Preparation, characterization and application of a Ce-Ti oxide adsorbent for enhanced removal of arsenate from water

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 179, Issue 1-3, 2010, Pages 1014-1021

  Deng, Shubo ^a   Li, Zhijian ^a   Huang, Jun ^a   Yu, Gang ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

As(V); Ce Ti adsorbent; Hydrolysis; Sorption capacity; Sorption kinetics

Indexed keywords

AS(V); BATCH SORPTION; BED VOLUME; CERIUM OXIDES; COLUMN STUDY; CONCENTRATION OF; EFFECT OF PH; ENVIRONMENTAL SCANNING; HYBRID ADSORBENTS; METAL-DOPED; MOLAR RATIO; PRECIPITATION METHODS; PREPARATION CONDITIONS; SIZE RANGES; SORPTION CAPACITIES; SORPTION CAPACITY; SORPTION KINETICS; SPECTROSCOPIC INVESTIGATIONS; TI OXIDES;

ADSORBENTS; ADSORPTION; CERIUM COMPOUNDS; EFFLUENTS; HYDROLYSIS; NANOPARTICLES; PH EFFECTS; POLYMER BLENDS; PRECIPITATION (CHEMICAL); TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TITANIUM OXIDES; VANADIUM; X RAY DIFFRACTION; X RAY DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS;

CERIUM;

ARSENIC ACID; CERIUM OXIDE; NANOPARTICLE; POLYVINYL ALCOHOL; TITANIUM;

