Imaging geophysical data—taking the viewer into account

Archaeological Prospection

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 35-48

  Dennis, T J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alias; Geophysics; Image; Sample; Scanning; Spatial frequency; Visual masking

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952911006     PISSN: 10752196     EISSN: 10990763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/arp.221     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Campbell FW, Robson JG. 1968. Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. J. Physiol. 197: 551-566.
2. Clark A. 1996. Seeing Beneath the Soil: Prospecting Methods in Archaeology. Routledge: London.
3. Crummy P. 1997. City of Victory. Colchester Archaeological Trust: Colchester; 104.
4. Dunnett R. 1971. The excavation of the Roman Theatre at Gosbecks. Britannia 2: 27-47.
5. Ghanbari M. 1999. Video Coding, an Introduction to Standard Codecs. Institution of Electrical Engineers: London; 52.
6. Hawkes CFC, Crummy P. 1995. Colchester Archaeological Report 11: Camulodunum 2. Colchester Archeological Trust: Colchester.
7. Nyquist H. 1928. Certain topics in telegraph transmission theory. Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers 47: 617-644.
8. Pearson DE. 1975. Transmission and Display of Pictorial Information. Pentech Press: London; 44, 48.
9. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. 1992. Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
10. Scollar I, Tabbagh A, Hesse A, Herzog I. 1990. Archaeological Prospecting and Remote Sensing. Topics in Remote Sensing, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.