Redevelopment, San Diego style: The limits of public-private partnerships

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 644-678

  Erie, Steven P ^a   Kogan, Vladimir ^a   MacKenzie, Scott A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Agency theory; Public private partnerships; Redevelopment; San Diego; Sports stadiums; Urban politics

Indexed keywords

PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; REDEVELOPMENT; SPORTS FACILITY; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLITICS;

CALIFORNIA; SAN DIEGO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77952897528     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: 15528332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078087409359760     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Altshuler, Alan, and David Luberoff. 2003. Mega-projects: The changing politics of urban public investment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2. Baade, Robert A., and Richard F. Dye. 1990. The impact of stadiums and professional sports on metropolitan area development. Growth and Change 21 (Spring): 1-14.
3. Baxamusa, Murtaza H. 2005. The bottom line: Solutions for San Diego's budget crisis: A comparative analysis of California's largest cities. San Diego, CA: Center on Policy Initiatives.
4. Braun, Gerry. 2005. The smooth operator: Jack McGrory led city hall before the storm hit. Did he lead it into trouble? San Diego Union-Tribune, December 18, A1.
5. Brown, Trevor L., and Matthew Potoski. 2003. Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (4): 441-68.
6. Cagan, Joanna, and Neil DeMause. 1999. Field of Schemes. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.
7. Centre City Development Corporation. 2007. Ballpark scorecard: more than a ballpark. San Diego, CA: Centre City Development Corporation.
8. Chapin, Tim. 2002. Beyond the entrepreneurial city: Municipal capitalism in San Diego. Journal of Urban Affairs 24 (5): 565-81.
9. Chapin, Tim. 2004. Sports facilities as urban redevelopment catalysts: Baltimore's Camden Yards and Cleveland's Gateway. Journal of the American Planning Association 70:193-209.
10. City of San Diego. 2009. 2011-2015 five-year financial outlook.
11. Clarke, Susan, and Gary L. Gaile. 1998. The next wave: Local economic development strategies in the post-federal era. Economic Development Quarterly 6:189-98.
12. Coase, Ronald. 1937. The nature of the firm. Econometrica 4:386-405.
13. Conlan, Timothy J. 1988. New federalism: Intergovernmental reform and political change from Nixon to Reagan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
14. Corrigan, M., J. Hambene, W. Hudnut III, R.L. Levitt, J. Stainback, R. Ward, and N. Witenstein. 2005. Ten principles for successful public/private partnerships. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
15. Crowley, Gregory. 2006. The politics of place: Contentious urban development in Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
16. Davis, P., ed. 1986. Public-private partnerships: Improving urban life. New York: Academy of Political Science.
17. Donohue, Andrew. 2006. Terms Expired, Board Members Remain for Years. December 20. http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/government/article_13e7aa41-b09c-5f56-b37a-67850d9f958d.html.
18. Donohue, Andrew. 2008. SD unique in redevelopment. August 12. http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/this_just_in/article_0e5a957c-142b-58f0-9dd0-577dda8bf448.html.
19. Eisinger, Peter. 1998. City politics in an era of federal devolution. Urban Affairs Review 33:308-25.
20. Fainstein, Susan S. 1994. The city builders: Property, politics, and planning in London and New York. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
21. Fernandez, Sergio, Jay Eungha Ryu, and Jeffrey L. Brudney. 2008. Exploring variations in contracting for services among American local governments. American Review of Public Administration 38 (4): 439-62.
22. Fosler, S., and R. Berger. 1982. Public private partnerships in American cities. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
23. Frieden, Bernard J., and Lynne B. Sagalyn. 1989. Downtown Inc.: How America rebuilds cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Gordon, D.L.A. 1997a. Battery Park City: Politics and planning on the New York waterfront. New York: Gordon & Breach.
25. Gordon, D.L.A. 1997b. Financing urban waterfront development. Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (2): 244-65.
26. Jezierski, Louise. 1990. Neighborhoods and public-private partnerships in Pittsburgh. Urban Affairs Quarterly 26 (2): 217-40.
27. Kantor, Paul. 1988. The dependent city: The changing political economy of urban America. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
28. Karjanen, David. 2005. Priced out: An analysis of housing in downtown San Diego. San Diego, CA: Center on Policy Initiatives.
29. Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1991. The logic of delegation. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
30. Kousser, Thad. 2005. Is San Diego a low-tax city? Policy brief prepared for the 2005 mayoral debates.
