Improving Impact: Evidence-Based Policing or Fostering Community Participation through Action Research and Communities of Practice?

Handbook of Police Administration

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 357-386

  Layton, Catherine ^a   Jennett, Christine ^a  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952939793     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315093222-23     Document Type: Chapter

References (88)

1. Eck, J.E., Learning from experience in problem-oriented policing and situational prevention:the positive functions of weak evaluations and the negative functions of strong ones, in Evaluation for crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies 14, Tilley, N., Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, 2002.
2. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, Evidence-Based Medicine: A New Approach to Teaching the Practice of Medicine, based on the Users’ Guides to Evidence-based Medicine and reproduced with permission from LAMA 268(17) American Medical Association, 1992. Retrieved from http: //www. cche.net/usersguides/ebm. asp#Abstract.
3. Kuhn, T., The structure of scientific revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1962.
4. Grabosky, P., The Campbell Collaboration: what works in criminal justice, Delivering crime prevention: making the evidence work conference, sponsored by the Australian Institute of Criminology and Attorney General’s Department of New South Wales, Carlton Crest Hotel, Sydney, 21-22 November, 2006.
5. Bushell, C., personal communication, 2006.
6. Sherman, L.W., Evidence-based policing, Ideas in American policing, Police Foundation, 1998.
7. Sherman, L.W., Evidence-based policing, Ideas in American policing, Police Foundation, 1998, p. 1.
8. Giddens, A., The consequences of modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1991.
9. Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T.W., Dialectic of enlightenment, trans. Cumming, Continuum, New York, 1969.
10. Geuss, R., The idea of a critical theory, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1981.
11. Harding, S., Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1991.
12. Duran, J., Philosophies of Science/Feminist Theories, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1998.
13. Dick, B., Sources of rigour in action research: addressing the issues of trustworthiness and credibility. Paper presented at the Association for Qualitative Research Conference ‘Issues of rigour in qualitative research’ at the Duxton Hotel, Melbourne, Victoria, 6-10 July 1999.
14. Nutley, S., The impact of research and evaluation on policy formation and delivery, Occasional Seminar, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, December 2006.
15. Reiner, R., The politics of the police (3rd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
16. Doyal, L. and Harris, R., Empiricism, explanation and rationality: an introduction to the philosophy of the social, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1986.
17. Burkitt, I., Bodies of thought: embodiment, identity and modernity, Sage, London, 1999.
18. Burkitt, I., Social selves: theories of the social formation of personality, Current Sociology, 39(3), 1991.
19. Mead, G.H., Mind, self and society: from the standpoint of a social behaviourist, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1987.
20. Goffman, I., Interaction ritual: essays on face to face behaviour, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1972.
21. Goffman, I., The presentation of self in everyday life, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1976.
22. Zeichner, K.M., Reflective training and field-based experience in teacher education, Interchange, 12(4), 1982.
23. Schön, D.A., How professionals think in action, Basic Books, New York, 1983.
24. Boud, D., Keogh, R., and Walker, D., Eds., Reflection: turning experience into learning, Kogan Page, New York, 1986.
25. Boud, D. and Miller, N., Eds., Working with experience: animating learning, Routledge, London, 2001.
26. Damasio, A., Descartes’ error: emotion, reason and the human brain, Papermac, London, 1996.
27. Layton, C., Learning selves: a case study of police students’ learning in community placements, using diaries, Ph.D. thesis, University of Technology, Sydney, 2004.
28. Forsyth, D.R., An introduction to group dynamics, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, CA, 1983.
29. Becker, H.S., “Foi por Acaso”: Conceptualizing Coincidence, Sociological Quarterly, 36, 1994, pp. 183-194.
30. N.C.A.V.C., Pathways to prevention: developmental and early intervention approaches to crime in Australia, Commonwealth Attorney Generals Department, Canberra, 1999.
31. Lanier, M.M. and Henry, S., Essential criminology, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 2004.
32. Crawford, A., Crime prevention and community safety: politics, policies and practices, Longman, London, 1998, p. 6.
33. Sherman, L.W., Policing for crime prevention, in Preventing crime: what works, what doesn’t, what’s promising, Sherman, L.W., Gottfredson, D.C., MacKenzie, D.L., Eck, J., Reuter, P. and Bushway, S.D., Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, 1997, p. 3. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.org/works/chapter8.html.
34. Hughes, G., Understanding crime prevention, Open University Press, Buckingham, 1998.
35. Eck, J.E., Learning from experience in problem-oriented policing and situational prevention:the positive functions of weak evaluations and the negative functions of strong ones, in Evaluation for crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies 14, Tilley, N., Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, 2002, pp. 93-110.
36. Sherman, L.W. and Eck, J.E., Policing for crime prevention, in Evidence-based crime prevention, Sherman, L.W., Farrington, D.P., Welsh, B.C. and Layton MacKenzie, D., Eds., Routledge, London, 2002, p. 295.
37. Eck, J.E., Learning from experience in problem-oriented policing and situational prevention:the positive functions of weak evaluations and the negative functions of strong ones, in Evaluation for crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies 14, Tilley, N., Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, New York, 2002, p. 111.
38. Sherman, L.W., Policing for crime prevention, in Preventing crime: what works, what doesn’t, what’s promising, Sherman, L.W., Gottfredson, D.C., MacKenzie, D.L., Eck, J., Reuter, P. and Bushway, S.D., Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, 1997. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.org/works/chapter8.html.
39. Homel, R., Issues in police partnerships: U.S./Australian comparisons. Paper presented at the conference Partnerships in Crime Prevention, convened jointly by the Australian Institute of Criminology and the NCAVC, Hobart, 26-27 February1998.
