Intraspecific variation in prey quality: A comparison of nutrient presence in prey and nutrient extraction by predators

Oikos

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 350-358

  Wilder, Shawn M ^a   Mayntz, David ^b   Toft, Søren ^d   Rypstra, Ann L ^c   Pilati, Alberto ^a   Vanni, Michael J ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales   (Argentina)

^d AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOOD LIMITATION; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; LARVA; LIPID; NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; PREY SELECTION; PREY SIZE; PROTEIN; SPIDER;

ARANEAE; ARTHROPODA; COLEOPTERA; GRYLLIDAE;

EID: 77952936180     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17819.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Balfour R A. Ontogenetic shifts in competitive interactions and intra-guild predation between two wolf spider species. Ecol. Entomol 2003, 28:25-30.
2. Bernard J B, Allen M. Feeding captive insectivorous animals: nutritional aspects of insects as food 1997, Nutrition Advisory Group, Am. Zoo Aquarium Ass
3. Cohen A C. Extraoral digestion in predaceous terrestrial arthropoda. Annu. Rev. Entomol 1995, 40:85-103.
4. Davidson D W. The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc 1997, 61:153-181.
5. Denno R F, Fagan W F. Might nitrogen limitation promote omnivory among carnivorous arthropods? Ecology 2003, 84:2522-2531.
6. Fagan W F, Denno R F. Stoichiometry of actual vs potential predator-prey interactions: insights into nitrogen limitation for arthropod predators. Ecol. Lett 2004, 7:876-883.
7. Fagan W F. Nitrogen in insects: implications for trophic complexity and species diversification. Am. Nat 2002, 160:784-802.
8. Giron D, Casas J. Mothers reduce egg provisioning with age. Ecol. Lett 2003, 6:273-277.
9. Grover C D. Linking nutrition and behavioral dominance: carbohydrate scarcity limits aggression and activity of Argentine ants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2007, 274:2951-2957.
10. Helms K R, Vinson S B. Plant resources and colony growth in an invasive ant: the importance of honeydew-producing Hemiptera in carbohydrate transfer across trophic levels. Environ. Entomol 2008, 37:487-493.
11. Horowitz H. Official methods of analysis of the AOAC International 2002, AOAC Int, Gaithersburg, MD
12. Howarth R W. Nutrient limitation of net primary production in marine ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S 1988, 19:89-110.
13. Kawooya J K, Law J H. Role of lipophorin in lipid transport to the insect egg. J. Biol. Chem 1988, 263:8748-8753.
14. Malzahn A M. Nutrient limitation of primary producers affects planktivorous fish condition. Limnol. Oceanogr 2007, 52:2062-2071.
15. Matsumura M. Does intraguild predation enhance predator performance? A stoichiometric perspective. Ecology 2004, 85:2601-2615.
16. Mayntz D, Toft S. Nutrient composition of the prey's diet affects growth and survivorship of a generalist predator. Oecologia 2001, 127:207-213.
17. Mayntz D, Toft S. Nutritional value of cannibalism and the role of starvation and nutrient imbalance for cannibalistic tendencies in a generalist predator. J. Anim. Ecol 2006, 75:288-297.
18. Mayntz D. Nutrient-specific foraging in invertebrate predators. Science 2005, 307:111-113.
19. Muller-Navarra D C. Food web paradigms: the biochemical view on trophic interactions. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol 2008, 93:489-505.
20. Oelbermann K, Scheu S. Effects of prey type and mixed diets on survival, growth and development of a generalist predator, Pardosa lugubris (Araneae: Lycosidae). Basic Appl. Ecol 2002, 3:285-291.
21. Polis G A. The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S 1989, 20:297-330.
22. Putman R J. Facts from faeces. Mamm. Rev 1984, 14:79-97.
23. Ramos-Elorduy J. Nutritional value of edible insects from the State of Oaxaca, Mexico. J. Food Composition Anal 1997, 10:142-157.
24. Raubenheimer D, Simpson S J. Integrating nutrition: a geometrical approach. Entomol. Exp. Appl 1999, 91:67-82.
25. Raubenheimer D. Nutrient-specific compensation following diapauses in a predator: implications for intraguild predation. Ecology 2007, 88:2598-2608.
26. Rickers S. Dietary routing of nutrients from prey to offspring in a generalist predator: effects of prey quality. Funct. Ecol 2006, 20:124-131.
27. Rypstra A L, Samu F. Size-dependent intraguild predation and cannibalism in coexisting wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol 2005, 33:390-397.
28. Shine R. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual size dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Q. Rev. Biol 1989, 64:419-461.
29. Simpson S J, Raubenheimer D. A multi-level analysis of feeding behavior: the geometry of nutritional decisions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 1993, 342:381-402.
30. Simpson S J, Raubenheimer D. The geometric analysis of feeding and nutrition: a user's guide. J. Insect Physiol 1995, 41:545-553.
31. Sterner R W, Hessen D O. Algal nutrient limitation and the nutrition of aquatic herbivores. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S 1994, 25:1-29.
32. Sterner R W, Elser J J. Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere 2002, Princeton Univ. Press
33. Toft S, Wise D H. Growth, development, and survival of a generalist predator fed single- and mixed-species diets of different quality. Oecologia 1999, 119:191-197.