conservation 1998, 7:749-764.
13. Jonsell M, Nittérus K, Stighäll K. Saproxylic beetles in natural and man-made decidious high stumps retained for conservation. Biological Conservation 2004, 118:163-173.
14. Jonsell M, Schroeder M, Weslien J. Saproxylic beetles in high stumps of spruce: fungal flora important for determining the species composition. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 2005, 20:54-62.
15. Jonsell M, Hansson J, Wedmo L. Diversity of saproxylic beetle speciesin logging residues in Sweden-comparisons between tree species and diameters. Biological Conservation 2007, 138:89-99.
16. Jonsson BG, Kruys N, Ranius T. Ecology of species living on dead wood-lessons for dead wood management. Silva Fennica 2005, 39:289-309.
17. Kaila L, Martikainen P, Punttila P. Dead trees left in clear-cuts benefit saproxylic Coleoptera adapted to natural disturbances in boreal forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 1997, 6:1-18.
18. Knížek M, Liška J. Faunistic records from the Czech Republic: Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Orthotomicus robustus (Knotek, 1899), Orthotomicus longicollis (Gyllenhal, 1827). Klapalekiana 1996, 32:76.
19. Krogerus R. Beobachtung über die Succesion einiger Insektenbiocoenosen in Frichtenstümpfen. Notulae Entomologicae 1927, 7:121-126.
20. Larkin PA, Elbourn CA. Some observation on the fauna of dead wood in live oak trees. Oikos 1964, 15:79-92.
21. Lindhe A, Lindelöw A. Cut high stumps of spruce, birch, aspen and oak as breeding substrates for saproxylic beetles. Forest Ecology and Management 2004, 203:1-20.
22. Lindhe A, Lindelow A, Asenblad N. Saproxylic beetles in standing dead wood density in relation to substrate sunexposure and diameter. Biodiversity and Conservation 2005, 14:3033-3053.
23. Manly BFJ. Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology 1991, Chapman & Hall, U.K
24. Martikainen P, Siitonen J, Punttila P, Kaila L, Rauh J. Species richness of Coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Biological Conservation 2000, 94:199-209.
25. McGeoch MA, Schroeder M, Ekbom B, Larsson S. Saproxylic beetle diversity in managed boreal forest: importance of stand characteristics and forestry conservation measures. Diversity and Distribution 2007, 13:418-429.
26. Økland B, Bakke A, Hagva S, Kvamme T. What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodiversity and Conservation 1996, 5:75-100.
27. Pajares JA, Ibeas F, Diez JJ, Gallego D. Attractive responses by Monochamus galloprovincialis (Col., Cerambycidae) to host and bark beetle semiochemicals. Journal of Applied Entomology 2004, 128:633-638.
28. Palm T. Die Holz- und Rindenkäfer der süd- und mittelschwedischen Laubbäume. Opuscula Entomologica 1959, 16:1-374. Supplement
29. Peltonen M, Heliövaara K. Attack density and breeding success of bark beetles (Col., Scolytidae) at different distances from forest clearcut-edge. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 1999, 1:237-242.
30. Pfeffer A. Zentral- und westpalaarktische Borken- und Kernkiifer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Platypodidae) 1995, Pro Entomologia, Naturhistorisches Museum, Switzerland
31. Rosenzweig ML. Species Diversity in Space and Time 1995, Cambridge University Press, New York, New York
32. Safranyik L, Linton DA, Shore TL. Temporal and vertical distribution of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) captured in barrier traps at baited and unbaited lodgepole pines the year following attack by the mountain pine beetle. Canadian Entomologist 2000, 132:799-810.
33. Schiegg K. Effects of dead wood volume and connectivity on saproxylic insect species diversity. Ecoscience 2000, 7:290-298.
34. Siitonen J. Decaying wood and saproxylic Coleoptera in two old spruce forests: a comparison based on two sampling methods. Annales Zoologici Fennici 1994, 31:89-95.
35. Siitonen J. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecology Bulletins 2001, 49:11-41.
36. Similä M, Kouki J, Martikainen P, Uotila A. Conservation of beetles in boreal pine forests: the effects of forest age and naturalness on species assemblages. Biodiversity and Conservation 2002, 106:19-27.
37. Similä M, Kouki J, Martikainen P. Saproxylic beetles in managed and seminatural Scots pine forests: quality of dead wood matters. Forest Ecology and Management 2003, 174:365-381.
38. Electronic Statistics Textbook 2007, http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stathome.html, StatSoft, Inc., StatSoft, Tulsa, Oklahoma, [WWW document]. URL, [accessed on 28 March 2008]
39. Stork NE, Hammond PM, Russell BL, Hadwen WL. The spatial distribution of beetles within the canopies of oak trees in Richmond Park, U.K. Ecological Entomology 2001, 26:302-311.
40. Su JC, Woods SA. Importance of sampling along a vertical gradient to compare the insects fauna in managed forests. Environmental Entomology 2001, 30:400-408.
41. Švácha P, Danilevsky ML. Cerambycoid larvae of Europe and Soviet Union (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Part I. Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Biologica 1986, 30:1-176.
42. Švácha P, Danilevsky ML. Cerambycoid larvae of Europe and Soviet Union (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Part II. Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Biologica 1987, 31:121-284.
43. Švácha P, Danilevsky ML. Cerambycoid larvae of Europe and Soviet Union (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Part III. Acta Universitatis Carolinae-Biologica 1988, 32:1-205.
44. Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Ims RA. The effect of forest clearcutting in Norway on the community of saproxylic beetles on aspen. Biological Conservation 2002, 106:347-357.
45. Ter Braak CJF. Canonical correspondence analysis: a. new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 1986, 67:1167-1179.
46. Ter Braak CJF. CANOCO, A Fortran Program for Community Ordination by (Partial) (Detrended) (Canonical) Correspondence Analysis, Principal Components Analysis and Redundancy Analysis, Version 2.1. 1987, The Netherlands
47. Ulyshen MD, Hanula JL. A comparison of the beetle (Coleoptera) fauna captured at two heights above the ground in a North American temperate deciduous forest. American Midland Naturalist 2007, 158:260-278.
48. Ulyshen MD, Hanula JL, Horn S, Kilgo JC, Moorman CE. Spatial and temporal patterns of beetles associated with coarse woody debrise in managed bottomland hardwood forests. Forest Ecology and Management 2004, 199:259-272.
49. Väisänen R, Biström O, Heliövaara K. Sub-cortical Coleoptera in dead pines and spruces: is primeval species composition maintained in managed forests? Biodiversity and Conservation 1993, 2:95-113.
50. Vance CC, Kirby KR, Malcolm JR, Smith SM. Community composition of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in the canopy and understorey of sugar maple and white pine stands in South-Central Ontario. Environmental Entomology 2003, 32:1066-1074.
51. Vanderwel MC, Malcolm JR, Smith SM, Islam N. Insect community composition and trophic guild structure in decaying logs from eastern Canadian pine-dominated forests. Forest Ecology and Management 2006, 225:190-199.
52. Wallace HR. The ecology of the insect fauna of pine stumps. Journal of Animal Ecology 1953, 22:154-171.
53. Wermelinger B, Flückiger PF, Obrist MK, Duelli P. Horizontal and vertical distribution of saproxylic beetles (Col., Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Scolytinae) across sections of forest edges. Journal of Applied Entomology 2007, 131:104-114.
54. Zhang QH, Byers JA, Zhang XD. Influence of bark thickness, trunk diameter and height on reproduction of the longhorned beetle, Monochamus sutor (Col., Cerambycidae) in burned larch and pine. Journal of Applied Entomology 1993, 115:145-154.