31. LaVelle, Philip J. 1999. Grand jury rips golding over efforts for ballpark. San Diego Union-Tribune, June 5, B1.
32. LaVelle, Philip J. 2000. Padres avoid tough financial questions in PR campaign. San Diego Union-Tribune, January 10, B1.
33. Levin, Jonathan, and Steven Tadelis. Forthcoming. Contracting for government services: Theory and evidence from U.S. cities. Journal of Industrial Economics.
34. Levitt, Rachelle L., and John J. Kirlin, eds. 1985. Managing development through public/private negotiations. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute and the American Bar Association.
35. McCarthy, Kevin F., Steven P. Erie, and Robert E. Reichardt. 1998. Meeting the challenge of charter reform. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
36. McCubbins, Mathew D., and Thomas Schwartz. 1984. Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 165-79.
37. Miller, Gary J. 2005. The political evolution of principal-agent models. Annual Review of Political Science 8:203-25.
38. Mullin, Stephen P. 2002. Public-private partnerships and state and local economic development: Leveraging private investment. Washington, DC: U.S. Economic Development Administration.
39. National Council for Public-Private Partnerships. 2002. For the good of the people: Using public/private partnerships to meet America's essential needs. NCPP white paper, Washington, DC.
40. Noll, Roger G., and Andrew Zimbalist, eds. 1997. Sports, jobs, and taxes: The economic impact of sports teams and stadiums. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
41. Office of the City Auditor, City of San Diego. 2009. Performance audit of the Centre City Development Corporation. Audit report, July 10.
42. Office of the City Manager, City of San Diego. 2001. Offering document, continuing disclosure agreement, contract of purchase and certain other actions in connection with the city's ballpark and redevelopment project. Rep. 01-239, November 14.
43. Peterson, Paul. 1981. City limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
44. Pierre, Jon, ed. 1998. Partnerships in urban governance: European and American experience. New York: St. Martin's.
45. Pierre, Jon, ed. 2000. Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.
46. Rosenau, Pauline Vaillancourt. 1999. Introduction: The strengths and weaknesses of public-private policy partnerships. American Behavioral Scientist 43:10-34.
47. Rosenau, Pauline Vaillancourt, ed. 2000. Public-private policy partnerships. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Rosentraub, Mark S. 2010. Major league winners: Using sports and cultural centers as tools for economic development. New York: CRC Press.
49. Sagalyn, Lynne B. 1996. Meshing public and private roles in the development process. In Real estate development, edited by Mike E. Miles, Gayle Berens, and Marc A. Weiss. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
50. Sagalyn, Lynne B. 2007. Public/private development. Journal of the American Planning Association 75 (1): 7-22.
51. Saito, Leland T. 2009. From blighted to historic: Race, economic development, and historic preservation in San Diego, California. Urban Affairs Review 45:166-87.
52. San Diego County Grand Jury. 1998. Standards of disclosure re: ballpark financing project. Interim Rep. No. 2to San Diego City Council.
53. San Diego County Grand Jury. 2008. CCDC: What does it develop and with whose money? Report. San Diego, CA: County of San Diego.
54. San Diego County Grand Jury. 2009. Redevelopment in the City of San Diego-A call for transparency report. San Diego, CA: County of San Diego.
55. Steele, Jeanette. 2009. Ballpark, as catalyst, is batting. 500. San Diego Union-Tribune, April 6, A1.
56. Stephenson, Max O., Jr. 1991. Whither the public-private partnership: A critical overview. Urban Affairs Quarterly 27 (1): 109-27.
57. Stoker, Robert P. 1987. Baltimore: The self-evaluating city? In The politics of urban development, edited by Clarence N. Stone and Heywood T. Sanders. Lawrence: Univ. Press of Kansas.
58. Stolz, Martin. 2005a. Critics take swing at JMI's pitch for Ballpark Village. San Diego Union-Tribune, May 31, B1.
59. Stolz, Martin. 2005b. Panel calls Ballpark Village deal presentation misleading. San Diego Union-Tribune, October 2, B7.
60. Stone, Clarence. 1989. Regime politics. Lawrence: Univ. Press of Kansas.
61. Task Force on Ballpark Planning. 1998. Report of the City of San Diego Task Force on Ballpark Planning. San Diego, CA: Task Force on Ballpark Planning.
62. Vining, Aidan R., Anthony E. Boardman, and Finn Poschmann. 2005. Public-private partnerships in the US and Canada: There are no free lunches. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 7 (3): 199-220.
63. Walzer, Norman, and Lori York. 1998. Public-private partnerships in U.S. cities. In Public-private partnerships for local economic development, edited by Norman Walzer and Brian D. Jacobs. Westport, CT: Praeger.
64. Weisberg, Lori. 1999. Padres unveil details about development. San Diego Union-Tribune, March 13, A1.
65. Williamson, Oliver E. 1988. The logic of economic organization. Journal of Law Economics, and Organization 4 (1): 65-93.