Solutions to the research-practice gap in domestic violence: modified delphi study with domestic violence coalition leaders

Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 424-449

  Murray, Christine E ^a   Hall Smith, Paige ^a   Avent, Janeé R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

Delphi study; Domestic violence coalitions; Domestic violence research practice gap

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DELPHI STUDY; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EXPERT SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 77952930998     PISSN: 10926771     EISSN: 1545083X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10926771003781354     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Campbell, J. C., Dienemann, J., Kub, J., Wurmser, T., & Loy, E. (1999). Collaboration as partnership. Violence Against Women, 5, 1140-1157.
2. Corvo, K., & Johnson, P. J. (2003). Vilification of the "batterer": How blame shapes domestic violence policy and interventions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 259-281.
3. Dawson, M. D., & Brucker, P. S. (2001). The utility of the Delphi method in MFT research. American Journal of Family Therapy, 29, 125-140.
4. Dimmitt, C., Carey, J. C., McGannon, W., & Henningson, I. (2005). Identifying a school counseling research agenda: A Delphi study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 44, 214-228.
5. Edleson, J. L., & Bible, A. L. (2001). Collaborating for women's safety: Partnerships between research and practice. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 73-95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Gondolf, E. W., Yllö, K., & Campbell, J. (1997). Collaboration between researchers and advocates. In G. K. Kantor & J. L. Jasinski (Eds.), Out of darkness: Contemporary perspectives on family violence (pp. 255-267). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Guterman, N. B. (2004). Advancing prevention research on child abuse, youth violence, and domestic violence: Emerging strategies and issues. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 299-321.
8. Hamberger, L. K. (2001). Musings of a state standards committee chair. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 5, 265-286.
9. Jenkins, D. A., & Smith, T. E. (1994). Applying Delphi methodology in family therapy research. Contemporary Family Therapy, 16, 411-430.
10. Kilpatrick, D. G., Resick, P. A., & Williams, L. M. (2001). Fostering collaborations between violence against women researchers and practitioners. Social Insight, 6, 29-36.
11. Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical research: Planning and design (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
12. Maiuro, R. D., Hagar, T. S., Lin, H., & Olson, N. (2001). Are current state standards for domestic violence perpetrator treatment adequately informed by research? A question of questions. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 5, 21-44.
13. Morrow-Howell, N., Burnette, D., & Chen, L.-M. (2005). Research priorities for gerontological social work: Researcher and practitioner perspectives. Social Work Research, 29, 231-242.
14. Mouradian, V. E., Mechanic, M. B., & Williams, L. M. (2001). Recommendations for establishing and maintaining successful researcher- practitioner collaborations. Wellesley, MA: National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center, Wellesley College. Retrieved August 29, 2008, from http:// www.musc.edu/vawprevention/general/recom-report.pdf
15. Murray, C. E. (2009). Diffusion of innovation theory: A bridge for the research-practice gap in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 87, 108-116.
16. Murray, C. E., & Smith, P. H. (2009). Perceptions of research and practice among domestic violence researchers. Journal of Aggression, Conflict, and Peace Research, 1, 4-21.
17. Murray, C. E., & Welch, M. (2008). The diffusion of domestic violence research: A statewide survey of service providers. Manuscript submitted for publication. Murray, C. E., & Welch, M. (in press). Preliminary construction of a service providerinformed domestic violence research agenda. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
18. National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center. (2001). Fostering collaborations to prevention violence against women: Integrating findings from practitioner and researcher focus groups. Charleston, SC: Author. Retrieved August 29, 2008, from http://www.musc.edu/vawprevention/research/ Report.pdf
19. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 7. Retrieved April 26, 2006, from http://PAREonline.net/ getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
20. Stone Fish, L., & Busby, D. M. (1996). The Delphi method. In D. H. Sprenkle & S. M. Moon (Eds.), Research methods in family therapy (pp. 469-482). New York, NY: Guilford.
21. White, M. B., Edwards, S. A., & Russell, C. S. (1997). The essential elements of successful marriage and family therapy: A modified Delphi study. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 213-231.
22. Williams, L. M. (2004). Researcher-advocate collaborations to end violence against women: Toward liberating methodologies for action research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1350-1357.