ADSORPTION; AMORPHOUS MEDIUM; ARSENATE; CERIUM; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); HYDROLYSIS; OXIDE; PARTICLE SIZE; PRECIPITATION (CHEMISTRY); REACTION KINETICS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TITANIUM; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYDROLYSIS; ISOTHERM; PARTICLE SIZE; PH; PRECIPITATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ADSORPTION; ARSENATES; CERIUM; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; METALS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POLYVINYL ALCOHOL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMICS; TITANIUM; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 77952890017     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.106     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Berg M., Luzi S., Trang P.T.K., Viet P.H., Giger W., Stuben D. Arsenic removal from groundwater by household sand filters: comparative field study, model calculations, and health benefits. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:5567-5573.
2. Deng S.B., Ting Y.P. Removal of As(V) and As(III) from water with a PEI-modified fungal biomass. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 55:177-185.
3. Dixit S., Hering J.G. Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:4182-4189.
4. Loukidou M.X., Matis K.A., Zouboulis A.I., Liakopoulou-Kyriakidou M. Removal of As(V) from wastewaters by chemically modified fungal biomass. Water Res. 2003, 37:4544-4552.
5. Lin T.F., Wu J.K. Adsorption of arsenite and As(V) within activated alumina grains: equilibrium and kinetics. Water Res. 2001, 35:2049-2057.
6. Zhang J.S., Stanforth R. Slow adsorption reaction between arsenic species and goethite (alpha-FeOOH): diffusion or heterogeneous surface reaction control. Langmuir 2005, 21:2895-2901.
7. Singh T.S., Pant K.K. Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamic studies for adsorption of As(III) on activated alumina. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 36:139-147.
8. Gu Z.M., Fang J., Deng B.L. Preparation and evaluation of GAC-based iron-containing adsorbents for arsenic removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:3833-3843.
9. Sherman D.M., Randall S.R. Surface complexation of arsenie(V) to iron(III) (hydr)oxides: structural mechanism from ab initio molecular geometries and EXAFS spectroscopy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2003, 67:4223-4230.
10. Munoz J.A., Gonzalo A., Valiente M. Arsenic adsorption by Fe(III)-loaded open-celled cellulose sponge: thermodynamic and selectivity aspects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:3405-3411.
11. Driehaus W., Jekel M., Hildebrandt U. Granular ferric hydroxide - a new adsorbent for the removal of arsenic from natural water. J. Water Service Res. Technol. - AQUA 1998, 47:30-35.
12. Bang S., Patel M., Lippicott L., Meng X.G. Removal of arsenic from groundwater by granular titanium dioxide adsorbent. Chemosphere 2005, 60:389-397.
13. Pena M.E., Korfiatis G.P., Patel M., Lippincott L., Meng X.G. Adsorption of As(V) and As(III) by nanocrystalline titanium dioxide. Water Res. 2005, 39:2327-2337.
14. Pena M., Meng X.G., Korfiatis G.P., Jing C.Y. Adsorption mechanism of arsenic on nanocrystalline titanium dioxide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:1257-1262.
15. 2 suspension: kinetics and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:3872-3878.
16. Neppolian B., Celik E., Choi H. Photochemical oxidation of arsenic(III) to arsenic(V) using peroxydisulfate ions as an oxidizing agent. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:6179-6184.
17. Zhang G.S., Qu J.H., Liu H.J., Liu R.P., Wu R.C. Preparation and evaluation of a novel Fe-Mn binary oxide adsorbent for effective arsenite removal. Water Res. 2007, 41:1921-1928.
18. Zhang Y., Yang M., Dou X.M., He H., Wang D.S. As(V) adsorption on an Fe-Ce bimetal oxide adsorbent: role of surface properties. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:7246-7253.
19. Goh K.H., Lim T.T., Dong Z.L. Enhanced arsenic removal by hydrothermally treated nanocrystalline Mg/Al layered double hydroxide with nitrate intercalation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:2537-2543.
20. Biswas B.K., Inoue K., Ghimire K.N., Kawakita H., Ohto K., Harada H. Effective removal of arsenic with lanthanum(III) and cerium(III)-loaded orange waste gels. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2008, 43:2144-2165.
21. 2 spheres. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:3786-3790.
22. 2 nanoparticles by non-hydrothermal method. Cryst. Res. Technol. 2009, 44:484-488.
23. 2 catalysts. Fuel 2008, 87:2229-2235.
24. Wu X.M., Zhang Y., Dou X.M., Yang M. Fluoride removal performance of a novel Fe-Al-Ce trimetal oxide adsorbent. Chemosphere 2007, 69:1758-1764.
25. Deng S.B., Yu G., Xie S.H., Yu Q., Huang J., Kuwaki Y., Iseki M. Enhanced adsorption of As(V) on the aminated fibers: sorption behavior and uptake mechanism. Langmuir 2008, 24:10961-10967.
26. Gupta K., Ghosh U.C. Arsenic removal using hydrous nanostructure iron(III)-titanium(IV) binary mixed oxide from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161:884-892.
27. Ho Y.S., McKay G. The kinetics of sorption of divalent metal ions onto sphagnum moss peat. Water Res. 2000, 34:735-742.
28. Banerjee K., Amy G.L., Prevost M., Nour S., Jekel M., Gallagher P.M., Blumenschein C.D. Kinetic and thermodynamic aspects of adsorption of arsenic onto granular ferric hydroxide (GFH). Water Res. 2008, 42:3371-3378.
29. Zhang Y., Yang M., Huang X. Arsenic(V) removal with a Ce(IV)-doped iron oxide adsorbent. Chemosphere 2003, 51:945-952.
30. Lakshmipathiraj P., Narasimhan B.R.V., Prabhakar S., Bhaskar Raju G. Adsorption of arsenate on synthetic goethite from aqueous solutions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 136:281-287.
31. Balaji T., Yokoyama T., Matsunaga H. Adsorption and removal of As(V) and As(III) using Zr-loaded lysine diacetic acid chelating resin. Chemosphere 2005, 59:1169-1174.
32. Altundogan H.S., Altundogan S., Tumen F., Bildik M. Arsenic removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on red mud. Waste Manage. 2000, 20:761-767.
33. Cumbal L., Sengupta A.K. Arsenic removal using polymer-supported hydrated iron(III) oxide nanoparticles: role of Donnan membrane effect. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:6508-6515.
34. Guo X.J., Chen F.H. Removal of arsenic by bead cellulose loaded with iron oxyhydroxide from groundwater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:6808-6818.
35. D. Mohan, C. U. P. Jr, Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents - a critical review, J. Hazard. Mater. 142 (2007) 1-53.