40. Bright, J., The international experience, pre-conference paper for the PPP Conference, 2001. Retrieved from http://www.communitybuilders.nsw.gov. au/building_stronger/place/ppp1_3.html.
41. Arnstein, S.R., A ladder of citizen participation, JAIP, 36(4), 216-224, July 1969. Retrieved from http://lithgow-schmidt.dk/sherry-arnstein/ladder-of-citizen-participation.html.
42. Bull, D. and Stratta, E., Police community consultation: an examination of its practice in England and New South Wales, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 27, 237-249, December 1994.
43. Bull, D. and Stratta, E., Police-community consultative committees: a response to paramilitary policing? Australia and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 31(3), 67-82, 1996.
44. McCallum, D., Stakeholder identification and mobilization: draft tool for the Local-EPM Phase One Toolkit, the Philippines, UNCHS (Habitat)/UNEP, December 2000. Retrieved from http://www.unhabitat.org/cdrom/governance/html/yellop22.htm.
45. Leigh, E., Engaging with theory, putting myself into practice. Keynote address at the Learning and Teaching @ CSU: Bright ideas and evolving evidence Conference, Charles Sturt University: Bathurst, September 2006.
46. Jennett, C, Elliot, G., and Robinson, P., Developing practitioner researchers for policing and related professions, in Innovations in professional practice: influences and perspectives, Rushbrook, P., Ed., in proceedings of the 2003 Continuing Professional Education (CPE) Conference, Centre for Research into Professional Practice Leaning and Education (RIPPLE), 2003.
47. Coghlan, D. and Brannick, T., Doing Action Research in your own Organization, Sage, London, 2001.
48. Stringer, E.T., Action Research, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1999.
49. Dick, B., Areol - action research and evaluation on line, 2006. Retrieved from http:// www.scu.edu.au/schools/sawd/areol/areol.html.
50. Coghlan, D. and Brannick, T., Doing Action Research in your own Organization, Sage, London, 2001, pp. xi-xii.
51. Stringer, E.T., Action Research, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1999, p. 35.
52. Stringer, E.T., Action Research, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1999, p. 29.
53. Habermas, 1979, as cited in Stringer, E.T., Action Research, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1999, p. 32.
54. Stringer, E.T., Action Research, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1999, p. 19.
55. Coghlan, D. and Brannick, T., Doing Action Research in your own Organization, Sage, London, 2001, p. 16.
56. Coghlan, D. and Brannick, T., Doing Action Research in your own Organization, Sage, London, 2001, p. 63.
57. Coghlan, D. and Brannick, T., Doing Action Research in your own Organization, Sage, London, 2001, p. 64.
58. The learning resources for this subject include a Study Guide and readings (on CDRom) and a printed Subject Outline delineating assessment and other requirements.
59. Action Research and Evaluation on Line (Areol) is a 14 week on-line course offered as a public service by Southern Cross University and the Southern Cross Institute of Action Research.
60. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning as a social system, 1998. Retrieved from http://www.co-i-l.com/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/lss.shtml.
61. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
62. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., and Snyder, W.M., Seven principles for cultivating communities of practice, in Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge, Harvard Business School Press, 2001. Retrieved from http://hbswk.has. edu/item.jhtml?id=2866andt=entrepreneurship.
63. Lesser, E.L. and Storck, J., Communities of practice and organizational performance, IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 2001.
64. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, p. 46.
65. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 78-89.
66. Lesser, E.L. and Storck, J., Communities of practice and organizational performance, IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 832, 2001.
67. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 45-46.
68. Lesser, E.L. and Storck, J., Communities of practice and organizational performance, IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 834, 2001.
69. Stewart, T.A., The invisible key to success, Fortune, 134(3), 3, 1996. Retrieved from http://home.att.net/~discon/KM/invisible_key.htm.
70. Sharp, J., Communities of practice: a review of the literature, 4-5, 1997. Retrieved from http://www.tfriend.com/cop-lit.htm.
71. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 74-75.
72. Lesser, E.L. and Storck, J., Communities of practice and organizational performance, IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 834, 2001.
73. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, p. 74.
74. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 74-77.
75. Sharp, J., Communities of practice: a review of the literature, 1997. Retrieved from http://www.tfriend.com/cop-lit.htm.
76. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 51-52.
77. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 56-57.
78. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 91-92.
79. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 103-110.
80. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 156-162.
81. Sharp, J., Key hypotheses in supporting communities of practice, 1997, 1. Retrieved from http://www.tfriend.com/hypothesis.html.
82. Crawford, cited in Cabanis-Brewin, J., Communities of practice in the projectized organisation, Expert Series, 2001, p. 3.
83. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 150-181.
84. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, p. 197.
85. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 197-205.
86. Harrison, S.J., Police organizational culture: using ingrained values to build positive organizational improvement, The Pennsylvania State University 1998, 11. Retrieved from http://www/pamij.com/harrison.html.
87. Doherty, D., Building the next generation of leaders in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, The Canadian Review of Policing Research, 5, 2004. Retrieved from http://crpr. icaap.org/issues/issue1/ddoherty.html.
88. Mead, G., Developing ourselves as police leaders: how can we inquire collaboratively in a hierarchical organization? In P. Reason (Ed.), Special Issue: The Practice of Cooperative Inquiry, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 16(3), 11, 2002. Retrieved from http://www.bath.ac.uk/carpp/SPAR?GeoffMead.htm.