Negotiation of normality and identity among migrants from eastern europe to the United Kingdom after 2004

Social Identities

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 285-296

  Rabikowska, Marta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMMIGRANT POPULATION; NATIONAL IDENTITY; NEGOTIATION PROCESS;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 77952943058     PISSN: 13504630     EISSN: 13630296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504630.2010.482391     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson, R., Fish, M.S., Hanson, S.E., & Roeder, P.G. (2001). Postcommunism and the theory of democracy. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
2. Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries. Boston: Little, Brown.
3. Bauman, Z. (1992). Intimations of postmodernity. London: Routledge.
4. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.
5. Bhabha, H.K. (2007). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
6. BlaŻyca, G., & Da {ogonek}browski, J.M. (Eds.). (1995). Monitoring economic transition. The Polish case. London: Ashgate.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1982[1979]). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
8. Bunce, V. (1995). Should transitologists be grounded? Slavic Review, 54(1), 111-127.
9. Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5-21.
10. Clifford, J. (1994). Diasporas. Cultural Anthropology, 9(3), 302-338.
11. Dobry, M. (Ed.). (2000). Democratic and capitalist transitions in Eastern Europe. Dordrecht Boston London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Durkheim, E. (1982[1895]). The rules of sociological method. (W.D. Halls, Trans.). New York: The Free Press.
13. Durkheim, E. (1983[1895]). Crime and social health.(A. Scull, Trans.). Reprinted as Durkheim's reply to Tarde. In S. Lukes & A. Scull (Eds.), Durkheim and the Law (pp. 92-101). Oxford: Martin Robertson.
14. Fatyga, B., & Tyszkiewicz, A. (Eds.). (2001). Normalnóć i normalka. Próba zastosowania poje{ogonek}cia normalnóci do badań mlodzieŻy [Normality and normalcy. An attempt to apply the notion of normality in research on the youth]. Warszawa: OBM.
15. Fortier, A.M. (2000). Migrant belongings. Memory, space, identity. Oxford: Berg.
16. Fuller, L. (2000). Socialism and the transition in East and Central Europe: The homogeneity paradigm, class, and economic inefficiency. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 585-609.
17. Garapich, M. (2008). The migration industry and civil society: Polish immigrants in the United Kingdom before and after EU enlargement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(5),735-752.
18. Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Stanford: University of Stanford Press.
20. Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. Gill, G. (2002). Democracy and post-communism. Political change in the post-communist world. London and New York: Routledge.
22. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
23. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. New York: Harper and Row.
24. Kearney, M., & Beserra, B. (2004). Migration and identities a class-based approach. Latin American Perspectives, 31(5), 3-14.
25. Kim, S.H. (2004). Max Weber's politics of civil society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. King, C. (2000). Post-postcommunism: transition, comparison, and the end of 'Eastern-Europe'. World Politics, 53(1), 143-172.
27. Lyotard, J.F. (2004[1979]). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans., F. Jameson, Foreword). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
28. Marcus, G.E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.
29. Murko, M.D., Flajšman, B., Vezjak, B., & Štrajn, D. (Eds.). (2008). Five minutes of democracy. The image of Slovenia after 2004. Ljubljana: The Liberal Academy.
30. Nadai, E., & Maeder, C. (2005). Fuzzy fields. Multi-sited ethnography in sociological research. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), art. 28. Retrieved December 13, 2008, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/
31. Nagle, D.J., & Mahr, A. (1999). Democracy and democratization. Post-communist Europe in comparative perspective. London: Sage.
32. Nodia, G. (2002). How different are post-communist transitions? In L. Diamond & M. Plattner (Eds.), Democracy after Communism (pp. 3-18). New York: Johns Hopkins.
33. Opalski, M. (Ed.). Managing diversity in plural societies: Minorities, migration and nation-building in post-Communist Europe. Nepean, Ont.: Forum Eastern Europe.
34. Outhwaite, W., & Ray, L. (2005). Social theory and postcommunism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
35. Rabikowska, M. (Guest Ed.) (2009). Introduction: The ghosts of the past: 20 years after the fall of communism in Europe [Special Issue]. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 42(20), 165-179.
36. Sakwa, R. (1999). Postcommunism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
37. Schmitter, P., & Lynn Karl, T. (1994). The conceptual travels of transitologists and consolidologists: How far to the East should they attempt to go? SlavicReview, 53(1), 173-185.