Issues in the relationship between theory and practice in management accounting

Management Accounting Research

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 79-82

  Baldvinsdottir, Gudrun ^a   Mitchell, Falconer ^b   Nørreklit, Hanne ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Practice; Social science; Technical core

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952885362     PISSN: 10445005     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2010.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anthony R.N. Accounting for the Cost of Interest 1975, Lexington, Mass., USA.
2. Baxter W., Oxenfeldt A.R. Costing and Pricing: The Cost Accountant versus the Economist, Business Horizons, 4 1961, 4. 77-90, (reprinted in Studies in Cost Analysis, In: D. Solomons (Ed.), Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1968).
3. Chapman C.S., Hopwood A.G., Shields M.D. Handbook of Management Accounting Research 2007, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
4. De Haas M., Kleingeld A. Multilevel design of performance measurement systems: enhancing strategic dialogue throughout the organization. Management Accounting Research 1999, 10:233-261.
5. Drury C., Tayles M. Product costing in UK manufacturing organisations. The European Accounting Review 1994, 3(3):443-469.
6. Drury C., Tayles M. Explicating the design of overhead absorption procedures in UK organisations. British Accounting Review 2005, 37:47-84.
7. Innes J., Mitchell F., Sinclair D. Activity-based costing in the UK's largest companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey results. Management Accounting Research 2000, 11:349-362.
8. Kasanen E., Lukka K., Siitonen A. The constructive approach in management accounting research. Journal of Management Accounting Research 1993, 5:243-264.
9. Luft J.L., Shields M.D. Zimmerman's contentious conjectures: describing the present and prescribing the future of empirical management accounting research. European Accounting Review 2002, 11.(4).
10. Malmi T., Granlund M. In search of management accounting theory. The European Accounting Review 2009, 18(3):597-620.
11. Norreklit H. The balance on the balanced scorecard-a critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Management Accounting Research 2000, 11:65-88.
12. Panozzo F. The making of the good academic accountant. Accounting Organisations and Society 1997, 22(5):447-480.
13. Patell J.M. Cost accounting, process control and product design: a case study of the Hewlett-Packard personal office computer division. The Accounting Review 1987, 62(4):808-839.
14. Pfeffer J., Sutton R.I. Knowing what to do is not enough: turning knowledge into action. California Management Review 1999, (Fall):83-108.
15. Ryan R., Scapens R.W., Theobald M. Research Method & Methodology in Finance & Accounting 2002, Thomson, London, UK.
16. Solomons D. Divisional Performance: Measurement and Control 1965, Richard D Irwin, Illinois, USA.
17. Thomas A.L. The Allocation Problem: Part Two 1974, American Accounting Association.
18. Tuomela T. The interplay of different levers of control: a case study of introducing a new performance system. Management Accounting Research 2005, 16(3):293-320.
19. Watts R., Zimmerman J. The demand for and supply of accounting theories. The market for excuses. The Accounting Review 1979, 59:273-305.
20. Watts R., Zimmerman J. Positive Accounting Theory 1986, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
21. Zimmerman J. The costs and benefits of cost allocations. The Accounting Review 1979, 54:504-521.
22. Zimmerman J. Conjectures regarding empirical management accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2001, 32(1-3):411-427.