Evaluation exemplar: Exemplary aspects of a small group-randomized local educational program evaluation

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 254-265

  Smith, Nick L ^a   Brandon, Paul R ^b   Lawton, Brian E ^b   Krohn Ching, Val ^b  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952894867     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: 15570878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1098214010366051     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bloom, H.S., Bos, J.M., & Lee, S.W. (1999). Using cluster random assignment to measure program impacts: Statistical implications for the evaluation of education programs. Evaluation Review, 23, 455-469.
2. Brandon, P.R., Lawton, B.E., & Krohn-Ching, V. (2007). Evaluation of the final year of the ARTS FIRST Windward Research Project. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Curriculum Research & Development Group. Retrieved January 10, 2009, fromhttp://www.hawaii.edu/crdg/sections/pre/art_education.html.
3. Luellen, J.K., Shadish, W.R., & Clark, M.H. (2005). Propensity scores: An introduction and experimental test. Evaluation Review, 29, 530-558.
4. McCoach, D.B., & Siegle, D. (2003). The school attitude assessment survey-revised: A new instrument to identify academically able students who underachieve. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 414-429.
5. Murray, D.M. (1998). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6. Oreck, B. (2001). Teaching with the arts survey. Unpublished survey instrument. University of Connecticut at Storrs.
7. Rowan, B., & Correnti, R. (2009). Studying reading instruction with teacher logs: Lessons from the Study of Instructional Improvement. Educational Researcher, 38, 120-131.
8. The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.