Using conditioning on observed choices to retrieve individual-specific attribute processing strategies

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 781-790

  Hess, Stephane ^a   Hensher, David A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attribute processing; Ignoring attributes; Stated choice; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

RESEARCH; TRANSPORTATION;

COEFFICIENT DISTRIBUTION; EXPLANATORY VARIABLES; IGNORING ATTRIBUTES; PROCESSING STRATEGIES; STATED CHOICE; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

SURVEYS;

CONDITIONING; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MODELING; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 77952886873     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Campbell D., Hutchinson W.G., Scarpa R. Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics 2008, 41(3):401-417.
2. Cantillo V., Heydecker B., Ortuzar J., de Dios A discrete choice model incorporating thresholds for perception in attribute values. Transportation Research Part B 2006, 40(9):807-825.
3. Caussade S., Ortúzar, Juan de Dios Ortúzar J., Rizzi L., Hensher D.A. Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates. Transportation Research Part B 2005, 39(7):621-640.
4. Heuristics and Biases - The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (Eds.).
5. Hensher D.A. Attribute processing in choice experiments. Valuing Environmental Amenities using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice 2006, 135-158. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. K. Barbara (Ed.).
6. Hensher D.A. How do respondents process stated choice experiments? - attribute consideration under varying information load. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2006, 21(6):861-878.
7. Hensher D.A. Joint estimation of process and outcome in choice experiments and implications for willingness to pay. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2008, 42(2):297-322.
8. Hensher D.A., Greene W. The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation 2003, 30(2):133-176.
9. Hensher, D.A., Greene, W.H., 2008. Non-attendance and Dual Processing of Common-Metric Attributes in Choice Analysis: A Latent Class Specification, Department of Economics, New York University, August.
10. Hensher D.A., Layton D. Attribute Thresholding in the Presence on Attribute Non-attendance 2008, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, University of Sydney.
11. Hensher D.A., Rose J., Bertoia T. The implications on willingness to pay of a stochastic treatment of attribute processing in stated choice studies. Transportation Research Part E 2007, 43(1):73-89.
12. Hess S., Bierlaire M., Polak J.W. Estimation of value of travel-time savings using mixed logit models. Transportation Research Part A 2005, 39(2-3):221-236.
13. Hess S., Rose J.M., Hensher D.A. Asymmetrical preference formation in willingness to pay estimates in discrete choice models. Transportation Research Part E 2008, 44(5):847-863.
14. Hess, S., Rose, J.M., 2007. A Latent Class Approach to Modelling Heterogeneous Information Processing Strategies in SP Studies, Paper Presented at the Oslo Workshop on Valuation Methods in Transport Planning, Oslo.
15. Houston D.A., Sherman S.J., Baker S.M. The Influence of unique features and direction of comparison on preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1989, 25(2):121-141.
16. Kahnemann D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47(2):263-291.
17. Layton, D., Hensher, D.A., forthcoming. Aggregation of Common-Metric Attributes in Preference Revelation in Choice Experiments and Implications for Willingness to Pay, Transportation Research Part D.
18. Puckett S.M., Hensher D.A. The role of attribute processing strategies in estimating the preferences of road freight stakeholders under variable road user charges. Transportation Research Part E 2008, 44(3):379-395.
19. Rose J.M., Bliemer M.C., Hensher, Collins A.T. Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42(4):395-406.
20. Scarpa R., Gilbride T., Campbell D., Hensher D.A. Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2009, 36(2):151-174.
21. Swait J. A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cut-offs. Transportation Research Part B 2001, 35(10):903-928.
22. Thaler R. Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1999, 12(3):183-206.
23. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.