The value of information in spatial decision making

Mathematical Geosciences

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 141-163

  Bhattacharjya, Debarun ^a   Eidsvik, Jo ^b   Mukerji, Tapan ^c  

^a IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision analysis; Markov random field; Recursive computation; Spatial decision making; Value of experiment; Value of information

Indexed keywords

DECISION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION; MARKOV CHAIN; NUMERICAL MODEL; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 77952887681     PISSN: 18748961     EISSN: 18748953     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-009-9256-y     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ash RB (1965) Information theory. Dover, New York.
2. Avseth P, Mukerji T, Mavko G (2005) Quantitative seismic interpretation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Besag J (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. J R Stat Soc Ser B 36: 192-225.
4. Bickel JE, Gibson RL, McVay DA, Pickering S, Waggoner J (2006) Quantifying 3D land seismic reliability and value. Soc Pet Eng J SPE 102340.
5. Begg S, Bratvold RB, Campbell JM (2002) The value of flexibility in managing uncertainty in oil and gas investments. SPE 77586.
6. Carroll C, Zielinski WJ, Noss RF (1999) Using presence-absence data to build and test spatial habitat models for the fisher in the Klamath region, USA. Conserv Biol 13: 1344-1359.
7. Clyde MA (2001) Experimental design: A Bayesian perspective. In: Smelser et al (eds) International encyclopedia in social and behavioral sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
8. Cunningham P, Begg S (2008) Using the value of information to determine optimal well order in a sequential drilling program. AAPG Bull 92: 1393-1402.
9. Diggle P, Lophaven S (2006) Bayesian geostatistical design. Scand J Stat 33: 53-64.
10. Eidsvik J, Avseth P, Omre H, Mukerji T, Mavko G (2004) Stochastic reservoir characterization using prestack seismic data. Geophysics 69: 978-993.
11. Eidsvik J, Bhattacharjya D, Mukerji T (2008) Value of information of seismic amplitude and CSEM resistivity. Geophysics 73: R59-R69.
12. Friel N, Rue H (2007) Recursive computing and simulation-free inference for general factorizable models. Biometrika 94: 661-672.
13. Fuentes M, Chaudhuri A, Holland DM (2007) Bayesian entropy for spatial sampling design of environmental data. Environ Ecol Stat 14: 323-340.
14. Houck RT, Pavlov DA (2006) Evaluating reconnaissance CSEM survey designs using detection theory. Lead Edge 25: 994-1004.
15. Howard R (1966) Information value theory. IEEE Trans Syst Sci Cybern 2(1): 22-26.
16. Howard R (1970) Decision analysis: Perspectives on inference, decision and experimentation. Proc IEEE 58: 632-643, IEEE Special Issue, Detection Theory and Applications.
17. Le ND, Zidek JV (2006) Statistical analysis of environmental space-time processes. Springer, Berlin.
18. Lindley DV (1971) Making decisions. Wiley, New York.
19. Liu JS (2001) Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing. Springer, New York.
20. Marchant BP, Lark RM (2007) Optimized sample schemes for geostatistical surveys. Math Geol 39: 113-134.
21. Matheson JE (1990) Using influence diagrams to value information and control. In: Oliver RM, Smith JQ (eds) Influence diagrams, belief nets and decision analysis. Wiley, New York, pp 25-48.
22. Mukerji T, Avseth P, Mavko G, Takahashi I, Gonzalez E (2001) Statistical rock physics; combining rock physics, information theory, and geostatistics to reduce uncertainty in seismic reservoir characterization. Lead Edge 20: 313-319.
23. Müller WG (2001) Collecting spatial data. Springer, Heidelberg.
24. Polasky A, Solow AR (2001) The value of information in reserve site selection. Biodivers Conserv 10: 1051-1058.
25. Raiffa H (1968) Decision analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
26. Reeves R, Pettitt AN (2004) Efficient recursions for general factorisable models. Biometrika 91: 751-757.
27. Welton NJ, Ades AE, Caldwell DM, Peters TJ (2008) Research prioritization based on expected value of partial perfect information: a case-study on interventions to increase uptake of breast cancer screening. J R Stat Soc A 171: 807-841.
28. Yokota F, Thompson KM (2004) Value of information analysis in environmental health risk management decisions: past, present and future. Risk Anal 24: 635-650.
29. Zidek JV, Sun W, Le ND (2000) Designing and integrating composite networks for monitoring multivariate Gaussian pollution fields. Appl Stat 49: 63-79.